Validation of an instrument to determine students' perception of the educational environment and its impact on mental symptomatology and academic performance.
Abstract
Background: There are information gaps about the perception that students have of the factors of the educational environment that favor the manifestation of mental symptoms and how it impacts on academic performance. Objective: Determine the content validity of an interview script through expert judgment. Method: An interview type instrument was designed with nine open questions that refer to the educational environment, mental symptoms, and academic performance, aimed at students in the health area. The evaluation of the questions was carried out based on the univocity and relevance scales using the Carrera, Vaquero and Basells method. Results: six questions obtained univocity and relevance indices ≥0.8, so they met the criteria of being generally understood and interpreted in only one way, in addition to being mostly adequate and/or relevant for the population to be studied. Instead, the questions: How would you describe your college and how do you feel in it? And what changes do you think are necessary in the educational environment to reduce mental symptoms? they obtained indices <0.8, so they were modified in their wording. Subsequently, they were sent in a second round of evaluation to the experts, in which they obtained indices ≥0.8. Conclusion: there is a valid interview script in its content to know the perception of the students of the health area about the educational environment and its implications in mental health.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Rusticus SA, Wilson D, Casiro O, Lovato C. Evaluating the Quality of Health Professions Learning Environments: Development and Validation of the Health Education Learning Environment Survey (HELES). Eval Health Prof. 2020 sep 4;43(3):162–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278719834339
Galaviz Loya KR, Amador Negrete BJ, Parra Acosta H. Incidencia del medio ambiente académico en la formación biomédica. Revista Española de Educación Médica. 2021 feb 1;2(1):22–33. https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.455431
Laverde Robayo DM, Fonseca MO, Vergel Guerrero JA, Ospina Maldonado VM, Quintero Hernández GA. Validez y confiabilidad del DREEM en español colombiano y su adaptación a un currículo integrador. Investigación en Educación Médica. 2020 abr 1;(34):63–75. https://doi.org/10.22201/facmed.20075057e.2020.34.19197
Alarcón RD. La Salud Mental de los estudiantes universitarios. Revista Medica Herediana. 2020 ene 13;30(4):219–21. https://doi.org/10.20453/rmh.v30i4.3655
Restrepo JE, Sánchez OA, Castañeda Quirama T. Estrés académico en estudiantes universitarios. Psicoespacios. 2020 may 26;14(24):17–37. https://doi.org/10.25057/21452776.1331
Aghajani G, Mahdi S, Sami N, Khakpour S, Ghorbani Yekta B. The prevalence of educational burnout, depression, anxiety, and stress among medical students of the Islamic Azad University in Tehran, Iran. BMC Med Educ. 2021 dic 5;21(1):471. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02874-7
Showraki M, Showraki T, Brown K. Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Revisited. Psychiatric Quarterly. 2020 sep 7;91(3):905–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09747-0
Corea M. La depresión y su impacto en la salud pública. Rev Med Hondur. 2021 may 3;89(Supl.1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.5377/rmh.v89iSupl.1.12047
Dopheide J. Insomnia overview: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and monitoring, and nonpharmacologic therapy. Am J Manag Care. 2020 mar 1;26(Suppl 4):S76–84. https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2020.42769
Capdevila-Gaudens P, García-Abajo JM, Flores-Funes D, García-Barbero M, García-Estañ J. Depression, anxiety, burnout and empathy among Spanish medical students. PLoS One. 2021 dic 2;16(12):e0260359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260359
Gutiérrez Pastor I, Quesada Rico JA, Gutiérrez Pastor A, Nouni García R, Carratalá Munuera MC. Depresión, ansiedad y salud autopercibida en estudiantes de Medicina: un estudio transversal. Revista Española de Educación Médica. 2021 may 17;2(2):21–31. http://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.470371
Nogueira Pires R, Mentz da Silva W, Piola da Silva RG, Ribeiro Rossi E, Moraes Marques C, Meister Coelho IC, et al. Evaluación de intervenciones que promueven la calidad de vida de los estudiantes de medicina: una revisión sistemática. Revista Española de Educación Médica. 2022 jun 28;3(2). http://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.514541
Urrutia M, Barrios S, Gutiérrez M, Mayorga M. Métodos óptimos para determinar validez de contenido. Educación Médica Superior [Internet]. 2014 [citado 2023 ene 17];28(3). Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=s0864-21412014000300014
Cabello S, Carrera F. Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para conocer las actitudes y creencias del profesorado de educación infantil y primaria sobre la introducción de la robótica educativa en el aula. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa [Internet]. 2017 jun [citado 2022 oct 20];60. Available from: https://repositori.udl.cat/bitstream/handle/10459.1/65129/026245.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Hernández R, Fernández C, Baptista M del pilar. Metodología de la investigación. Sexta. México D.F.: McGRAW-HILL; 2014. 2–20 p.
Escobar-Pérez J, Cuervo-Martínez A. Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición [Internet]. 2008 [citado 2023 ene 21];6:27–36. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302438451_Validez_de_contenido_y_juicio_de_expertos_Una_aproximacion_a_su_utilizacion
De la Cruz Villegas V, Gordillo Fuentes EJ. Validación de entrevistas por juicio de expertos en el estudio de la inclusión educativa en el área de lenguas extranjeras. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo. 2020 ago 6;11(21). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i21.710
Obregón Sierra Á, González Fernández N. La Wikipedia en las facultades de educación españolas. Diseño y validación de herramientas diagnósticas cuantitativas y cualitativas. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación [Internet]. 2018 [citado 2022 oct 24];77(2):55–76. Available from: https://rieoei.org/RIE/article/view/3174/3975
Robles Rodríguez A, Robles Rodríguez J, Giménez Fuentes-Guerra FJ, Abad Robles MT. Validación de una entrevista para estudiar el proceso formativo de judokas de élite / Validation of an Interview for Study the Process of Formation of Elite Judokas. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte. 2016;64(2016). https://doi.org/10.15366/rimcafd2016.64.007
García-Martín A, Antúnez A, Ibáñez SJ. Análisis del proceso formativo en jugadores expertos: validación de instrumento / Analysis of expert players’ training process: validation of tools. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte. 2016;61(2016). https://doi.org/10.15366/rimcafd2016.61.012
Carrera F, Vaquero E, Balsells MA. Instrumento de evaluación de competencias digitales para adolescentes en riesgo social. EDUTEC, Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa [Internet]. 2011 [citado 2022 oct 20];35. Available from: https://www.edutec.es/revista/index.php/edutec-e/article/view/410
Mediavilla L, García J. Diseño, creación y validación de una entrevista para obtener datos biográficos, de carácter deportivo-militar, de los militares que participaron en unos juegos olímpicos. Journal of Sport and Health Research [Internet]. 2013 [citado 2022 oct 26];5(2):157–66. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/148669227.pdf
Palacio C, García J, Arbeláez M, Sánchez R, Aguirre B, Garcés I, et al. Validación de la entrevista diagnóstica para estudios genéticos (DIGS) en Colombia. Biomedica [Internet]. 2004 [citado 2022 nov 1];24(1):56–62. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/bio/v24n1/v24n1a08.pdf
Copyright (c) 2022 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the economic rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows them to be reused under the use license indicated in point 2.
2. The works are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically the pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) of their works before publication , since it favors its circulation and earlier diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
