Impact of Simulation applied to Health Social.
Abstract
Healthcare Social Work (HSW) faces a sustained increase in social complexity within hospital settings, a phenomenon widely recognized by professionals in the field. This increase demands scientific evidence of the impact of this social complexity on the patient's overall prognosis and, at the same time, requires the creation of new training strategies capable of responding to highly sensitive situations and the significant emotional burden these cases entail. In this context, clinical simulation emerges as a particularly relevant pedagogical methodology. Its ability to recreate realistic scenarios allows for the training of communicative, reflective, and decision-making skills in a safe environment, fostering deep experiential learning. The scenario in clinical simulation is configured as a key pedagogical methodology that promotes experiential learning, making it an ideal tool for addressing complex cases such as gender-based violence, child abuse, and conflicts in hospital discharge planning. The objective of this article is to generate scientific evidence of how clinical simulation can improve HSH intervention in cases of social complexity, contributing to professional excellence in the HSH discipline. The results show very high levels of satisfaction and professional confidence, supporting the potential of simulation to strengthen reflection, decision-making, and cohesion within the interdisciplinary team. Furthermore, the methodology contributes to consolidating the professional identity of social workers and improving the quality of intervention in contexts marked by vulnerability and uncertainty. Overall, the findings demonstrate that clinical simulation is not only an effective training tool but also a transformative space that fosters the comprehensive development of professionals and improves their response to situations of high social complexity. Its incorporation into social worker training programs has represented a significant step toward a more competent, reflective, and person-centered practice.
Downloads
-
Abstract35
-
pdf (Español (España))6
-
pdf6
-
xml (Español (España))0
References
1. Cabot RC. Social Work in Hospitals. Russell Sage Foundation; 1909. https://www.russellsage.org/sites/default/files/Cannon_Soc%20Work%20Hospitals_0.pdf
2. Cannon IM. Social Work in Hospitals: A Contribution to Progressive Medicine. Russell Sage Foundation; 1923. https://www.russellsage.org/sites/default/files/Cannon_Soc%20Work%20Hospitals_0.pdf
3. Solar O, Irwin A. A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health. World Health Organization; 2010.
4. Healy K. Social Work Theories in Context: Creating Frameworks for Practice. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. https://books.google.es/books/about/Social_Work_Theories_in_Context.html?id=qtpzEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
5. Dominelli L. Social Work in a Globalizing World. Polity Press; 2010. https://books.google.es/books/about/Social_Work_in_a_Globalizing_World.html?id=zQXd7FtGxVQC&redir_esc=y
6. Payne M. Modern Social Work Theory. 5th ed. Oxford University Press; 2021. https://books.google.com.bz/books?id=ErESDQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&rview=1#v=onepage&q&f=false
7. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health at a Glance: Europe 2023. OECD Publishing. https://health.ec.europa.eu/state-health-eu/health-glance-europe_en
8. Ituarte Tellaeche, Amaya. Procedimiento y proceso en trabajo social clínico. Siglo XXI de España Editores; 1992. ISBN 84-323-0759-9. https://www.casadellibro.com/libro-procedimiento-y-proceso-en-trabajo-social-clinico/9788432307607/20274?srsltid=AfmBOopxTzJPfSEr7dRDXg0XjCLDYn6LN3s4P_cx7MECuoGjmThHoUOo
9. Maslach C, Leiter MP. Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2016, 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311
10. Lateef F. Simulation-based learning: just like the real thing. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010, 3(4), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.70743
11. Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education. Med Teach. 2013, 35(10), e1511–e1530. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632
12. Jeffries PR, Rizzolo MA. Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale. New York: National League for Nursing; 2006. https://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/uploadedfiles/default-document-library/instrument-2-satisfaction-and-self-confidence-in-learning.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
13. Farrés-Tarafa M, Bande D, Roldán-Merino J, Hurtado-Pardos B, Biurrun-Garrido A, Molina-Raya L, et al. Estudio de fiabilidad y validez de la adaptación española de la «Escala de Satisfacción del Estudiante y Confianza en el Aprendizaje» (SCLS). PLoS ONE. 2021, 16(7), e0255188. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255188
Copyright (c) 2026 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the economic rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows them to be reused under the use license indicated in point 2.
2. The works are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically the pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) of their works before publication , since it favors its circulation and earlier diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.





This is a Diamond Journal 





