Competency profile in the pre-analytical phase in Medical Technology students: curricular implications.

Authors

  • Anthony Rosber Aguilar Galvez Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7462-8318
  • María Elena Muñoz Zambrano Facultad de Medicina, Directora, Dpto. Académico de Tecnología Médica. Facultad de Medicina. Subdirectora de seguimiento y Evaluación de la Dirección de Salud Pública. Instituto Nacional de Salud. Lima, Perú. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2560-3903
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.702721
Keywords: Desarrollo de competencias, Formación universitaria, Fase Preanalítica Perú

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the profile of preanalytical competency acquisition among advanced Medical Technology students at the National University of San Marcos, Peru, identifying areas of opportunity for curricular strengthening. Methods: Analytical cross-sectional study with 112 fourth and fifth year students. A validated 15-item questionnaire on preanalytical management adapted from Dukic et al. was applied. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, association tests (Chi-square) and logistic regression. Results: The sample showed a balanced distribution by sex (50.9% male, 49.1% female). A solid theoretical foundation was identified (98.2% in tube order) along with specific areas to deepen practice (homogenization: 30.4%; transport for coagulation: 27.7%; lipemic samples management: 39.3%). Clinical experience showed positive impact on directly practiced skills (p<0.05). Age ≥25 years was associated with greater knowledge integration (OR=2.85; p=0.021). Conclusion: The findings provide an empirical basis for optimizing training through greater theory-practice integration, representing a strategic opportunity to strengthen the technical competencies that directly impact diagnostic quality in Peru.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    0
  • pdf (Español (España))
    0
  • pdf
    0
  • Anexo 1 (Español (España))
    0

References

1. Altamirano T, Macías C, et al. Educación Basada en Competencias: Enfoque y Desafíos. Polo del Conocimiento. 2025, 10, 4. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v10i4.9396.

2. Cornes M. The preanalytical phase – Past, present and future. Ann Clin Biochem. 2020, 57, 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563219867989.

3. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010, 376, 9756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.

4. Ministerio de Salud del Perú. Norma Técnica de Salud para la Gestión de Procesos del Laboratorio Clínico N° 021-MINSA-DGSO-V.03. Lima: Ministerio de Salud del Perú. 2022. https://cdn.gacetajuridica.com.pe/laley/NORMA%20T%C3%89CNICA%20DE%20SALUD%20N%C2%BA021-MINSA-DGSP-V.03_LALEY.pdf.

5. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Indicadores de calidad para laboratorios clínicos: manual de implementación. Washington, D.C. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. 2021. https://iris.paho.org/items/cf41af22-aa33-40b1-bd4c-1d11595c844c.

6. Dukic L, Jokic A, Kules J, Pasalic D. The knowledge and understanding of preanalytical phase among biomedicine students. Biochem Med. 2016, 26, 1. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2016.009.

7. Sepúlveda F, Azocar I, González ML, et al. The Contribution of Education to the Correction of Preanalytical Errors in Laboratory Testing: A Systematic Review. Salud Ciencia y Tecnología. 2025, 5, 1781. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251781.

8. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Plan Estratégico Institucional 2026-2030. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. 2026. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/unmsm/informes-publicaciones/1943021-plan-estrategico-institucional-pei.

9. Lima-Oliveira G, Volanski W, Lippi G, et al. Pre-analytical phase management: a review of the procedures from patient preparation to laboratory analysis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017, 77, 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2017.1295317.

10. Simundic AM, Cornes M, Grankvist K, Lippi G, Nybo M, Kovalevskaya S, et al. Survey of national guidelines, education and training on phlebotomy in 28 European countries. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013, 51, 8. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2013-0283.

11. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. La salud universal en el siglo XXI: 40 años de Alma-Ata. Informe de la Comisión de Alto Nivel. Washington, D.C.: Organización Panamericana de la Salud. 2019. https://iris.paho.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/2cde7c43-fdca-4a4b-a5b7-375d562de22d/content.

12. Kulkarni KK, Ramalingam IT, Kalaimani V, Alur SS, Bylappa L, Rao M. Questionnaire-based Study to Assess Knowledge of Preanalytical Phase of Laboratory Testing Among Trainee Doctors in a Tertiary Care Hospital Medical College. J Lab Physicians. 2020, 12, 3. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1720945.

13. Hawkins R. Managing the pre- and post-analytical phases of the total testing process. Ann Lab Med. 2012, 32, 1. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2012.32.1.5.

14. Ministerio de Salud del Perú. Anuario de Estadísticas en Salud 2022. Lima: Ministerio de Salud del Perú. 2023. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/susalud/informes-publicaciones/4443829-anuario-estadistico-2022.

15. García I, Bauça JM, Gómez C, et al. Preanalytical issues related to routine and diagnostic glucose tests: Results from a survey in Spain. Biochem Med. 2020, 30, 1. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2020.010704.

16. Lippi G, Cadamuro J, von Meyer A, et al. Practical recommendations for managing hemolyzed samples in clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018, 56, 5. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-1104.

17. Plebani M. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Ann Clin Biochem. 2010, 47 2. https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2009.009222.

Published
13-03-2026
How to Cite
Aguilar Galvez, A. R., & Muñoz Zambrano, M. E. (2026). Competency profile in the pre-analytical phase in Medical Technology students: curricular implications. Spanish Journal of Medical Education, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.702721