Design and validation of a questionnaire to study of the relationship and collaboration museum and school (MUSELA DOC)

Authors

  • Ainoa Escribano Miralles UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA
  • Francisca José Serrano Pastor
  • Pedro Miralles Martínez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.22.1.356991

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to design and validate the Museum and School information collection tool, relationship and use for teaching history to teachers (MUSELA DOC). The analysis procedure consists of the study of the psychometric characteristics of the instrument, its validity of content, reliability and construct validity. The quantitative design is analytical descriptive. The strategies used were a pilot study and an external analysis in which eighteen experts participated. The participants had to assess the instrument using a validation scale, designed ad hoc and structured in three different parts (presentation of the purpose of the research and the objectives of the questionnaire, instructions for completion, items that should be analyzed according to the adequacy, relevance, relevance and orthographic correction through a scale of numerical estimation with five values).The scale consisted of five dimensions that support the conceptual basis of the instrument. The analysis of the reliability of the questionnaire, using Cronbach's alpha method, has shown a coefficient of .57 for the 38 items analyzed on the global scale, which indicates a moderate internal consistency. Two questions have had to be excluded from the analytical process because they do not have enough variability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Se incluye además del artículo dos anexos que pueden complementar la lectura del trabajo

Published
25-01-2019
How to Cite
Escribano Miralles, A., Serrano Pastor, F. J., & Miralles Martínez, P. (2019). Design and validation of a questionnaire to study of the relationship and collaboration museum and school (MUSELA DOC). Interuniversity Electronic Journal of Teacher Formation, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.22.1.356991
Issue
Section
Originales