Adaptação transcultural e validação do instrumento Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure Instrument

Rafaela Ferreira; Nathalia Sucheck; Juliana Sá; Isabel Neto

doi:10.6018/edumed.603501

Autores/as

Rafaela Ferreira FCS-UBI https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8542-926X
Nathalia Sucheck Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
Juliana Sá Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
Isabel Neto Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.603501

Palabras clave: Educação Médica, Ambiente de Aprendizagem, Estudos de Validação, Ensino Médico Pré-Graduado, Medical Education, Learning Environment, Validation Studies, Pre-Graduate Medical Education

Agencias de apoyo

No funding was received

Resumen

Introdução: A avaliação do ambiente de aprendizagem é indispensável para a constante melhoria da qualidade de ensino e, por consequência, o alcance pelos estudantes dos objetivos de aprendizagem. Tendo em conta a ausência de instrumentos em português de Portugal para avaliar o ambiente de aprendizagem em meio clínico, este trabalho teve como objetivo validar o instrumento Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure para português de Portugal, através da adaptação transcultural deste instrumento. Materiais e métodos: A população alvo do projeto foram os alunos de Medicina da Universidade da Beira Interior que frequentaram estágios clínicos curriculares no ano letivo 2022/2023. Procedeu-se à realização de um focus group para formular uma primeira versão adaptada para português de Portugal, versão esta que foi revista por especialistas da área. De seguida, aplicou-se esta versão num pré-teste, seguido de entrevistas individuais. Os resultados obtidos foram discutidos, o instrumento revisto e foi feita a análise da distribuição de respostas. Por fim, aplicou-se a versão final do instrumento adaptado na população alvo, tendo sido feito posteriormente o tratamento estatístico e avaliação das propriedades psicométricas do instrumento. Resultados: A primeira versão adaptada foi aplicada num pré-teste a 34 participantes, tendo gerado uma versão final para ser aplicada na população alvo. Foram obtidas 270 respostas válidas, tendo a análise fatorial confirmatória demonstrado que o instrumento adaptado para o contexto português é válido e fiável, com coeficiente de Ômega de 0,96. Conclusão: Será necessária uma reflexão posterior sobre a questão “Tenho acesso adequado aos computadores” dado o panorama nacional sobre o acesso dos estudantes de medicina aos registos clínicos. No entanto, o instrumento adaptado para o contexto português revelou-se válido e fiável, estando pronto a ser utilizado para avaliar o ambiente de aprendizagem em meio clínico, dos estudantes de medicina.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Strand P, Sjöborg K, Stalmeijer R, Wichmann-Hansen G, Jakobsson U, Edgren G. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM). Med Teach. 2013; 35(12):1014–26. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2013.835389

Hutchinson L. ABC of learning and teaching: Educational environment. https://doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmj.326.7393.810

Costa M da, Boller C, Zagonel IPS. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation to the Portuguese language and validation of the Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure Instrument (Uceem). Rev Bras Educ Med. 2022;46(1). https://www.scielo.br/j/rbem/a/6d4HYrpLTvxFmwkVWkjnfbx/

Troncon LE de A. Ambiente educacional. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto). 2014;47(3):264-71. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7262.v47i3p264-271

Nordquist J, Hall J, Caverzagie K, Snell L, Chan MK, Thoma B, et al. The clinical learning environment. Med Teach. 2019;41(4):366–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2019.1566601

Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 1): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education–a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2001 3;23(4):337–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590120075661

Skochelak SE, Stansfield RB, Dunham L, Dekhtyar M, Gruppen LD, Christianson C, et al. Medical student perceptions of the learning environment at the end of the first year: A 28-medical school collaborative. Academic Medicine. 2016; 91(9):1257–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001137

Rusticus S, Worthington A, Wilson D, Joughin K. The Medical School Learning Environment Survey: an examination of its factor structure and relationship to student performance and satisfaction. Learn Environ Res. 2014; 17(3):423–35. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10984-014-9167-9

