Regulación de la cognición: validación de una escala corta para estudiantes universitarios portugueses de primer año.

Autores/as

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.389361
Palabras clave: regulación de la cognición, enseñanza superior, validación de instrumentos, aprendizaje

Resumen

La calidad del aprendizaje en la Educación Superior depende, especialmente, de las habilidades de los estudiantes para regular su cognición. Esta regulación requiere habilidades cognitivas y metacognitivas, así como dimensiones motivacionales. Dada su relevancia en el rendimiento académico y el desarrollo de habilidades para el aprendizaje a lo largo de la vida, es importante aumentar la investigación en el campo. Este estudio pretende adaptar y validar una versión abreviada da dimensión Regulación de la Cognición del Metacognitive Awareness Inventory para estudiantes universitarios portugueses de primer año. Se empleó una muestra de 360 estudiantes y se identificó una estructura tridimensional (Planificación, 4 ítems; Estrategias, 7 ítems; y Monitoreo y evaluación, 7 ítems) con un factor de segundo orden (Regulación de la cognición). Los valores de consistencia interna de la escala reducida son aceptables para una escala de autoinforme y las correlaciones con el logro académico al final del primer año de la universidad garantizan su validez predictiva. Esta versión abreviada para medir la regulación de la cognición puede usarse en investigación junto con otros instrumentos en estudios más amplios y puede funcionar como una herramienta de diagnóstico para ayudar a los estudiantes en los desafíos de aprendizaje de la enseñanza superior.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Adabaş, A., & Kaygin, H. (2016). Lifelong learning key competence levels of graduate students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(12A), 31–38. doi:10.13189/ujer.2016.041305

Akin, A., Abaci, R., & Cetin, B. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(2), 671–678.

Artzt, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 137–175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0902_3

Bártolo-Ribeiro, R., Simões, M., & Almeida, L. (2016). Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI): Adaptação e validação da versão Portuguesa [Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI): Adaptation and Validation of Portuguese Version]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación, 2(42), 69–83. doi:10.21865/RIDEP42

Bernacki, M. (2018). Examining the cyclical, loosely sequenced, and contingent features of self-regulated learning: Trace data and their analysis. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Cornoldi, C., Carretti, B., Drusi, S., & Tencati, C. (2015). Improving problem solving in primary school students: The effect of a training programme focusing on metacognition and working memory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424–439. doi:10.1111/bjep.12083

Donker, A. S., De Boer, H., Kostons, D., van Ewijk, C. D., & Van der Werf, M. P. C. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1–26. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002

Efklides, A., Schwartz, B. L., & Brown, V. (2018). Motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: Does metacognition play a role? In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Evers, A., Hagemeister, C., Høstmælingen, A., Lindley, P., Muñiz, J., & Sjöberg, A. (2013). EFPA review model for the description and evaluation of psychological and educational tests. Test review form and notes for reviewers. Version 4.2.6.

Fernández, E., Bernardo, G. A. B., Suárez, N., Cerezo, R., Núñez, J. C., & Rosário, P. (2013). Predicción del uso de estrategias de autorregulación en la educación superior: Un análisis a nivel individual y de contexto. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 865–875. doi:10.6018/analesps.29.3.139341

Ferradás, M. del M., Freire, C., & Piñeiro, S. R. E. I. (2018). Self-handicapping and self-esteem profiles and their relation to achievement goals. Anales de Psicologia, 34(3), 545–554. doi:10.6018/analesps.34.3.319781

Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillside: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Greene, J. A., Deekens, V. M., Copeland, D. Z., & Yu, S. (2018). Capturing and modeling self-regulated learning using think-aloud protocols. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self- regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Guerrero, A., Pérez, J., Contreras, M., & Vega, H. (2013). Composición factorial de una escala de autoeficacia en conductas académicas en universitarios de ingeniería [Factor structure of an self-efficacy scale in academic behavior on university student’s of engineering]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 35(1), 77–93.

Gully, S., & Chen, G. (2010). Individual differences, attribute-treatment interactions, and training outcomes. In S. J. Kozlowski, & E. Salas (Eds.), Learning, training, and development in organizations (pp. 3–64). New York, NY US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2007). Self-confidence and metacognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 161–173. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.004

Kline, T. J. B. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA US: Sage Publications.

Kline, R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Larsen, M. R., Sommersel, H. B., & Larsen, M. S. (2013). Evidence on dropout phenomena at universities. Copenhagen: AARHUS University.

Magno, C. (2009). Developing and Assessing Self-Regulated Learning. In The Assessment Handbook: Continuing Education Program (Vol. 1, pp. 26–41) Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1426045

Marinho-Araújo, C. M., & Almeida, L. S. (2016). Approach to competences, human development and higher education. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 32, 1-9. doi:10.1590/0102-3772e32ne212

Michalski, T., Zion, M., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2007). Developing students’ metacognitive awareness in asynchronous learning networks in comparison to face-to-face discussion groups. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36, 421–450.

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Ozturk, N. (2017). Assessing metacognition: Theory and practices. International Journal Assessement Tools in Education, 4(2), 134–148. doi:10.21449/ijate.298299

Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in Education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

Rezvan, S., Ahmadh, S., & Abedi, M. (2006). The effect of metacognition training on the academic achievement and happiness of Esfahan University conditional students. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 19(4), 415–428.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475. doi:10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive Theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.

Shamir, A., Mevarech, Z. R., & Gida, C. (2009). The assessment of meta-cognition in different contexts: Individualized vs. peer-assisted learning. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 47–61.

Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 306–314.

Teng, F. (2017). The effects of task-induced involvement load on word learning and confidence judgments mediated by knowledge and regulation of cognition. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(3), 791–808. doi:10.12738/estp.2017.3.0167

Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125.

Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 159–176. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2004.12.001

Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afferbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D., & Schulte, A. C. (1987). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 307–313.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217–221. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3004_8

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attainment of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628. doi:10.3102/00028312023004614

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman, D. H. Schunk, B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Publicado
09-04-2020
Cómo citar
Bártolo-Ribeiro, R., Peixoto, F., Casanova, J., & Almeida, L. (2020). Regulación de la cognición: validación de una escala corta para estudiantes universitarios portugueses de primer año. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 36(2), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.389361
Número
Sección
Psicología evolutiva y de la educación

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2,4 promedio

Reviewer profiles  N/D

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/D
32% con financiadores
Competing interests 
N/D
11%
Metric
Para esta revista
Other journals
Articles accepted 
Artículos aceptados: 52%
33% aceptado
Days to publication 
271
145

Indexado: {$indexList}

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/D
Editora: 
Editum - Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (España)