Exactly Why Are Slurs Wrong?
Resumo
This article seeks to provide a comprehensive and fundamental account of why racial epithets and similar slurs are immoral, whenever they are. It considers three major theories, roughly according to which they are immoral because they are harmful (welfarism), because they undermine autonomy (Kantianism), or because they are unfriendly (an under-considered, relational approach informed by ideas from the Global South). This article presents new objections to the former two theories, and concludes in favour of the latter rationale. Deeming slurs to be wrong insofar as they are unfriendly is shown to capture the advantages of the other theories, while avoiding their disadvantages.
Downloads
Referências
Anderson, L. & Lepore, E. (2013a), ‘Slurring words’, Noûs, 47(1), 25–48.
Anderson, L. & Lepore, E. (2013b), ‘What did you call me? Slurs as prohibited words’, Analytic Philosophy, 54(3), 350–363.
Archard, D. (2014), ‘Insults, free speech and offensiveness’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 31(2), 127–141.
Bell, D. A. & Mo, Y. (2014), ‘Harmony in the world 2013’, Social Indicators Research, 118(2), 797–818.
Bentham, J. (1822), ‘Letters to Count Toreno, on the proposed penal code’, in J. Bowring (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Volume 8, Edinburgh: William Tait, pp. 487–554.
Bhengu, M. J. (1996), Ubuntu: The Essence of Democracy, Cape Town: Novalis Press.
Boisvert, D. (2008), ‘Expressive-assertivism’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 89(2), 169–203.
Camp, E. (2013), ‘Slurring perspectives’, Analytic Philosophy, 54(3), 330–349.
Croom, A. M. (2011), ‘Slurs’, Language Sciences, 33(3), 343–358.
Croom, A. M. (2013), ‘How to do things with slurs’, Language and Communication, 33(3), 177–204.
Dandala, M. (2009), ‘Cows never die: Embracing African cosmology in the process of economic growth’, in M. F. Murove (ed.), African Ethics, Pietermaritzburg: KwaZulu-Natal Press, pp. 259–277.
Feinberg, J. (1985), Offence to Others, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feldman, F. (1978), Introductory Ethics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Gaie, J. (2007), ‘The Setswana concept of botho’, in J. Gaie & S. Mmolai (eds.), The Concept of Botho and HIV/AIDS in Botswana, Eldoret: Zapf Chancery, pp. 29–43.
Graness, A. (2019), ‘Ubuntu and buen vivir’, in J. Ogude (ed.), Ubuntu and the Reconstitution of Community, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 150–175.
Grice, P. (1957), ‘Meaning’, The Philosophical Review, 66(3), 377–388.
Gyekye, K. (2010), ‘African ethics’, in E. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/african-ethics/.
Hay, R. (2013), ‘Hybrid expressivism and the analogy between pejoratives and moral language’, European Journal of Philosophy, 21(3), 450–474.
Himma, K. (2002), ‘On the definition of unconscionable racial and sexual slurs’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 33(3), 512–522.
Hom, C. (2008), ‘The semantics of racial epithets’, Journal of Philosophy, 105(8), 416–440.
Hom, C. (2010), ‘Pejoratives’, Philosophy Compass, 5(2), 164–185.
Hornsby, J. (2001), ‘Meaning and uselessness: how to think about derogatory words’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 25(1), 128–141.
Jeshion, R. (2013a), ‘Expressivism and the offensiveness of slurs’, Philosophical Perspectives, 27(1), 231–259.
Jeshion, R. (2013b), ‘Slurs and stereotypes’, Analytic Philosophy, 54(3), 314–329.
Letseka, M. (2000), ‘African philosophy and educational discourse’, in P. Higgs et al. (eds.), African Voices in Education, Cape Town: Juta, pp. 179–193.
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2014), Born Free and Equal?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Metz, T. (2020), ‘Relational normative economics: An African theory of justice’, Ethical Perspectives, 27(1), 35–68.
Metz, T. (2021a), ‘Ubuntu: The good life’, revised edition, in F. Maggino (ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 2nd ed., Cham: Springer, pp. 1–5.
Metz, T. (2021b), A Relational Moral Theory: African Ethics in and Beyond the Continent, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Metz, T. & Miller, S. C. (2016), ‘Relational ethics’, in H. LaFollette, (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 1–10.
Mkhize, N. (2008), ‘Ubuntu and harmony’, in R. Nicolson (ed.), Persons in Community: African Ethics in a Global Culture, Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, pp. 35–44.
Mnyaka, M. & Motlhabi, M. (2005), ‘The African concept of ubuntu/botho and its socio-moral significance’, Black Theology, 3(2), pp. 215–237.
Mokgoro, Y. (1998), ‘Ubuntu and the law in South Africa’, Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 1(1), 15–26.
Neu, J. (2008), Sticks and Stones: The Philosophy of Insults, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nkondo, G. M. (2007), ‘Ubuntu as a public policy in South Africa: A conceptual framework’, International Journal of African Renaissance Studies, 2(1), 88–100.
Nkulu-N’Sengha, M. (2009), ‘Bumuntu’, in M. K. Asante & A. Mazama (eds), Encyclopedia of African Religion, Los Angeles: Sage, 142–147.
Rawls, J. (1999), A Theory of Justice, revised edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Richard, M. (2008), When Truth Gives Out, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tutu, D. (1999), No Future Without Forgiveness, New York: Random House.
Whiting, D. (2013), ‘It’s not what you said, it’s the way you said it: Slurs and conventional implicatures’, Analytic Philosophy, 54(3), 364–377.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
