Evaluation of the quality of abdominal wall closure in murine models carried in undergraduate medical students
Abstract
Introduction: It should be analyzed regularly: what, how and who should teach surgery in undergraduate students; a factor that forces us to improve surgical teaching is the recognition that the patient can have adverse effects. Objective: evaluate the quality of abdominal wall closure in murine models performed by undergraduate students. Materials and Methods: Analytical, prospective, and cross-sectional observational study. A universe was 55 students, of which only 35 selected alumnus were included, who were evaluated on Winstar rat-type mouse models, taking as variables the closure of the abdominal wall and the grades according to the Anaya and Serrano questionnaire. Results: 35 skin closures with average lengths of length 5.4 cm and width 0.53 cm were evaluated, 23 (65.7 %) and poor quality 12 (34.3 %) were rated as quality. A proportion of quality closures is observed in approved undergraduate students (f=18, 78.3%) and non-approved (f=5, 21.7%). A proportion of non-quality closures in approved undergraduate students (f=8, 66.7%) and non-approved (f=4, 33.3%). Discussion: Unsuccessful abdominal wall closures in mouse models are not related to failing grades in undergraduate students in our study, however, the objective for which we wanted to evaluate this skill quantitatively was met.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Hernandez-Centeno R, Rodríguez-Varela M, Rodriguez-Paz C. Nuevos caminos en la educación quirúrgica. In: Tratado de Cirugía General. 2017. p. 117.
Torres RA, Orban RD, Serra EE, Marecos MC, Vargas L, Deffis LI, et al. Enseñanza de técnicas quirúrgicas básicas en simuladores biológicos: Experiencia pedagógica en el pregrado. Educ Médica. 2003;6(4):149–52.
Padilla L, Argüero R, Di Silvio M, López-Gutiérrez J, Landero T, García J, et al. Curso de microcirugía vascular: 40 años en el Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre del Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado y 33 años en la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Cir Cir. 2019;86(2):196–203.
Abreu Hernández LF, Cid Garcia ÁN, Herrera correa G, Lara Vélez JVM, Laviada Delgadillo R, Rodriguez Arroyo C, et al. Perfil por Competencias del Médico General Mexicano. Director. 2008;1–44.
Jurado JT. La enseñanza de la cirugía en el pregrado. Cir Gen. 2011;33(S1):76–7.
Pedroso AR, de Melo RM, de Oliveira EC. Relaxation incisions and tensile strength in the abdominal wall of pigs. Acta Cir Bras. 2019;34(6).
Dávila Serapio F, Rivera Cruz JM, Sánchez González DJ. Aprendizaje de habilidades básicas de cirugía laparoscópica en estudiantes de pregrado de la Escuela Médico Militar. Rev Mex Cirugía Endoscópica. 2008;9(1):27–34.
Serrano-Martínez P, Nava-García JA, Rodríguez-García A, Páez-Garza JH. Evaluación del desarrollo de habilidades y destrezas quirúrgicas en cirugía de catarata por residentes e instructores, empleando el Simulador de Cirugía EyeSi®. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2010;84(1):19–24.
Anaya-Prado R, Ortega-León LH, Ramirez-Solis ME, Vázquez-García JA, Medina-Portillo JB, Ayala-López EA. Evaluación de competencias quirúrgicas. Estudio piloto mexicano. Cir Cir. 2012;80(3):261–9.
Gámez-huerta VH, Martínez-hernández CD, Rodríguez-paz CA. Quirúrgico De Enseñanza En Extracción De Lipomas. 2018;40(2):70–7.
Bustamante Z M. Desafíos en la formación del cirujano Challenges in the training of the surgeon. Rev Chil Cirugía. 2000;67(4):348–9.
Saldarriaga-zambrano MPJ, Bravo-cedeño MGR, Loor- MMR. LaTeoriaConstructivistaDeJeanPiagetYSuSignificacio-5802932. 2016;2:127–37.
Tovar J, García G. Investigación en la práctica docente universitaria. Educ Pesqui. 2012;881–95.
Zerhouni YA, Abu-Bonsrah N, Mehes M, Goldstein S, Buyske J, Abdullah F. General surgery education: a systematic review of training worldwide. Lancet. 2015;385:S39.
Darzi A, Mackay S. Skills assessment of surgeons. Surgery. 2002;131(2):121–4.
García-Partida JA, Berrocoso E, Micó JA. Experimental models for pain evaluation in osteoarthritis. Rev la Soc Esp del Dolor. 2021;28:18–30.
Sáenz Medina J, Asuero de Lis MS, Correa Gorospe C, Cuevas B, Gómez Dos Santos V, Linares Quevedo AI, et al. Modelos experimentales para la investigación y el entrenamiento en trasplante renal. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2008;32(1).
Rodriguez-Paz C, Carreón-Bringas R, Ortega-Salgado J. Cajón de cirugía, modelo didáctico en las técnicas de nudos y afrontamiento. Rev Medica Hosp Gen México. 1993;56(1).
Asociación Médica Mundial. Declaración de la Asociación Médica Mundial sobre el uso de animales en la investigación biomédica.
Ochoa L. Norma Oficial Mexicana, Especificaciones técnicas para la producción, cuidado y uso de los animales de laboratorio. Nom-062-Zoo. 1999;1–58.
Unión C de diputados del HC de la. Reglamento de la Ley General de Salud en Materia de Investigaciones para la Salud. Ley Gen Salud. 1987;DOF 02-04-:1–31.
Copyright (c) 2022 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the economic rights (copyright) of the published works and favors and allows them to be reused under the use license indicated in point 2.
2. The works are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically the pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) of their works before publication , since it favors its circulation and earlier diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
