Construcción, fiabilidad y evidencias de validez de una escala para medir el uso de las nuevas tecnologías por los psicólogos españoles.

Autores/as

  • Rodolfo Ramos-Álvarez (1) Dept. Psicología Social. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación y del Deporte. Universidad de Granada, Melilla (Spain) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4747-5970
  • Milagrosa Sánchez-Martín (2) Dept. de Psicología. Facultad de Psicología y Educación. Universidad Loyola Andalucía https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7387-9971
  • Mª-Mercedes Rodríguez-Ruiz (3) Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Álava, Álava (Spain)
  • Rocío Fausor (4) Dept. Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento psicológico Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid (Spain) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0309-3391
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.441181
Palabras clave: Nuevas tecnologías, Psicología, Realidad virtual, Terapia online, Uso de tecnologías

Resumen

En este estudio presentamos la construcción y análisis de un cuestionario para medir el uso de las nuevas tecnologías (NNTT) por los profesionales de la psicología, basándonos en una muestra de 1759 psicólogos y psicólogas. El conjunto de 36 ítems fue generado a partir de una revisión bibliográfica sobre las nuevas tecnologías aplicadas a la psicología. El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems seleccionados, basado en la muestra aleatorizada (n = 853), indicó la presencia de 5 factores:  1.- Almacenamiento online; 2.- Uso de herramientas básicas de ofimática e internet; 3.- Vías de comunicación con el paciente; 4.- Conocimiento básico y avanzado de lenguajes de programación y evaluación; 5.- Intervención psicológica mediante NNTT. La validez de la estructura fue apoyada por el análisis factorial confirmatorio efectuado con la muestra restante (n = 906). Los resultados sobre fiabilidad de la escala (consistencia interna) fueron adecuados. Se encuentran diferencias significativas por sexo, los hombres obtienen mayor puntuación tanto en el factor 1 como en el 3. El cuestionario desarrollado es un instrumento válido y fiable para medir el constructo planteado.

Descargas

Citas

Ak, S., Koruklu, N., & Yilmaz, Y. (2013). A study on Turkish adolescent´s internet use: possible predictors of internet addiction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 205-209.

American Psychological Association (APA) (2013). Guidelines for the practice of telepsychology. American Psychologist, 68(9), 791–800. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035001

Andersson, G., Carlbring, P., & Lindefors, N. (2016). History and Current Status of ICBT. Guided Internet-Based Treatments in Psychiatry, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06083-5_1

Banbury, A., Nancarrow, S., Dart, J., Gray, L., & Parkinson, L. (2018). Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(2), e25. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8090

Bandalos, D. L. , & Finney, S. J. (2018). Factor Analysis. The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences, 98–122. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755649-8

Barak, A. (2007). Emotional support and suicide prevention through the Internet: A field project report. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(2), 971–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.001

Barak, A., Hen, L., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Shapira, N. (2008). A Comprehensive Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 26(2-4), 109–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228830802094429

Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77-85.

Beidel, D. C., Frueh, B. C., Neer, S. M., & Lejuez, C. W. (2017). The efficacy of Trauma Management Therapy: A controlled pilot investigation of a three-week intensive outpatient program for combat-related PTSD. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 50, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.05.001

Bentler, P. M. (1977). Factor simplicity index and transformations. Psychometrika, 59, 567-579. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294054

Botella, C., Fernández-Álvarez, J., Guillén, V., García-Palacios, A., & Baños, R. (2017). Avances recientes en la terapia de exposición a la realidad virtual para las fobias: una revisión sistemática. Current Psychiatry Reports. 19:42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0788-4

Bouchard, S., Dumoulin, S., Robillard, G., Guitard, T., Klinger, É., Forget, H., Loranger, C., & Roucaut, F. X. (2017). Virtual reality compared with in vivo exposure in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: A three-arm randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 210(4), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.184234

Brown, S. A. (2005). Measuring perceived benefits and perceived barriers for physical activity. American Journal of Health Behavior, 29(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.29.2.2

Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.

Calvo, M. E. (2019). Científicas e inventoras a través de los cuentos. IQUAL, 2, 147-170. https://doi.org/10.6018/iqual.340701

Chen, F. (2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Science (2nd Edition). In Statistical Power Anaylsis for the Behavioral Sciences. Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

Dueber, D. M. (2017). Bifactor Indices Calculator: A Microsoft Excel-based tool to calculate various indices relevant to bifactor CFA models. https://doi.org/10.13023/edp.tool.01 [Also available at http://sites.education.uky.edu/apslab/resources/]

Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2013). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 295-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046

Encinas, F. J. L., & González, S. M. V. (2010). Menores y nuevas tecnologías: conductas indicadoras de posible problema de adicción. Psicothema, 22(2), 180-188

Espinoza, M., Baños, R. M., García-Palacios, A., & Botella, C. (2013). La realidad virtual en las intervenciones psicológicas con pacientes oncológicos. Psicooncología, 10(2-3). https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_psic.2013.v10.n2-3.43447

Fernández, C. S., & Alcalde, J. B. F. (2015). No, sin mi móvil. Diferencias de género y uso de las nuevas tecnologías. ICONO 14, Revista de comunicación y tecnologías emergentes, 13(1), 208-246.

