Self-perception of Primary Education teachers in service from the TPACK model

Authors

  • Ana Maria Ortiz Colon Universidad de JAén
  • Miriam Ágreda Montoro
  • Javier Rodríguez Moreno
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.415641
Keywords: TPACK; self-perception; teacher training; Primary education

Abstract

The study aims to analyze the most relevant results of the research carried out with primary education teachers, with reference to the TPACK model. The objective of this research is to know the self-perception of primary school teachers in service, regarding their technological training, taking as a reference the TPACK diagnostic scale. For the collection of information, a Likert type questionnaire already validated was adapted, following the TPACK model. The questionnaire consists of 47 items that collect information on the seven dimensions of the model. The sample consists of 607 teachers. The research is of a non-experimental descriptive nature, and performs a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The most significant results have been the finding of differences regarding the gender of the participants. In general, it is men who have a greater perception of themselves regarding the use and integration of ICTs in their teaching practice, especially in scientific matters. Women seem to be more effective when they select approaches to guide student learning and thinking in terms of reading and writing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ana Maria Ortiz Colon, Universidad de JAén

Universidad de Jaén

Departamento de Pedagogia

Profesora Titular del Area de D.O.E.

References

Akapame, R., Burroughs, E. & Arnold, E. (2019). A Clash Between Knowledge and Practice: A Case Study of TPACK in Three Pre-service Secondary Mathematics Teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(3), 269-304. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/208634/.

Bas, G. & Senturk, C. (2018). An evaluation of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of in-service teachers: A study in Turkish public schools. International Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 46-58. Retrieved from <https://educationaltechnology.net/ijet/index.php/ijet/article/view/58>.

Bilici, S., Yamak, H., Kavak, N., & Guzey, S.S. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy scale (TPACK-SeS) for preservice science teachers: Construction, validation and reliability. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 37-60.

Cabero, J. & Barroso, J. (2016). ICT teacher training: a view of the TPACK model / Formación del profesorado en TIC: una visión del modelo TPACK, Cultura y educación, 28:3, 633-663. DOI: 10.1080/11356405.2016.1203526

Cabero, J. (Dir.) (2014). La formación del profesorado en TIC: Modelo TPACK. Conocimiento Tecnológico Pedagógico y de Contenido. Recuperado de https://www.academia.edu/8021740/La_formaci%C3%B3n_dle_profesorado_en_TIC_Modelo_TPACK_Conocimiento_tecnol%C3%B3gico_pedag%C3%B3gico_y_de_contenido_

Cabero, J. (Dir.) (2010). Usos del e-learning en las universidades andaluzas. Sevilla: Grupo de Investigación Didáctica.

Cabero, J. (2007). Las necesidades de las TICs en el ámbito educativo: riesgos y oportunidades. Tecnología y Comunicación Educativas, 45, 4-19.

Cabero, J. (2004). Formación del profesorado en TIC. El gran caballo de batalla. Comunicación y Pedagogía. Tecnología y Recursos Didácticos, 195, 27-31.

Castillejos, B., Torres, C.A. y Lagunes, A. (2014). El enfoque del Conocimiento Tecnológico Pedagógico del Contenido (TPACK): Revisión del modelo. In I. Esquivel Gámez (Coord.) Los Modelos Tecno-Educativos, revolucionando el aprendizaje del siglo XXI (pp. 237-252). Mexico. Recuperado de https://goo.gl/G8nTdk

Castéra, J., Marre, C. C., Yok, M. C. K., Sherab, K., Impedovo, M. A., Sarapuu, T., & Armand, H. (2020). Self-reported TPACK of teacher educators across six countries in Asia and Europe. Education and Information Technologies. DOI: https://doir.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10106-6

Chen, Y.H., & Jang, S.J. (2019). Exploring the Relationship Between Self-Regulation and TPACK of Taiwanese Secondary In-Service Teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(4), 978–1002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118769442

Gao, P., Choy, D., Wong, A. F. L., & Wu, J. (2009). Developing a better understanding of technology-based pedagogy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 714–730.

García Valcárcel, A. y Martín del Pozo, M. (2016). Análisis de las competencias digitales de los graduados en titulaciones de maestro. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa-RELATEC, 15 (2), 155-168.

Jwaifell, M. (2019). In-Service Science Teachers' Readiness of Integrating Augmented Reality. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 8(2), 43-53.

Kali, Y., Sagy, O., Benichou, M., Atias, O., & Levin‐Peled, R. (2019). Teaching expertise reconsidered: The Technology, Pedagogy, Content and Space (TPeCS) knowledge framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2162-2177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12847

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York: Routledge for the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Pozo Sánchez, S., López Belmonte, J., Fernández Cruz, M. & López Núñez, J.A. (2020). Análisis correlacional de los factores incidentes en el nivel de competencia digital del profesorado. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 23(1), 143-159.

Prats, M.A., Riera, J., Gandol, F. y Carrillo, E. (2012). Autopercepción y demandas del profesorado de infantil y primaria sobre formación en Pizarra Digital Interactiva. PixelBit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 40, p.89-100.

Roig, R., Mengual, S. & Quinto, P. (2015). Primary Teachers' Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge. [Conocimientos tecnológicos, pedagógicos y disciplinares del profesorado de Primaria]. Comunicar, 45, 151-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C45-2015-16

Roussinos, D., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2019). Examining Primary Education Teachers’ Perceptions of TPACK and the related Educational Context Factors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(4), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1666323

Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2017). On the quest for validity: Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance of the technology-dimensions in the Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model. Computers & Education, 112, 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.012

Senol S. (2020). Modelling the relations between Turkish chemistry teachers’sense of efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge in context. Interactive Learning Environments. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1712430

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1-2. Trans. Spanish. In: Shulman, L.S. (2005). Conocimiento y Enseñanza: fundamentos de una nueva reforma. Profesorado. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 9, 2. Retrieved from http://www.ugr.es/local/recfpro/Rev92ART1.pdf

Sosa, M. J., Revuelta, F. I. y López, C. (2013). Procesos de innovación docente y análisis de las dimensiones pedagógicas en la integración tecnológica asociadas al proyecto escuela 2.0 en la comunidad autónoma de Extremadura. En M. Área Moreira. (Ed.), Políticas educativas y buenas prácticas TIC. Actas II simposio internacional SITIC, Tenerife. Recuperado de http://edullab.webs.ull.es/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/ACTAS- SITIC-TENERIFE-2013.pdf

Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1201

Thompson, B. (1994). The concept of Statistical Significance Testing. Practice Assesment, Research & Evaluation, 4(5), 1-3. DOI: https://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=4&n=5

Tsatsou, P. (2017). Literacy and training in digital research: Researchers’ views in five social science and humanities disciplines. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1240–1259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816688274

Voithfer, R., Nelson, M.J., Han G., & Caines, A. (2019). Factors that influence TPACK adoption by teacher educators in the US. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1427-1453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09652-9

Wollscheid, S., Sjaastad, J., & Tømte, C. (2016). The impact of digital devices vs. Pen (cil) and paper on primary school students’ writing skills–A research review. Computers & Education, 95, 19-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.001

Zhang, S., Liu, Q., & Cai, Z. (2019). Exploring primary school teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in online collaborative discourse: An epistemic network analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3437-3455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12751

Published
01-04-2020
How to Cite
Ortiz Colon, A. M., Ágreda Montoro, M., & Rodríguez Moreno, J. (2020). Self-perception of Primary Education teachers in service from the TPACK model. Interuniversity Electronic Journal of Teacher Formation, 23(2), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.415641