Estudio piloto para evaluar la usabilidad de una aplicación de realidad virtual inmersiva para la formación médica en apendicitis aguda.

Autores/as

  • Iñigo Alzaga https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6342-239X https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6342-239X
  • Asier Legarreta Gaminde Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country EHU-UPV, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.
  • Verónica Tíscar González Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Basurto University Hospital, Research & Innovation Service, Avenida Montevideo 18, 48013 Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7071-0196
  • Itsaso Villanueva Ibero Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country EHU-UPV, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4386-2185
  • Edorta Ander Pérez García Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Plaza Cruces 12, 48903 Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-5163
  • Ane Arcaraz Arnaiz aculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country EHU-UPV, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2944-0621
  • Igor Alberdi San Román aculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country EHU-UPV, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6597-885X
  • Alberto Loizate Totaricaguena Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Plaza Cruces 12, 48903 Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0921-5994
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.688741
Palabras clave: realidad virtual, ; Educación médica, tecnologías inmersivas, realidad virtual inmersiva, hospitales

Resumen

Introducción: La realidad virtual (RV) está transformando la educación médica mediante simulaciones didácticas e interactivas de casos clínicos. La realidad virtual inmersiva (RVI) permite que el usuario experimente una inmersión total haciéndole creer que se encuentra dentro de ese entorno ficticio. Objetivo: analizar la usabilidad de una aplicación de RVI destinada a la formación de estudiantes de medicina en un caso de apendicitis aguda. Metodología. Estudio piloto con 20 estudiantes de sexto año medicina. Se ha diseñado un cuestionario para evaluar la usabilidad, aceptabilidad y satisfacción del personal usuario con la tecnología. Se analizaron cada una de las variables de forma independiente. Resultados: Todo el personal participante completó la simulación sin problemas técnicos. Una única persona (5%) manifestó sentir mareos durante la simulación. Los/as participantes reportaron altos niveles de adaptación al manejo de la tecnología (95%) y comprensión de los paneles e instrucciones de la simulación (100%). Se mostró una gran aceptación respecto al uso de esta tecnología para la adquisición de nuevo conocimientos (90%) y el tiempo estimado para asentar conocimientos clínicos con esta intervención (75%). Conclusión: A pesar de que la RVI se encuentre en sus fases iniciales de desarrollo, está generando nuevas oportunidades educativas en la formación médica.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Metrics
Vistas/Descargas
  • Resumen
    79
  • pdf
    38

Citas

1. Sakai D, Joyce K, Sugimoto M, Horikita N, Hiyama A, Sato M, et al. Augmented, virtual and mixed reality in spinal surgery: A real-world experience. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499020952698

2. Neher AN, Bühlmann F, Müller M, Berendonk C, Sauter TC, Birrenbach T. Virtual reality for assessment in undergraduate nursing and medical education – a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2025, 25(1).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06867-8

3. Schöbel T, Schuschke L, Youssef Y, Rotzoll D, Theopold J, Osterhoff G. Immersive virtual reality in orthopedic surgery as elective subject for medical students : First experiences in curricular teaching. Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany). 2024, 53(5). 369–78. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38575780/

4. Martinez FT, Soto JP, Valenzuela D, González N, Corsi J, Sepúlveda P. Virtual Clinical Simulation for Training Amongst Undergraduate Medical Students: A Pilot Randomised Trial (VIRTUE-Pilot). Cureus. 2023, 5(10). e47527. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10663973/

5. Wynn R, Larsen YS, Johannessen K, Solbakken AM. A Virtual Reality Pilot for Second-Year Medical Students’ Clinical Training: Students’ Experiences. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025, 323. 516–7. https://ebooks.iospress.nl/doi/10.3233/SHTI250144

6. Pears M, Rochester M, Wadhwa K, Payne SR, Konstantinidis S, Hanchanale V, et al. A Pilot Study Evaluating a Virtual Reality-Based Nontechnical Skills Training Application for Urology Trainees: Usability, Acceptability, and Impact. J Surg Educ. 2023, 80(12). 1836–42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37723012/

7. Kadri M, Boubakri FE, Hwang GJ, Zahra Kaghat F, Azough A, Alaoui Zidani K. C-IVAL: A Longitudinal Study of Knowledge Retention and Technology Acceptance in Collaborative Virtual Reality-Based Medical Education. IEEE Access. 2025, 13. 16055–71. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10817604

8. Rizzetto F, Bernareggi A, Rantas S, Vanzulli A, Vertemati M. Immersive Virtual Reality in surgery and medical education: Diving into the future. Vol. 220, American Journal of Surgery. 2020, 856–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.04.033

9. Knudsen MH, Breindahl N, Dalsgaard TS, Isbye D, Mølbak AG, Tiwald G, et al. Using Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays to Assess Skills in Emergency Medicine: Validity Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023, 25. e45210.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10282911/

