Teachers’ perception of technology integration in learning spaces
Abstract
The definition of the characteristics of a learning space places us before the existence of three dimensions of key analysis for its conceptual design, the environmental dimension, the pedagogical dimension and the digital dimension (Bautista and Borges, 2013). The article shows the results of a research that aims to know the knowledge, preferences, perceptions and needs of teachers regarding the configuration of the classroom as a learning space, specifically in relation to the digital dimension. To do this, a quantitative study was carried out using the survey method of a sample of 847 preschool, primary and secondary education teachers. The results obtained show that teachers identify the digital dimension and consider that this should be one of the key elements to propose new learning spaces in schools.
Downloads
References
Bannister, D. (2017). Pautas para estudiar y adaptar los espacios de aprendizaje en centros educativos. Brussels: European Schoolnet. Retrieved from https://intef.es/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/EspaciosdeAprendizaje_Gu%C3%ADa_ES.pdf
Bautista, G. y Borges, F. (2013). Smart classrooms: Innovation in formal learning spaces to transform learning experiences. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 15(3), 18–21. Retrieved from http://lttf.ieee.org/issues/july2013/Bautista.pdf
Bautista, G. (2010). Analysis of didactic ICT integration in the Swedish educational context from a Learning Design Sequences (LDS) model perspective: case study in schools with advanced integration of technology. En actas del congreso ECER2010.
Bautista, G., Escofet, A., Forés, A., López, M., & Marimon, M. (2013). Superando el concepto de nativo digital. Análisis de las prácticas digitales del estudiantado universitario. Digital Education Review, 24, 1-22.
Barrett, P. y Zhang, Y. (2009). Optimal learning spaces: design implications for primary schools. SCRI Research Report. Retrieved from http://usir.salford.ac.uk/18471/
Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and environment, 59, 678-689.
Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2017). The Holistic Impact of Classroom Spaces on Learning in Specific Subjects. Environment and Behavior, 49(4), 425-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516648735
Bogart, W. Van De, & Wichadee, S. (2016). Students’ Perceived Effectiveness of Educational Technologies and Motivation in Smart Classroom. TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/content-files/document-461604.pdf
Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2014). Making the case for space: The effect of learning spaces on teaching and learning. Curriculum and Teaching, 29(1), 5-19.
Byers, T., Hartnell-Young, E., & Imms, W. (2016). Empirical evaluation of different classroom spaces on students’ perceptions of the use and effectiveness of 1‐to‐1 technology. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.12518
Byers, T., Hartnell-Young, E., & Imms, W. (2018). Empirical evaluation of different classroom spaces on students' perceptions of the use and effectiveness of 1‐to‐1 technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 153-164.
Cantero, J. M. M. (2017). Attraction factors into space as a required element of physical learning environment. A review. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 130-136
Céspedes, R. & Ballesta, J. (2018). Acceso, uso y actitud de la tecnología en las escuelas de Educación Primaria en la Región de Murcia. Aula Abierta, 47(3), 355-364. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.47.3.2018.355-364
Cuban, L. (2004). Whatever happened to the open classroom: Were schools without walls just another fad. Education Next, 2, 68-71.
Cuban, L. (2010). Perinnieal dilemmas policymakers and practitioners face in the adoption and classroom use of ICT: the U.S. experience. Barcelona: Fundación Jaume Bofill i Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
Dumont, H.; Istance, D., Benavides, F. (Eds.) (2010). The nature of learning using research to inspire practice: Using research to inspire practice. Paris: OECD publishing.
European Commission (2013). Survey of Schools: ICT in Education. Benchmarking Access, Use and Attitudes to Technology in Europe’s Schools. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2759/944997.
European Commission (2019). 2nd Survey of Schools: ICT in Education. Objective 1: Benchmark progress in ICT in schools. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2759/23401.
Groff, J. (2013). Technology-rich Innovative Learning Environments. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/Technology-Rich Innovative Learning Environments by Jennifer Groff.pdf
Gros, B. (2010). El ordenador invisible: hacia la apropiación del ordenador en la enseñanza. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Hernandez Sampieri, R. y Pilar, L. (2006). Metodología de la investigación. McGrawHill: México.
Istance, D., Salgado, M. M., & Shadoian-Gersing, V. (2013). Innovative learning environments. Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publising.
Könings, K. D., & McKenney, S. (2017). Participatory design of (built) learning environments. European Journal of Education, 52(3), 247-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12232
Long, P. D., & Ehrmann, S. C. (2005). Future of the learning space: Breaking out of the box. EDUCAUSE review, 40(4), 42-58.
Marcelo, C. (2013). Las tecnologías para la innovación y la práctica docente. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 18(52), 25-47.
Mathews, E. y Lippman, P.C. (2015). Allowing for the Spaces In Between: The Role of Physical Environment in Early Childhood Education. Unpublished.
Muñoz, J.M.; García, R. y López-Chao, V. (2016). Influence of Physical Learning Environment in Student’s Behavior and Social Relations. Anthropologist, 25(3), 249-253.
Oblinger D, Lippincott J. 2006. Learning spaces (c2006. 1 v). Boulder (CO): EDUCAUSE
OCDE (2013). Innovative Learning Environments. Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pingxiao, W. (2016). Research on the english teaching and autonomous learning based on multimedia platform and smart classroom system, 10(9), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsh.2016.10.9.34
Tyack, D. & Tobin, W. (1994). The “Grammar” of schooling: Why Has it Been so Hard to Change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453-480.
Wall, G. (2016). Flexible Learning Spaces: The impact of physical design on student outcomes. New Zealand: Ministry of education. Retrieved from www.educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms:
a. The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License. Non-commercial attribution 4.0 International that allows to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt, remix, transform and build on the material in the following terms:
Recognition - You must give the appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in a way that suggests that the licensor or its use endorses it. Non-commercial - You cannot use the material for commercial purposes. Share under it - If you remix, transform, or create on the material, your contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published work (e.g. deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) whenever the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to distribute their work through the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
d. In any case, the Editorial Team understands that the opinions expressed by the authors are their exclusive responsibility.
