Teachers’ perspectives regarding the use and efficacy of ICT resources focused on collaborative learning, creativity and entrepreneurship promotion
Abstract
The emerging pedagogies present the teacher as a designer of learning activities enhanced by the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), being their abilities decisive in the implementation of these activities. For this reason, the Teachers’ Digital Competence together with the teachers’ perceptions regarding the level of effectiveness of the techniques used to promote cross-cutting competencies at present, such as collaborative learning, creativity or entrepreneurial spirit by means of technological resources, are essential elements when analysing the use of these tools with educational aims. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is the analysis of the use of ICT resources by teachers to promote collaborative learning, creativity and entrepreneurial spirit, as well as the level of effectiveness that teachers give to the technological tools used in the classroom. In order to do so, a survey with teachers in Primary and Secondary Education, concretely from the region of Murcia (Spain), has been conducted. The results show that the technological resources used are more focused on the promotion of collaborative learning and creativity, with the development of the entrepreneurial spirit remaining in the background. Regarding the teacher’s perceptions related to the level of effectiveness of the technological resources used, teachers consider that the technological tools used in the classroom encourage the collaborative learning and creativity to a great extent and the entrepreneurial spirit to a lesser extent. In the conclusions the importance of the teacher’s role as facilitator of knowledge by means of technological tools and their pedagogical, technological and cognitive training are highlighted as key elements for the success in the promotion of these skills in the school.
Downloads
References
Area, M. (2011). Las políticas de un “ordenador por niño” en España. Visiones y prácticas del profesorado ante el programa Escuela 2.0. Un análisis comparado entre comunidades autónomas. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación.
Area, M., Alonso, C., Correa, J. M., Moral, M. E. De Pablos, J. D., Paredes, J. ... & Valverde, J. (2014). Las políticas educativas TIC en España después del Programa Escuela 2.0: las tendencias que emergen. RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 13 (2), 11-34. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.13.2.11
Arruti, A. (2016). El desarrollo del perfil del Teacherpreneur o profesor-emprendedor en el currículum del Grado de Educación Primaria: ¿un concepto de moda o una realidad?. Contextos Educativos, 19, 177-194. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.2770
Bacigalupo, M., Kampylis, P., Punie, Y. & Van den Brande, G. (2016). EntreComp: The Entrepreneurship Competence Framework. Publication Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/593884
Barab, S.A., Hay, K.E., Barnett, M. & Squire, K. (2001). Constructing Virtual Worlds: Tracing the Historical Development of Learner Practices. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 47-94. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1901_2
Barkley, E.F., Cross, K.P. & Major, C.H. (2007). Técnicas de aprendizaje colaborativo: Manual para el profesorado universitario. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. Ediciones Morata.
Barnes, N., Fives, H. & Dacey, C. (2017). U.S. teachers’ conceptions of the purposes of assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 107-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.017
Basilotta, V. & Herrada, G. (2013). Aprendizaje a través de proyectos colaborativos con TIC. Análisis de dos experiencias en el contexto educativo. EDUTEC, Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 44. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2013.44.324
Briasco, I. (2016). El desafío de emprender en el siglo XXI: Herramientas para desarrollar la competencia emprendedora. Narcea Ediciones.