10. Mergen M, Graf N, Meyerheim M. Reviewing the current state of virtual reality integration in medical education - a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. 2024, 24(1). 788. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-024-05777-5

11. Plataforma de desarrollo en tiempo real Unity | Motor 3D, 2D, VR y AR. https://unity.com/es. Accessed: 2025 Dec 3.

12. The enterprise XR platform – VIROO. https://virtualwareco.com/viroo. Accessed: 2025 Dec 3.

13. Meta Quest 3S: Next-gen virtual reality headset | Meta Store. https://www.meta.com/es/en/quest/quest-3s/?srsltid=AfmBOorgzpVUjvg_PVTEQa7AIvxsn-MjaolWRhMmwdAnuEsgH6OAqhHn. Accessed: 2025 Dec 3

14. Kamel Boulos, Susan Toth-Cohen, Simon Bignell et al. Development and Evaluation of Health and Wellness Exhibits. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research 2009, 2, 2. https://jvwr-ojs-utexas.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/708/502

15. Barteit S, Lanfermann L, Bärnighausen T, Neuhann F, Beiersmann C. Augmented, Mixed, and Virtual Reality-Based Head-Mounted Devices for Medical Education: Systematic Review. JMIR Serious Games. 2021, 9(3), e29080. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8299342/

16. Xin B, Chen G, Wang Y, Bai G, Gao X, Chu J, et al. The Efficacy of Immersive Virtual Reality Surgical Simulator Training for Pedicle Screw Placement: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial. World Neurosurg. 2018, 124, 324–30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30597280/

17. Liaw SY, Tan JZ, Lim S, Zhou W, Yap J, Ratan R, et al. Artificial intelligence in virtual reality simulation for interprofessional communication training: Mixed method study. Nurse Educ Today. 2023, 122. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36669304/

18. Braun P, Grafelmann M, Gill F, Stolz H, Hinckeldeyn J, Lange AK. Virtual reality for immersive multi-user firefighter-training scenarios. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware. 2022, 4(5). 406–17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209657962200081X

19. Sapkaroski D, Mundy M, Dimmock MR. Immersive virtual reality simulated learning environment versus role-play for empathic clinical communication training. J Med Radiat Sci. 2022, 69(1). 56–65. /doi/pdf/10.1002/jmrs.555

20. Riddle EW, Kewalramani D, Narayan M, Jones DB. Surgical Simulation: Virtual Reality to Artificial Intelligence. Curr Probl Surg. 2024, 61(11). 101625. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39477664/

21. Han SG, Kim YD, Kong TY, Cho J. Virtual reality-based neurological examination teaching tool(VRNET) versus standardized patient in teaching neurological examinations for the medical students: a randomized, single-blind study. BMC Med Educ. 2021, 21(1). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34526004/

22. Lampropoulos G, del Bosque A, Fernández-Arias P, Vergara D. Virtual Reality in Medical Education, Healthcare Education, and Nursing Education: An Overview. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2025, 9(7). 75. https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/9/7/75/htm

23. Andersen AG, Rahmoui L, Dalsgaard TS, Svendsen MBS, Clementsen PF, Konge L, et al. Preparing for Reality: A Randomized Trial on Immersive Virtual Reality for Bronchoscopy Training. Respiration. 2023, 102(4). 316–23. www.karger.com/res

24. Lo YT, Yang CC, Yeh TF, Tu HY, Chang YC. Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality training in nasogastric tube feeding education: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Educ Today. 2022, 119. 105601. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36244254/

25. Klus C, Krumm K, Jacobi S, Willemer MC, Daub C, Stoevesandt D, et al. External post-mortem examination in virtual reality-scalability of a monocentric application. Int J Legal Med. 2024, 138(5). 1939–46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38592482/

26. Li Pira G, Aquilini B, Davoli A, Silvana G, Ruini C. The Use of Virtual Reality Interventions to Promote Positive Mental Health: Systematic Literature Review. JMIR Ment Health. 2023 ,10. 44998. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10360019/

27. Lie SS, Helle N, Sletteland NV, Vikman MD, Bonsaksen T. Implementation of Virtual Reality in Health Professions Education: Scoping Review. JMIR Med Educ. 2023, 9. 41589. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9906320/

Publicado
16-12-2025
Cómo citar
Alzaga, I., Legarreta Gaminde, A., Tíscar González, V., Villanueva Ibero, I., Pérez García, E. A., Arcaraz Arnaiz, A., … Loizate Totaricaguena, A. (2025). Estudio piloto para evaluar la usabilidad de una aplicación de realidad virtual inmersiva para la formación médica en apendicitis aguda. Revista Española De Educación Médica, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.688741