Evaluation of human anatomy in emergency remote teaching
Abstract
The objective of the study was twofold: to evaluate student satisfaction with the online assessment, and the differences in this assessment according to whether it was carried out at home or in the classroom. The design and methodology were based on satisfaction surveys of the type of evaluation and a statistical analysis to assess the differences in the results according to the place where the evaluation was carried out. The students' evaluation does not show unanimity (53%) in considering online evaluation as a good evaluation method, although 67% and 90% (depending on the course and subject) would use digital tools to evaluate face-to-face. The reduction of time and connection are the main disadvantages valued. The results of the global evaluation do not show changes depending on whether it is face-to-face or distance. Therefore, we consider that the use of new technologies for evaluation has been well accepted by students and teachers, and no different results are observed for face-to-face or distance learning.
Downloads
Metrics
References
(1) Mora Vargas, A. I. La Evaluación Educativa: Concepto, Períodos y Modelos. Actual. Investig. En Educ. 2011, 4. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v4i2.9084.
(2) Beltrán, M. R.; Schmelkes, S.; Díaz-Barriga, Á. La Evaluación Educativa1. Perfiles Educ. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0185-2698(14)70645-2.
(3) Aparicio Gómez, W.; Aparicio Gómez, O. Y. Evaluación En Entornos Digitales; 2020. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26399.18080/1.
(4) Dorrego, E. Educación a distancia y evaluación del aprendizaje. Rev. Educ. Distancia RED 2016, No. 50. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/50/12.
(5) García-Peñalvo, F. J. Evaluación Del Aprendizaje En Entornos Virtuales y Remotos. 2020.
(6) Grande de Prado, M.; García Peñalvo, F. J.; Corell, A.; Abella García, V. La Virtualización Causada Por El Covid-19: Recomendaciones Para La Evaluación. Ensinar Avaliar E Aprender No Ensino Super. Perspetivas Int. 2020, 231–250.
(7) Grande de Prado, M.; García Peñalvo, F. J.; Corell, A.; Abella-García, V. Evaluación En Educación Superior Durante La Pandemia de La COVID-19. Campus Virtuales 2021, 1 (10), 49–58.
(8) Paz-Albo, J.; Escobar, A. Socrative Como Herramienta de Innovación En La Educación Superior; 2018; pp 18–22.
(9) Frías, M.; Arce, C.; Flores-Morales, P. Uso de La Plataforma Socrative.Com Para Alumnos de Química General. Educ. Quím. 2015, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eq.2015.09.003.
(10) Sadeesh, T.; Prabavathy, G.; Ganapathy, A. Evaluation of Undergraduate Medical Students’ Preference to Human Anatomy Practical Assessment Methodology: A Comparison between Online and Traditional Methods. Surg. Radiol. Anat. SRA 2021, 43 (4), 531–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02637-x.
(11) Suárez-Escudero, J. C.; Muñoz, L. J. B.; Jurado, M. C. P.; Carmona, E. P. A.; Sánchez, A. J. U.; Burgos, S. R.; Gutiérrez, C. A. B.; Morales, J. L. F. Percepción de los estudiantes sobre adaptaciones virtuales en cursos de anatomía humana por la contingencia SARS-CoV-2. Acad. Virtualidad 2021, 14 (1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.18359/ravi.5275.
(12) Yu-Fong Chang, J.; Wang, L.-H.; Lin, T.-C.; Cheng, F.-C.; Chiang, C.-P. Comparison of Learning Effectiveness between Physical Classroom and Online Learning for Dental Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Dent. Sci. 2021, 16 (4), 1281–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.07.016.
(13) Hakami, Z. Comparison between Virtual and Traditional Learning Methods for Orthodontic Knowledge and Skills in Dental Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Healthc. Basel Switz. 2021, 9 (9), 1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091092.
(14) Rodríguez Gómez, H. M.; Salinas Salazar, M. L. La Evaluación Para El Aprendizaje En La Educación Superior: Retos de La Alfabetización Del Profesorado. Rev. Iberoam. Eval. Educ. 2020, 13 (1), 111. https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2020.13.1.005.
(15) Brown, S. A.; Glasner, A. Evaluar En La Universidad : Problemas y Nuevos Enfoques. Evaluar En Univ. Probl. Nuevos Enfoques 2003 ISBN 84-277-1422-X Págs 61-74 2003.
(16) Beltran, L. M. G.; Mamani, E. U. SOCRATIVE COMO UNA HERRAMIENTA DE EVALUACIÓN PERMANENTE EN EL PROCESO DE LOS APRENDIZAJES. 37.
Copyright (c) 2021 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the economic rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows them to be reused under the use license indicated in point 2.
2. The works are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically the pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) of their works before publication , since it favors its circulation and earlier diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