Domingues Hirsch C et al. Fatores preditores e associados à satisfação dos estudantes de enfermagem Predictive and associated factors with nursing students’ satisfaction. Acta Paul Enferm. 2015; 28(6):566–72. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201500093

Schönrock-Adema J, Bouwkamp-Timmer T, van Hell EA, Cohen-Schotanus J. Key elements in assessing the educational environment: Where is the theory? Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2012; 17(5):727–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9346-8

Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, Scherpbier A. Experience-based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students’ workplace learning. Med Educ. 2007; 41(1):84–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02652.x

Weiss KB, Bagian JP, Nasca TJ. The Clinical Learning Environment. The Foundation of Graduate Medical Education. Vol. 309, JAMA. 2013. http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.1931

Kilty C, Wiese A, Bergin C, Flood P, Fu N, Horgan M, et al. A national stakeholder consensus study of challenges and priorities for clinical learning environments in postgraduate medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2017; 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1065-2

Spencer J. Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. BMJ 2003; 326:591. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7389.591

Wu D, Guo M, Xu C. The Development of Continuing Medical Education in China. Creat Educ. 2021; 12(01):203–11. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.121015

Messas JT, Leonello VM, Fernandes MDFP, Gonçalves GCDC, Bucchi SM, Mira VL. The educational environment of the undergraduate nursing course from the student perspective. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem. 2015; 49(SpecialIssue 2):104–12. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0080-623420150000800015

Ahmady S, Khani H. The situational analysis of teaching-learning in clinical education in Iran: a postmodern grounded theory study. BMC Med Educ . 2022; 22(1):520. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03577-3

Sellberg M, Palmgren PJ, Möller R. A cross-sectional study of clinical learning environments across four undergraduate programs using the undergraduate clinical education environment measure. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02687-8

Edelbring S, Dastmalchi M, Hult H, Lundberg IE, Dahlgren LO. Experiencing virtual patients in clinical learning: a phenomenological study. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2011 Aug 9;16(3):331–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9265-0

Continuing Professional Development Of Medical Doctors Wfme Global Standards For Quality Improvement. https://formacionenradiologia.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/wfme-2015-continuing-professional-development.pdf

Vieira JE, Machado JLM, Ribeiro SMA. Assessment of the Environment with DREEM at a Medical School Using Active Methodologies and an Integrated Curriculum. Creat Educ. 2015;06(17):1920–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.617198

Fazendeiro M. Perceções dos Estudantes de Medicina acerca do Ambiente Educativo da Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde. [Covilhã]: Universidade da Beira Interior; 2011. https://ubibliorum.ubi.pt/handle/10400.6/923?locale=pt_PT

Lund University Library. UCEEM . [cited 2023 Apr 26]. Available from: https://libguides.lub.lu.se/c.php?g=661963&p=4677633

Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):435-441. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021

Gjersing L, Caplehorn JR, Clausen T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:13. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-13

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-3191. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the Performance of Maximum Likelihood Versus Means and Variance Adjusted Weighted Least Squares Estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302

Halcomb E, Gholizadeh L, Digiacomo M, Phillips J, Davidson P. Literature review: Considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16:1000–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x

Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. 8th ed. Hampshire, United Kingdom: CENGAGE; 2019.

Bonniga, Ravinder and Saraswathi, Dr. A.B., Literature Review Of Cronbachalphacoefficient And Mcdonald's Omega Coefficient ( 2020). European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, Volume 07, Issue 06, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4443362

Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, Scherpbier A. Experience-based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical student workplace learning. Med Educ. 2007; 41:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02652.x

Schönwetter DJ, Lavigne S, Mazurat R, Nazarko O. Students’ Perceptions of Effective Classroom and Clinical Teaching in Dental and Dental Hygiene Education. J Dent Educ. 2006; 70(6):624–35. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2006.70.6.tb04118.x

Findyartini A, Utami D. Development of Clinical Learning Environment Measure in the Undergraduate Medical Program. Adv Sci Lett. 2018; 24:6097–108. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12637