Integration of digital technology in the classroom: Design of an online training proposal from a reflective practice perspective
Abstract
Faced with the need to create spaces or contexts, both formal and informal, that involve a real connection between teachers and their environment, a proposal for a learning experience designed for Initial Teacher Training (ITT) on reflective thinking, integration of digital technology in the classroom and the Teaching Digital Competence (TDC) of Pedagogy students in Chile. This proposal focuses on pedagogical reflection circles with the main objective of exploring how reflective practice is built during online interactions, specifically asynchronous sessions through discussion forums, through the analysis of the discourse of the content generated in them. and if it turns out to be an effective strategy for the development of reflective thinking skills when analyzing teaching practices around the integration of digital technologies in the classroom. Preliminarily finding four categories when justifying by the students about which definition of reflection they most identify. And alluding to the fact that when they reflect on their teaching work when integrating digital technologies in the classroom, they do so mainly on the dimensions of the content and students, being to a lesser extent the socio-political context.
Downloads
References
Ávalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Ballesteros, B. (2014). Introducción al análisis de contenido. Taller de Investigación Cualitativa. UNED.
Bauman, Z. (2013). Sobre la educación en un mundo líquido. Paidos.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
Boyd, E. M., & Fales, A. W. (1983). Reflective Learning: Key to Learning from Experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167883232011
Cisterna, F. (2005). Categorización y triangulación como procesos de validación del conocimiento en investigación cualitativa. Theoria, 14(1), 61-71. https://cutt.ly/kTLFGuw
Clarke, D. & Roche, A. (2018). Using contextualized tasks to engage students in meaningful and worthwhile mathematics learning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.006
Collin, S., Karsenti, T. & Komis, V. (2012). Reflective Practice in Initial Teacher Training: Critiques and perspectives. Reflective Practice, 14(1), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2012.732935
Correa-Molina, E., Chaubet, P., Collin, S. & Gervais, C. (2014). Desafíos metodológicos para el estudio de la reflexión en contexto de formación docente. Estudios pedagógicos (Valdivia), 40(Especial), 71-86. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052014000200005
De Pablos Pons, J. (2018). Las tecnologías digitales y su impacto en la Universidad. Las nuevas mediaciones. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(2), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.2.20733
Dewey, J. (1989). Cómo pensamos. Nueva exposición de la relación entre pensamiento reflexivo y proceso educativo. Paidós.
Franklin, E. (2008). Diseño y evaluación de un programa de competencias docentes para profesores de la Universidad Metropolitana [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Sevilla].
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Sced.
Gros, B., & Silva, J. (2006). El problema del análisis de las discusiones asincrónicas en el aprendizaje colaborativo mediado. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 16, 1-16. https://cutt.ly/blwMjDQ
Gutiérrez Brito, J. (2002). Elementos no-técnicos para la conducción de un grupo de discusión. Empiria. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, 0(4), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.4.2001.881
Harris, J., Grandgenett, N. & Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACK-Based Technology Integration Assessment Rubric. En Gibson, D. & Dodge, B. (Eds.) (2010). Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International. [Conferencia] Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, San Diego, Estados Unidos. Recuperado de: https://cutt.ly/elw4l1L
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2017). ISTE Standards for Educators. https://cutt.ly/VlIC8La
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2018). ISTE Standards for Education Leaders. https://cutt.ly/IlIVOx4
Jay, J. K. & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: a typology ofreflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.556
Jocson, K.M. (2016). Ripples and Breaks: Reflecting on Learning Ecologies in Career and Technical Education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 47, 444-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12170
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching, 25(4), 85-118.
Kitchen, J. & Petrarca, D. (2016). Approaches to teacher education. En J. Loughran y L. Hamilton (Eds.), Inter-national handbook of teacher education (pp. 137-185). Springer.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Korthagen, F. A. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Larrivee, B. (2004). Assessing teacher´s level of reflective practice as a tool for change. [Conferencia] International Conference on Reflective Practice, Gloucester, Reino Unido.