Fernández-Luque, L., & Bau, T. (2015). Health and Social Media: Perfect Storm of Information. Healthcare Informatics Research, 21(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2015.21.2.67

Ferrando, P. J. & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: algunas consideraciones adicionales. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1170-1175. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199991

Ferrando, P. J. & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236-240. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.304

Finch, W. H. (2020). Using Fit Statistic Differences to Determine the Optimal Number of Factors to Retain in an Exploratory Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419865769

Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.

Gackenbach, J. (2007). Introduction. Psychology and the Internet, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012369425-6/50019-9

Gartner Symposium ITxpo (2013). https://www.gartner.com/en

Gassova, Z., & Werner-Wilson, R. J. (2018). Characteristics of e-therapy websites involving marriage and family therapists. American Journal of Family Therapy, 46(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2018.1428127

Godoe, P., & Johansen, T. S. (2012). Understanding adoption of new technologies: Technology readiness and technology acceptance as an integrated concept. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e537242013-005

Gorsuch, R. L. (2003). Factor analysis. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 143–164). John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Green, D. (2006). Ground rules in online psychotherapy (Doctoral dissertation). University London.

Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking Construct Reliability within Latent Variable Systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. S?rbom (Eds.), Structural Equation Modeling: Present und Future—A Festschrift in Honor of Karl Joreskog (pp. 195-216). Scientific Software International.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic journal of business research methods, 6(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.21427/d7cf7r

Howard, M. C. (2015). A Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis Decisions and Overview of Current Practices: What We Are Doing and How Can We Improve? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664

IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. IBM Corp

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) (2019). Encuesta sobre equipamiento y uso de tecnologías de información y comunicación en los hogares. Condiciones de vida. Nivel y condiciones de vida (IPC). INE. URL: https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176741&menu=ultiDatos&idp=1254735976608

Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401-415.

Kazdin, A. E. (2015). Technology-based interventions and reducing the burdens of mental illness: perspectives and comments on the special series. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 22(3), 359-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2015.04.004

King, R., Bambling, M., Reid, W., & Thomas, I. (2006). Telephone and online counselling for young people: A naturalistic comparison of session outcome, session impact and therapeutic alliance. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 6(3), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140600874084

Kramer, G. M., & Luxton, D. D. (2016). Telemental Health for Children and Adolescents: An Overview of Legal, Regulatory, and Risk Management Issues. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 26(3), 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2015.0018

Kysely, A., Bishop, B., Kane, R., Cheng, M., De Palma, M., & Rooney, R. (2020). Expectations and Experiences of Couples Receiving Therapy Through Videoconferencing: A Qualitative Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02992

Lai, M. H., Maniam, T., Chan, L. F., & Ravindran, A. V. (2014). Caught in the Web: A Review of Web-Based Suicide Prevention. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(1), e30. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2973

Lavorgna, L., Russo, A., De Stefano, M., Lanzillo, R., Esposito, S., Moshtari, F., Rullani, F., Piscopo, K., Buonanno, D., Brescia Morra, V., Gallo, A., Tedeschi, G., & Bonavita, S. (2017). Health-Related Coping and Social Interaction in People with Multiple Sclerosis Supported by a Social Network: Pilot Study With a New Methodological Approach. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 6(2), e10. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.7402

Lenhard, W. & Lenhard, A. (2016). Calculation of Effect Sizes. Retrieved from: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html. Dettelbach (Germany): Psychometrica. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17823.92329

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 381–5.

Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2003). A factor simplicity index. Psychometrika, 68, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02296652

Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fi t the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 88-91.

Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2019). Robust Promin: A method for diagonally weighted factor rotation. Liberabit: Revista Peruana de Psicología, 25(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n1.0

Mallen, M. J., Day, S. X., & Green, M. A. (2003). Online versus face-to-face conversation: An examination of relational and discourse variables. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 40(1-2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.40.1-2.155

Mallen, M. J., Vogel, D. L., & Rochlen, A. B. (2005). The Practical Aspects of Online Counseling. The Counseling Psychologist, 33(6), 776–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005278625

Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with Applications. Biometrika, 57, 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519

McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus User's Guide. Sixth Edition. Muthén & Muthén. Statmodel. https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/MplusUserGuideVer_8.pdf

Osborne, J. W., Costello, A. B., & Kellow, J. T. (2014). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis (pp. 86-99). Louisville, KY: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995627.d8

Palos-Sanchez, P., Reyes-Menendez, A., & Saura, J. R. (2019). Modelos de Adopción de Tecnologías de la Información y Cloud Computing en las Organizaciones. Información Tecnológica, 30(3), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-07642019000300003

Perle, J. G., Langsam, L. C., & Nierenberg, B. (2011). Controversy clarified: An updated review of clinical psychology and tele-health. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(8), 1247–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.08.003

Peter, L., Reindl, R., Zauter, S., Hillemacher, T., & Richter, K. (2019). Effectiveness of an Online CBT-I Intervention and a Face-to-Face Treatment for Shift Work Sleep Disorder: A Comparison of Sleep Diary Data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(17), 3081. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173081

Pujadas, M. M., & Machín, A. L. (2006). El correo electrónico en la relación médico-paciente: uso y recomendaciones generales. Atención primaria, 37(7), 413-417.

Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research. Developmental review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315

Richards, D., & Richardson, T. (2012). Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical psychology review, 32(4), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.004

Richards, D., & Timulak, L. (2013). Satisfaction with therapist-delivered vs. self-administered online cognitive behavioural treatments for depression symptoms in college students. British Journal of Guidance y Counselling, 41(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2012.726347

Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods 21, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045

Shore, J. H., Hilty, D. M., & Yellowlees, P. (2007). Emergency management guidelines for telepsychiatry. General Hospital Psychiatry, 29(3), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.01.013

Sohn, S. Y., Rees, P., Wildridge, B., Kalk, N. J., & Carter, B. (2019). Prevalence of problematic smartphone usage and associated mental health outcomes amongst children and young people: a systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE of the evidence. BMC psychiatry, 19(1), 1-10.

Soto-Pérez, F., Franco, M., Monardes, C. y Jiménez, F. (2010). Internet y psicología clínica : revisión de las ciber-terapias. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.15.num.1.2010.4082

Spijkerman, M. P. J., Pots, W. T. M., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2016). Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clinical Psychology Review, 45, 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.009

Stoll, J., Müller, J. A., & Trachsel, M. (2020). Ethical Issues in Online Psychotherapy: A Narrative Review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00993

Svetina, D., Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2019): Multiple-Group Invariance with Categorical Outcomes Using Updated Guidelines: An Illustration Using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools Packages. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 0, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776

Tiainem, T., & Berki, E. (2019). The re-Production process of gender bias: A case of ICT professors through recruitment in a gender-neutral country. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 170-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1351428

Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353

Vaquerizo, E. J. (2019). Eficacia de las intervenciones online basadas en redes sociales para promover actividades físicas. Lecturas: Educación Física y Deportes, 24(251), 124-136.)

Viladrich, V., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Eduardo, D. (2017). A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Anales de Psicología, 33(3), 755-782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401

Villadangos, S. M., & Labrador, F. J. (2009). Menores y nuevas tecnologías (NT): uso o abuso. Anuario de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud, 5(1), 75-83.

Wallin, E. E. K., Mattsson, S., & Olsson, E. M. G. (2016). The preference for internet-based psychological interventions by individuals without past or current use of mental health treatment delivered online: a survey study with mixed-methods analysis. JMIR mental health, 3(2), e25. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.5324

Wechsler, T. F., Kümpers, F., & Mühlberger, A. (2019). Inferiority or Even Superiority of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in Phobias? — A Systematic Review and Quantitative Meta-Analysis on Randomized Controlled Trials Specifically Comparing the Efficacy of Virtual Reality Exposure to Gold Standard in vivo Exposure in Agoraphobia, Specific Phobia, and Social Phobia. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01758

Witt, K., Spittal, M. J., Carter, G., Pirkis, J., Hetrick, S., Currier, D., … Milner, A. (2017). Effectiveness of online and mobile telephone applications (“apps”) for the self-management of suicidal ideation and self-harm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1458-0

Wittkopf, P. G., Lloyd, D. M., & Johnson, M. I. (2018). Managing limb pain using virtual reality: a systematic review of clinical and experimental studies. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(26), 3103–3117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1485183

Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

Zaccaria, D., Casanova, G., & Guaita, A. (2019). Impact of ICT and social networks sites utilization on older people’s well-being and loneliness: a scoping review. Innovation in Aging, 3(Supplement_1), S530–S530. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.1949

Publicado
27-04-2023
Cómo citar
Ramos-Álvarez, R., Sánchez-Martín, M., Rodríguez-Ruiz, M.-M., & Fausor, R. (2023). Construcción, fiabilidad y evidencias de validez de una escala para medir el uso de las nuevas tecnologías por los psicólogos españoles. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 39(2), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.441181
Número
Sección
Psicología y práctica profesional

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2,4 promedio

Reviewer profiles  N/D

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/D
32% con financiadores
Competing interests 
N/D
11%
Metric
Para esta revista
Other journals
Articles accepted 
Artículos aceptados: 52%
33% aceptado
Days to publication 
967
145

Indexado: {$indexList}

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/D
Editora: 
Editum - Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (España)

PFL

1 2 3 4 5
Not useful Very useful