Academic Metrics and Predictive Models for First-Attempt Residency Placement Success in a U.S. Accredited Medical School.
Resumo
Objective: This study examined the contribution of academic performance indicators across the medical education continuum to predicting first-attempt residency placement success. Methods: A predictive, non-experimental, quantitative design with logistic regression analysis was used to analyze academic records of medical students from a U.S.-accredited medical school in Puerto Rico. Predictor variables included Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores, grade point average (GPA), class rank, Comprehensive Basic Science Examination (CBSE), USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK), and number of Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) attempts. Logistic regression models were applied to evaluate predictive validity. Results: USMLE Step 2 CK emerged as the strongest predictor of first-attempt residency placement. A Step 2 CK score of approximately 240 corresponded to a predicted probability of ≥90% for successful first-attempt matching. Conclusions: Academic metrics, particularly Step 2 CK, remain critical predictors of residency placement success. These findings support integrating predictive dashboards and targeted curricular interventions to enhance student readiness and institutional outcomes.
Downloads
-
Resumo6
-
pdf 3
-
xml (Español (España))0
Referências
1. American Association of Medical Colleges. MCAT ® validity data report 2024. https://www.aamc.org/media/78266/download
2. American Association of Medical Colleges. Data and reports on medical student performance and residency outcomes. AAMC 2024. https://www.aamc.org/services/mcat-admissions-officers/national-data-medical-student-success-outcomes
3. Bhattacharya, S. Competency-based medical education: An overview. Ann Med Sci Res. 2023, 2(3), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.4103/amsr.amsr_27_23
4. Boulet, J. Supply, distribution, and characteristics of international medical graduates in family medicine in the United States: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12875-019-0933-8
5. Frank, JR, Snell, Englander, R. Competency-based medical education: Theory to practice. Med Teach., 2020 42(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2010.501190
6. Girard, AO, Qiu, C, Lake, IV, Chen, J, Lopez, CD, Yang, R. US medical student perspectives on the impact of a pass/fail USMLE Step 1. J. Surg Educ. 2022, 79(2), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.09.010
7. Gruppuso PA, Adashi EY. Residency Placement Fever: Is It Time for a Reevaluation? Acad Med. 2017, 92(7), 923-926. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001468
8. Lombardi, CV, Chidiac, NT, Record, BC, Laukka, JJ. USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK as indicators of resident performance. BMC Med Educ, 2023, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04530-8
9. Longenecker, R. Residency match rates as institutional performance indicators. J Grad Med Educ, 2023 15(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2023.106345
10. National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2023 Main Residency Match. 2023. https://www.nrmp.org/match-data/2025/05/results-and-data-2025-main-residency-match/
11. Rothka, AJ, Choi, KY, Nguyen, M. Impact of USMLE pass/fail Step 1 scoring on current medical students. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024, 11: 23821205241281650. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241281650
12. Ten Cate, O. Competency-based postgraduate medical education: Past, present and future. GMS J Med Educ. 2017, 34(5). https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001146
13. Wu, W, Garcia, K, Chandrahas, S, Siddiqui, A, Baronia, R, Ibrahim, Y. Predictors of Performance on USMLE Step 1. Southwest Respir Crit Care Chron. 2021, 9(39), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.12746/swrccc.v9i39.813
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Serviço de Publicações da Universidade de Múrcia

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Os trabalhos publicados nesta revista estão sujeitos aos seguintes termos:
1. O Serviço de Publicações da Universidade de Murcia (o editor) preserva os direitos económicos (direitos de autor) das obras publicadas e favorece e permite a sua reutilização ao abrigo da licença de utilização indicada no ponto 2.
2. Os trabalhos são publicados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-NãoDerivada 4.0.
3. Condições de autoarquivamento. Os autores estão autorizados e incentivados a divulgar eletronicamente as versões pré-impressas (versão antes de ser avaliada e enviada à revista) e / ou pós-impressas (versão avaliada e aceita para publicação) de seus trabalhos antes da publicação, desde que favorece sua circulação e difusão mais precoce e com ela possível aumento de sua citação e alcance junto à comunidade acadêmica.
![]()





This is a Diamond Journal 






