Diversidad y deliberación en entornos digitales

Autores

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.622151
Palavras-chave: deliberación, etica, diversidad

Resumo

Introducción de los editores al número monográfico "Diversidad y deliberación en entornos digitales"

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Aakhus, M., & Lewiński, M. (2017). Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy. Argumentation, 31(1), 179-207.

Aakhus, M. & Lewiński, M. (2023). Argumentation in Complex Communication. Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue, New York, Cambridge University Press.

Bail, C. (2021). Breaking the Social Media Prism. How to Make our Platforms Less

Polarizing, New York, Princeton University Press

Barberá, P et al. (2015). ‘Tweeting from Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication

More Than an Echo Chamber’, Psychological Science, 1-12.

Bakshy, E., Messing, S. & Adamic, L.A. (2015). “Exposure to Ideologically Diverse

News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science 348(6239), 1130-1132.

Brady WJ, Gantman AP, Van Bavel JJ. (2020). ‘Attentional capture helps explain why moral and emotional content go viral’. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 149 (4), pp.746-756.

Cassam, Q. (2018). Epistemic Vices, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Cassam, Q. (2020). Extremism, London, Routledge

Castells, Manuel. (2009). Comunicación y poder, Madrid: Alianza.

Castells, Manuel. (2001). La Galaxia Internet, Barcelona: Plaza y Janés.

Chadwick, A. (2017). The Hybrid Media System. Politics and Power, Oxford, Oxford University Press

Dahlgren, P. M. (2019). Selective exposure to public service news over thirty years: The role of ideological leaning, party support, and political interest. International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(3), 293–314.

Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political communication, 22(2), 147-162.

De Moragas, M. (2012) (ed.): La comunicación: de los orígenes a internet, Gedisa, Barcelona.

Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). ‘The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media’. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729–745.

Fraser, N. (1992). “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Democracy”, in Craig J Calhoun, Habermas And The Public Sphere. MIT Press.

Frost-Arnold, K. (2023). Who Should You Be Online? A Social Epistemology for the Internet, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Furman, K. (2022). ‘Epistemic Bunkers’, Social Epistemology, Vol. 37, 2, pp. 197-207.

Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). ‘Ideological segregation online and offline’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839.

Habgood-Coote, J., Ashton, N. A. & El Kassar, N., (2024) “Receptive Publics”, Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy 11: 5. doi: https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.5710

Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39.

Kotsonis, A. (2020). Social media as inadvertent educators. Journal of Moral Education, 51(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2020.1838267

Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oup Oxford.

Levy, N. 2021. Bad Beliefs, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Loader, B. D., y Mercea, D. (2011), “Networking Democracy? Social Media Innovations and Participatory Politics.” Information, Communication and Society, 14 (6), pp.757-769.

Marsili, N. (2021). ‘Retweeting: Its Linguistic and Epistemic Value’, Synthese, 198, 10457-10483

Mason, L. 2018. Uncivil Agreement, New York, Princeton University Press.

Negroponte, Nicholas.(1995). Being Digital. United States: Alfred A. Knopf.

Osorio, J. Villanueva, N. (2019). ‘Expressivism and Crossed Disagreements’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 86, pp. 111-132.

Owen, Taylor, (2015) Disruptive Power: The Crisis of the State in the Digital Age, Oxford University Press, Oxford / Nueva York.

Parisier, Eli. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What Is the Internet Is Hiding from You.

The Penguin Press.

Sanders, L. M. (1997). Against Deliberation. Political Theory, 25(3), 347-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591797025003002

Scanlon, T. (1972). “A Theory of Freedom of Expression”, Philosophy & Public Affairs”, 1 (2), pp.204-226.

Shirky, C. (2011), “The Political Power of Social Media Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change”, Foreign Affairs, 90 (1), pp.1-9.

Sunstein, C R. (2001). Republic.Com. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Talisse, R. 2019. Overdoing Democracy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Thompson, J B. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Stanford University Press.

Tosi, J. Warmcke, B. (2020). Moral Grandstanding, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas. The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest, New Haven, Yale University Press.

Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D.,

& Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A

review of the scientific literature.

Van Bavel, J. Packer, D. 2021. The Power of Us, New York, Little Brown

Véliz, C. (2021). Privacidad es poder. Datos, vigilancia y libertad en la era digital, Madrid, Debate.

Publicado
01-09-2024
Como Citar
Gaitán Torres, A., Luengo Cruz, M., & Velasco Arias, G. (2024). Diversidad y deliberación en entornos digitales. Daimon, (93), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.622151
Edição
Secção
MONOGRÁFICO sobre «Diversidad y deliberación en entornos digitales». Introducción de los editores