Drawing as a learning tool for anatomy: design and implementation of a method.

Autores

  • Elena Martínez Carracelas Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8005-3390
  • Miguel Ángel Fernández-Villacañas Marín Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6730-4047
  • Matilde Moreno Cascales
  • Diego Flores Funes General and Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Comarcal del Noroeste, Servicio Murciano de Salud, Caravaca de la Cruz, Murcia, Spain
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.639031
Palavras-chave: Medical Education, Anatomy, Drawing, Learning, Skull

Resumo

Anatomy is fundamental in Medical Education. This study evaluates a method of learning skull anatomy and improving three-dimensional comprehension through systematic drawings. A quasi-experimental study was carried out with 67 volunteer first-year medical students to evaluate the influence of using a drawing method during classes to improve the level of anatomical knowledge and three-dimensional understanding. Students attended a four-sessions drawing workshop to work on the four basic anatomical views of the skull. In each session they made one free drawing and another one following the method, both being evaluated checking the presence of 25 predefined anatomical items. Their progress was assessed by comparing the scores obtained at the beginning and at the end of the workshop with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Likewise, the mean scores of the subject General Anatomy of the Locomotor System of the participants in the workshop and the rest of the students who did not participate were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Finally, students evaluated the activity through a satisfaction survey. An increase in drawing scores was observed. The first drawing of the first session scored with a median of 8/25 ±4.0, being 11/25 ± 5.0 (p=0.00) the first drawing score of the fourth session. The second drawing scores in the objective correction were 23/25 ±4 and 25/25 ±1 in the first and fourth sessions, respectively (p=0.00). Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups. The workshop participating students obtained better grades in all final exams (theoretical and practical exams). The experience was rated very positively. This study concludes that the learning method had a positive influence on the learning of Anatomy and that attending the workshop improved the level of knowledge, the ability to discriminate details and skull the three-dimensional understanding.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007, 89(2), 104–7. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588407X168244200.

Papa V, Vaccarezza M. Teaching anatomy in the XXI century: New aspects and pitfalls. Scientific World Journal. 2013, 310-348. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/310348.

Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010, 3(2), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.139.

Netterstrøm I, Kayser L. Learning to be a doctor while learning anatomy! Anat Sci Educ. 2008, 1(4), 154-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.31

Warner JH, Rizzolo LJ. Anatomical instruction and training for professionalism from the 19th to the 21st centuries. Clin Anat. 2006, 19(5), 403-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20290

Reidenberg JS, Laitman JT. The new face of gross anatomy. Anat Rec. 2002; 269(2): 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.10076

Bergman EM, Van Der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA. Why don’t they know enough about anatomy? A narrative review. Medical Teacher 2011; 33(5): 403–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.536276.

Aragão JA, Fonseca-Barreto AT, Brito CJ, Guerra DR, Nunes-Mota JC, Reis FP. The availability of teaching–pedagogical resources used for promotion of learning in teaching human anatomy. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013; (4): 157–63 https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S47145.

Joewono M, Karmaya INM, Wirata G, Yuliana, Widianti IGA et al. Drawing method can improve musculoskeletal anatomy comprehension in medical faculty student. Anat Cell Biol. 2018; 51(1): 14-18 https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2018.51.1.14.

Barabas A, Brit FRCS, Med Y. Blackboard Drawing in Medical Teaching. Br Med J. 1965; (1): 782-784. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5437.782.

Clavert P, Bouchaïb J, Duparc F, Kahn JL. A plea for the use of drawing in human anatomy teaching. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012; 34(8): 787–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-012-0967-2.

Mathon B, Chougar L, Carpentier A, Amelot A. Teaching brain imaging through a drawing method may improve learning in medical students. Eur Radiol. 2020; 17; 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07484-3. 13. Nayak SB, Kodimajalu S. Progressive drawing: A novel “lid-opener” and “monotony-breaker.” Anat Sci Educ . 2010; 3(6): 326–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.172.

Alsaid B, Bertrand M. Students’ memorization of anatomy, influence of drawing. Morphologie. 2016; 100(328): 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2015.11.001.

Publicado
28-01-2025
Como Citar
Martínez Carracelas, E., Fernández-Villacañas Marín, M. Ángel, Moreno Cascales, M., & Flores Funes, D. (2025). Drawing as a learning tool for anatomy: design and implementation of a method . Revista Espanhola de Educação Médica, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.639031

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2,4

Reviewer profiles  Indisp.

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
Indisp.
32%
Competing interests 
Indisp.
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
85%
33%
Days to publication 
64
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
Universidad de Murcia
Publisher 
Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (Editum)