VIEWS ON LEARNING IN DIFFERENT CULTURES. COMPARING PATTERNS IN CHINA AND URUGUAY
Abstract
This paper reports findings from a comparative study of conceptions of learning amongst Chinese and Uruguayan students. The results were obtained through reanalyzing the interview data of two independent studies. This comparative re-analysis was undertaken in line with the general framework proposed by Marton, Watkins and Tang (in press) in which different conceptions of learning are structured along two dimensions, i.e. a temporal dimension (acquiring-knowing-applying) and depth of learning (surface-deep). The results showed that both Chinese and Uruguayan students emphasized the acquisition phase of learning and furthermore, they shared the view that learning was always initiated by obtained knowledge. However, almost none of the subjects explained how they went about the initial action of learning. The views expressed by the two groups appeared contradictory in many cases but turned out to be complementary once they were seen in terms of the aforesaid framework. The Chinese students tended to emphasize the on-going aspect of learning and Uruguayans the act of making the knowledge obtained permanent within themselves. The Chinese students singled out the act of committing what they have read or told to their memory as a necessary step in learning while the Uruguayan students didn‘t think such a conscious act was necessary because keeping things in the memory was regarded as a natural byproduct of learning. The Chinese students stressed outer behaviors such as repeated practice more and the Uruguayan students inner behaviors such as assimilating, incorporating and selfexperiencing. Finally, the Chinese students saw memorization as being of two kinds: mechanical and meaningful, the latter being interrelated with understanding, while the Uruguayan students simply equated memorization with rote learning and saw it as opposite to understanding.Downloads
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.