Bond, M. (2021). Schools and emergency remote education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A living rapid systematic review. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15 (2), 191-147. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4425683
Casanova, O. & Serrano, R.M. (2016). Internet, tecnología y aplicaciones para la educación musical universitaria del siglo XXI. REDU: Revista de docencia Universitaria, 14(1), 405-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/redu.2016.5801
Castañeda, L., Salinas, J. & Adell, J. (2020). Hacia una visión contemporánea de la Tecnología Educativa. Digital Education Review, 37. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.240-268
Colas-Bravo, P., De Pablos-Pons, J. & Ballesta-Pagan, J. (2018). Incidencia de las TIC en la enseñanza en el sistema educativo español: una revisión de la investigación. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red/56/2
Comisión Europea (2012). Plan de acción sobre emprendimiento 2020. Relanzar el espíritu emprendedor en Europa. https://bit.ly/3Dinqbi
Comisión Europea (2013). Entrepreneurship Education: A Guide for Educators. https://doi.org/10.2769/51003
Comisión Europea (2020). Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027: Resetting education and training for the digital age. https://bit.ly/3HqB3YA
Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M.B. & Kloos, C.D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002
Fernández, T. (2012). Aprendizaje colaborativo y uso de las redes sociales en educación primaria. Revista Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura, 25, 157-187. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_DIDA.2013.v25.42240
Fernández, F.J., Fernández, M.J. & Rodríguez, J.M. (2018). El proceso de integración y uso pedagógico de las TIC en los centros educativos madrileños. Educación XX1, 21(2), 395-416. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.17907
Gibb, A. (2008). Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Education in Schools and Colleges: Insights from UK Practice. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 6, 1-48. https://bit.ly/3qFV3jJ
Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., Braak, J. & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51, 1499-1509. https://doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001
Iborra, A., & Izquierdo, M. (2010). ¿Cómo afrontar la evaluación del aprendizaje colaborativo? Una propuesta valorando el proceso, el contenido y el producto de la actividad grupal. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 20, 221-241. https://bit.ly/3kFWvyR
INTEF (Ed.) (2017). Marco Común de Competencia Digital Docente. https://bit.ly/2RdzMOW
König, J. & Blömeke, S. (2012). Future Teachersö General Pedagogical Knowledge from Comparative Perspective. Does School Experience Matter? ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 341-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0394-1
Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la mejora de la calidad educativa. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 295, de 10 de diciembre de 2013, 97858-97921. https://bit.ly/3Ci48BM
Losada, D., Correa, J. M. & Fernández, L. (2017). El impacto del modelo «un ordenador por niño» en la Educación Primaria: Un estudio de caso. Educación XX1, 20(1), 339-361. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.17515
Loveless, A., Burton, J. & Turvey, K. (2006). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting conditions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2005.07.001
Marín, S. & Moreno, I. (2007). La educación y el espíritu emprendedor. En Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. Instituto Superior de Formación del Profesorado. Las competencias profesionales relacionadas con las TIC (pp. 9-68). Secretaría General Técnica.
Miralles, P., Gómez, C.J. & Monteagudo, J. (2019). Percepciones sobre el uso de recursos TIC y «mass-media» para la enseñanza de la historia. Un estudio comparativo en futuros docentes de España-Inglaterra. Educación XX1, 22(2), 187-211. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.21377
Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028
Redecker, C. & Punie, Y. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. http://dx.doi.org/10.2760/178382
Salinas, J. (2020). Educación en tiempos de pandemia: tecnologías digitales en la mejora de los procesos educativos. Innovaciones educativas, 22 suppl.1. http://dx.doi.org/10.22458/ie.v22iespecial.3173
Sarracino, F. (2014). ¿Mejora la realidad aumentada el aprendizaje de los alumnos? Una propuesta de experiencia de museo aumentado. Profesorado. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 18(3), 1-18. https://bit.ly/30wtXRB
Sosa, M. J., & Valverde, J. (2017). Las macro-políticas educativas y el Proyecto de Educación Digital para la integración de las tecnologías desde la visión del profesorado. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), (53). https://bit.ly/3osj3o1
Tondeur, J., Braak, J., Ertmer, P. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 3, 555-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
Valiente, O. (2011). Los modelos 1:1 en educación. Prácticas internacionales, evidencia comparada e implicaciones políticas. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 56, 113-134. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie560513
Valverde, J. (2012). Políticas educativas en tecnología educativa: el papel de la investigación y la autonomía del centro en la toma de decisiones. Campus Virtuales, 1(1). https://bit.ly/3qDKWvX
Valverde, J., Garrido, M.C. & Sosa, M.J. (2010). Políticas educativas para la integración de las TIC en Extremadura y sus efectos sobre la innovación didáctica y el proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje: la percepción del profesorado. Revista de Educación, 352, 99-124. https://bit.ly/3kDoaRd
Copyright (c) 2021 Eulalia Blázquez García, Victoria Marín Juarros
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms:
a. The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License. Non-commercial attribution 4.0 International that allows to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt, remix, transform and build on the material in the following terms:
Recognition - You must give the appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in a way that suggests that the licensor or its use endorses it. Non-commercial - You cannot use the material for commercial purposes. Share under it - If you remix, transform, or create on the material, your contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published work (e.g. deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) whenever the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to distribute their work through the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
d. In any case, the Editorial Team understands that the opinions expressed by the authors are their exclusive responsibility.