Llopis-Nebot, M.Á., Adell, J., & Sanchiz Ruiz, M.L. (2014). En busca de la reflexión. Una rúbrica para portafolios digitales [Comunicación]. En XVII Congreso Internacional-Córdoba-España 2014: El hoy y el mañana junto a las TIC (pp. 400–410). EDUTEC. https://cutt.ly/NTXQLmo
López-Aguilar, E. (2014). Com-tendencias: ¡Se llevan las TIC! Educación3.0. Recuperado de: https://cutt.ly/ulIW3zp
Martínez-Bonafé, J. & Rogero-Anaya, J. (2021). El entorno y la innovación educativa. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 19(4), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2021.19.4.004
Mason, K. O. & Klein, S. R. (2013). Land, sea and sky: mapmaking as reflection in pre-service teacher education, Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 14(2), 209-22. http://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2012.749228
Ministerio Nacional de Educación de Colombia (2013). Competencias TIC para el desarrollo profesional docente. https://cutt.ly/BlIZiHa
OCDE (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. Directorate for Education and Skills-OECD. https://cutt.ly/HlILdVP
OCDE (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
Orden ECD/65/2015, de 21 de enero, por la que se describen las relaciones entre las competencias, los contenidos y los criterios de evaluación de la educación primaria, la educación secundaria obligatoria y el bachillerato. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 25, de 29 de enero de 2015, 6986-7003. https://cutt.ly/mlIJO2b
Orellana García, P. (2016). La Discusión grupal y el marco mayéutico como contextos para el desarrollo de habilidades argumentativas. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 15(28), 55- 70. https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.20162855703
Osuna-Acedo, S., Marta-Lazo, C., & Frau-Meigs, D. (2018). De sMOOC a tMOOC, el aprendizaje hacia la transferencia profesional: El proyecto europeo ECO. Comunicar, 55, 105-114. https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-10
Paniagua, A. & Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as Designers of Learning Environments: The Importance of Innovative Pedagogies. Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085374-en
Patton, K. & Parker M. (2014). Teacher education communities of practice: More than a culture of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education 67, 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.013
Perrenoud, P. (2001). La formación de los docentes en el siglo XXI. Revista de Tecnología Educativa, 14, 3, 503-523.
Puentedura, R. (2020, January 14). SAMR – A Research Perspective. Hippasus. Recuperado de: https://cutt.ly/mlIwxZA
Rapley, T. (2014). Los análisis de la conversación, del discurso y de documentos en investigación cualitativa. Colección: investigación cualitativa de Uwe Flick. Morata.
Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Ryan, M. (ed.) (2015). Teaching Reflective Learning in Higher Education. A Systematic Approach Using Pedagogic Patterns. Springer.
Salinas, J. (2004). Innovación docente y uso de las TIC en la enseñanza universitaria. Revista Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento. RUSC. 1 (1), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v1i1.228
Salinas, J. (2008). Innovación educativa y uso de las TIC. Universidad Internacional de Andalucía.
Sanjurjo, L. O. (2002). La formación práctica de los docentes. Reflexión y acción en el aula. Homo Sapiens.
Schön, D.A. (1992). La formación de profesionales reflexivos. Hacia un nuevo diseño de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje en las profesiones. Paidós.
Strampel, K. & Oliver, R. (2008). We've thrown away the pens, but are they learning? Using blogs in higher education. Proceedings ascilite (pp. 992-1001). Melbourne. https://cutt.ly/fT20aNu
Vaillant, D. & Marcelo, C. (2021). Formación inicial del profesorado: Modelo actual y llaves para el cambio. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 19(4), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2021.19.4.003
Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). El discurso como interacción social. Estudios sobre el discurso II. Una introducción multidisciplinaria. Gedisa.
Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero, S. & Van den Brande, L. (2016). DIGCOMP 2.0: The Digital Competence. Framework for Citizens. Comisión Europea. JRC Science Hub. ghttps://cutt.ly/3lITV2g
Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2021 Francisco Recio-Muñoz, Jorge Joo Nagata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms:
a. The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License. Non-commercial attribution 4.0 International that allows to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt, remix, transform and build on the material in the following terms:
Recognition - You must give the appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in a way that suggests that the licensor or its use endorses it. Non-commercial - You cannot use the material for commercial purposes. Share under it - If you remix, transform, or create on the material, your contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published work (e.g. deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) whenever the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to distribute their work through the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
d. In any case, the Editorial Team understands that the opinions expressed by the authors are their exclusive responsibility.
