Integrating generative artificial intelligence tools into logistics instruction in upper secondary school
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has become a strategic resource in logistics education by facilitating the understanding of complex concepts and strengthening the development of technical competencies. This study analyzes, through a quantitative comparative design with repeated measures, the perceptions of 34 upper secondary education students (third semester of the Technical Logistics program, CETAC 06, Guanajuato, Mexico; aged 16–19) following an educational intervention with three GAI tools: ChatGPT, Canva AI, and VideoMaker. A validated instrument (α = 0.96) measuring usefulness, dependence, teacher training, and recommendation was applied. Due to the ordinal nature of the data and the lack of normality (Shapiro–Wilk test, p < 0.05), nonparametric methods were employed: Friedman test, post hoc Wilcoxon comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment, and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W). The results show statistically significant differences among the tools (χ²(2) = 16.42, p < 0.001), with ChatGPT achieving the highest median (42.5) and the lowest dispersion (IQR = 5.5). Canva (median 39.0, IQR = 9.0) and VideoMaker (median 40.0, IQR = 10.5) showed no significant differences between them (p = 1.000). The effect size was small (W = 0.241). A notable technological dependence on ChatGPT was identified, along with the need to strengthen teacher training to promote a more critical and reflective pedagogical integration. It is concluded that GAI is perceived as useful in logistics teaching, but its implementation should be accompanied by instructional strategies that foster student autonomy, critical thinking, and the verification of results. Future research should extend this line through longitudinal studies with larger samples and objective learning measurements.
Downloads
-
Abstract0
-
PDF (Español (España))0
References
Álvarez, M. A. M., Batista, M. Á. H. y Gutiérrez, A. A. (2023). La inteligencia artificial en la generación de imágenes: Consideraciones desde el diseño, la comunicación y el arte. South Florida Journal of Development, 4(9), 3713–3728. https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv4n9-028
Behforouz, B. y Al Ghaithi, A. (2024). Grammar gains: Transforming EFL learning with ChatGPT. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(4), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.134.2
Boršoš, P. y Koman, G. (2025). Overview of current research on artificial intelligence in logistics. LOGI: Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, 16(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.2478/logi-2025-0002
Cerero, J. F., Ballesta, N. M. M., García, P. H. y Rueda, M. M. (2023). Impacto de la inteligencia artificial en el ámbito educativo. En J.M. Fernández-Campoy, J.P. Catalán, C.A. Muñoz y P. Ayllón (Coord.), Investigación educativa para la innovación de las TIC aplicadas a la enseñanza de la sociedad del conocimiento (p. 47-52). Dykinson. https://bit.ly/42YZBEp
Coeckelbergh, M. (2023). Narrative responsibility and artificial intelligence: How AI challenges human responsibility and sense-making. AI & Society, 38(6), 2437–2450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01375-x
Diego Olite, F. M., Morales Suárez, I. D. R. y Vidal Ledo, M. J. (2023). ChatGPT: Origen, evolución, retos e impactos en la educación. Educación Médica Superior, 37(2). https://bit.ly/4o4lASO
Esteve Sendra, C., Tomás Miralles, A. y Irving Hernández, O. (2024). Tecnología creativa: La revolución de la inteligencia artificial en la exploración artística. En J. Albar (Coord.), Innovación y expresión: Un recorrido por las artes, la cultura visual y la inteligencia artificial en la era digital (pp. 1370–1401). https://bit.ly/4oF797t
Franganillo, J. (2023). La inteligencia artificial generativa y su impacto en la creación de contenidos mediáticos. Methaodos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 11(2), m231102a10. https://doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v11i2.710
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2023). La percepción de la inteligencia artificial en contextos educativos tras el lanzamiento de ChatGPT: Disrupción o pánico. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 24, e31279. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279
Gómez Gómez, H. y Rubio Tamayo, J. L. (2023). Algoritmografía, hito y fenómeno en la producción de imágenes fijas en la era digital: Resignificación de la noción de la imagen fotográfica y proyección del medio en un contexto de producción de imágenes con inteligencia artificial y machine learning. Visual Review: International Visual Culture Review/Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v10.4607
Jiménez Linares, L., López-Gómez, J. A., Martín-Baos, J. Á., Romero, F. P. y Serrano-Guerrero, J. (2023). ChatGPT: Reflexiones sobre la irrupción de la inteligencia artificial generativa en la docencia universitaria. https://bit.ly/4nmabfV
Knight, S., Dickson-Deane, C., Heggart, K., Kitto, K., Kozanoğlu, D. C., Maher, D., ... y Zarrabi, F. (2023). Generative AI in the Australian education system: An open data set of stakeholder recommendations and emerging analysis from a public inquiry. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8922
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L. y Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. Relc Journal, 54(2), 537-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Long, D. y Magerko, B. (2020, April). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Mollick, E. R. y Mollick, L. (2023). Using AI to implement effective teaching strategies: Five strategies, including prompts. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4391243
Navarro, J. R. S., Pérez, Y. S., Bravo, D. D. P. y Núñez, M. D. J. C. (2023). Incidencias de la inteligencia artificial en la educación contemporánea. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, (77), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.3916/C77-2023-08
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W. y Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Orellana, J. S., Cordero, C. A. y Espinoza, J. C. (2024). Validación del cuestionario para docentes: Percepción sobre el uso de ChatGPT en la educación superior. Revista Andina de Educación, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.2024.8.1.
Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., ... y Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. En Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 33–44). https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372873
Rodríguez Guardado, M. D. S. y Platas-García, A. (2022). Uso de videos tutoriales en el proceso de aprendizaje de estudiantes universitarios. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 24, e21. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2022.24.e21.4176
Sajja, R., Sermet, Y., Cwiertny, D. y Demir, I. (2025). Integrating AI and learning analytics for data-driven pedagogical decisions and personalized interventions in education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09897-9
Sánchez, M. D. G. (2023). El abordaje de ChatGPT: El “rinoceronte gris” de la IA conversacional. Ius et Scientia, 9(1), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.12795/iestscientia.2023.i01.04
Saz-Pérez, F. y Pizà-Mir, B. (2024). Desafiando el estado del arte en el uso de ChatGPT en educación en el año 2023. REIRE Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire.44018
Saravia-Rojas, M. Á. y Geng-Vivanco, R. (2023). ChatGPT e inteligencia artificial para la educación universitaria y su impacto en la odontología: Retos y oportunidades. Revista Estomatológica Herediana, 33(4), 377–379. https://doi.org/10.20453/reh.v33i2.4516
Shatat, A. S. y Shatat, A. S. (2024). Artificial intelligence competencies in logistics management: An empirical insight from Bahrain. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 23(1), 2350059. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649223500594
Sanusi, I. T., Olaleye, S. A., Agbo, F. J. y Chiu, T. K. (2022). The role of learners’ competencies in artificial intelligence education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100098
Copyright (c) 2026 Cinhtia Maribel González Segura, Abraham Rocha Gallegos , Michel García García

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms:
a. The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License. Non-commercial attribution 4.0 International that allows to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt, remix, transform and build on the material in the following terms:
Recognition - You must give the appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in a way that suggests that the licensor or its use endorses it. Non-commercial - You cannot use the material for commercial purposes. Share under it - If you remix, transform, or create on the material, your contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published work (e.g. deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) whenever the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to distribute their work through the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
d. In any case, the Editorial Team understands that the opinions expressed by the authors are their exclusive responsibility.

