Applied Training in Conducting Scientometric Professional Studies and Mapping and Analyzing Medical Scientific Networks.
Abstract
The document is a structured, applied training guide designed to bridge the educational gap in conducting professional scientometric studies, with a specific focus on the mapping and analysis of medical scientific networks. Scientometrics is presented as a key approach for systematically assessing knowledge structure, trends, and collaboration, which is indispensable in the rapidly evolving fields of medicine. The guide proposes a practical eight-step framework for the researcher, beginning with a clear definition of a research objective and thematic scope. Crucial steps include selecting authoritative data sources such as Web of Science or Scopus and formulating a precise search strategy using Boolean operators. Following data collection and refinement, the process focuses on network visualization and analysis. For analysis, it is recommended to export complete records to specialized tools such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Gephi. These software programs are used to generate maps of co-authorship, co-citation, and co-word networks, which reveal the social, intellectual, and conceptual structure of a field. The document emphasizes that the interpretation is vital. This phase transforms visualizations and metrics into meaningful insights, which connect with research objectives and allow for the detection of emerging trends or knowledge gaps. Furthermore, the guide introduces advanced bias and integrity detection, using AI to identify anomalies such as citation circles or redundant patterns. Finally, the author underscores the need for clear, transparent, and reproducible reporting, ensuring that the findings serve as a strategic and reliable tool for decision-making and scientific policy.
Downloads
Metrics
-
Abstract45
-
pdf (Español (España))64
-
pdf64
References
• van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
• van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding Y, Rousseau R, Wolfram D, editors. Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice. Springer; 2014. p. 285-320.
• Waltman L, Van Eck NJ. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics. 2010, 4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
• Perianes Rodriguez A, Waltman L, Van Eck NJ. Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics. 2016, 10(4), 1178-1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
• Oyewola, D.O., Dada, E.G. Exploring machine learning: a scientometrics approach using bibliometrix and VOSviewer. SN Appl. Sci. 2022, 4, 143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-022-05027-7
• Chen C, Song M. Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews. PLoS ONE 2019, 14(10), e0223994. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223994
• Baghini MS, Mohammadi M, Norouzkhani N. Usability Testing: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on WoS Data. Journal of Scientometric Research 2024, 13(1), 09-24. DOI:10.5530/jscires.13.1.2
• Dhiman P, Kaura A, Iwendi C, Mohan SK. A Scientometric Analysis of Deep Learning Approaches for Detecting Fake News. Electronics. 2023, 12(4), 948. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12040948
• Zhang Y, Xie X, Xu Q. ChatGPT in Medical Education: Bibliometric and Visual Analysis. JMIR Med Educ. 2025, 11:e72356. https://doi.org/10.2196/72356
Copyright (c) 2025 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the economic rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows them to be reused under the use license indicated in point 2.
2. The works are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically the pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) of their works before publication , since it favors its circulation and earlier diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.












