Géneros naturales y definición de vida

A critical view of the metaphysical perspective of life

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.374851
Keywords: definicion de vida, géneros naturales, metafísica, epistemología, dicotomía natural-convencional

Abstract

In the contemporary philosophy of biology, some authors claim that life is better undertood as a natural kind (Cleland and Chyba 2002, Diéguez 2013). This paper questions the metaphysical commitments related to the natural kind approach in relation with the debate of defining life. The goal of this paper is to show how considering life as a natural kind carries out some difficulties and costs. Those difficulties have been partialy shown by Bich and Green (2018) concerning the essentialist view of natural kinds. In this paper we extended this criticism to other ways of understanding natural kinds and we argue that such a difficulties are due to the acceptance of an inadequate frame of reference, based on a naïve idea of naturalness and on a natural/conventional dichotomy that is not properly justified.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benner, S.A. Ricardo, A. Carrigan, M.A. (2004), «Is there a common chemical model for life in the universe?» Current opinion in chemical biology 8(6), pp. 672-689

Bich, L., Green S. (2018), «Is Defining Life Pointless? Operational Definitions at the Frontiers of Biology», Synthese, 195(9), pp. 3919–3946.

Borghini, A., Casetta, E. (2012), «Quel che resta dei generi naturali», Rivista di estética, 49, pp. 247-273.

Boyd, R. (1988). «How to be a moral realist», en: G. Sayre-McCord (Ed.), Essays on Moral Realism. Cornell University Press, pp. 181-228.

Boyd, R. (1991), «Realism, anti-realism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds», Philosophical Studies, 61(1), pp. 127–148.

Boyd, R. (1999), «Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa», en: R.Wilson (Ed.), Species: New interdisciplinary essays (pp. 141–185). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Brigandt, I. (2003), «Species Pluralism Does Not Imply Species Eliminitivism», Philosophy of Science 70 (Proceedings): pp. 1305–1316.

Brigandt I. (2011), «Natural kinds and concepts: A pragmatist and methodologically naturalistic account», en: J. Knowles & H. Rydenfelt (Eds.), Pragmatism, science and naturalism (pp. 171–196). Berlin: Peter Lang Publishing.

Cleland C.E., Chyba C.F. (2002), «Defining ‘life’», Origins of Life and Evolution of the biosphere 32(4), pp. 387–393.

Cleland, C. E. (2012; 2011), «Life without definitions», Synthese, 185(1), 125-144.

Cleland C.E., Copley S.D. (2005), «The possibility of alternative microbial life on Earth», International Journal of Astrobiology 4(3-4), pp. 166-173

Craver, C. F. (2009), «Mechanisms and natural kinds», Philosophical Psychology, 22 (5), pp. 575–594.

Devitt, M. (2010), «Species Have (Partly) Intrinsic Essences», Philosophy of Science 77, pp. 648-661.

Diéguez, A. (2007), «La relatividad conceptual y el problema de la verdad: Bases para un realismo ontológico moderado» Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía 12, pp. 71-91.

Diéguez, A. (2008), «¿Es la vida un género natural? Dificultades para lograr una definicion del concepto de vida», ArtefaCToS 1, pp. 81-100.

Diéguez, A. (2013), «Life as a homeostatic property cluster», Biological Theory, 7(2), pp. 180-186.

Dupré, J. (1981), «Natural kinds and biological taxa», Philosophical Review 90, pp. 66-90.

Dupré, J. (1993), Disorders of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Dupré, J. (1999), «Are whales fish», en: D. Medin, & S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 461-476) MIT Press

Ellis, B. (2001), Scientific Essentialism Cambridge University Press.

Ereshefsky, M. (1992), «Eliminative pluralism». Philosophy of Science, 59(4), pp. 671–690.

Ereshefsky, M. (2010), «What's wrong with the new biological essentialism», Philosophy of Science, 77(5), pp. 674-685.

Ferreira, M., Umerez, J. (2018), «Dealing with the changeable and blurry edges of living things: a modified version of property-cluster kinds», European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8, pp. 493–518.

Ghiselin, M. T. (1974), «A radical solution to the species problem», Systematic Biology, 23(4), pp. 536–544.

Griffiths PE. (2004), «Emotions as Natural and Normative Kinds Philosophy of science» 71, pp. 901-911.

Hacking, I. (2007), «Natural Kinds: Rosy Dawn, Scholastic Twilight», Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 61, pp. 203-239.

Hermida, M. (2016), «Life on earth is an individual», Theory in Biosciences, 135(1), pp. 37-44.

Hull, D. L. (1976), «Are species really individuals?», Systematic Biology, 25(2), pp. 174–191.

Keller, E. F. (2002), Making sense of life: Explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Khalidi, M. (2013), Natural Categories and Human Kinds. Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lange, M. (1996), «Life, "artificial life," and scientific explanation». Philosophy of Science, 63(2), pp. 225-244.

Luisi, PL. (1998), «About various definitions of life» Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere, 28, pp. 613-622

Luisi, PL. (2006), «The Emergence of Life. From Chemical Origins to Synthetic Biology». Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Machery E. (2012), «Why I Stopped Worrying about the Definition of Life... and Why You Should as Well», Synthese 185(1), pp. 145–164

Magnus, PD. (2012), Scientific Enquiry and Natural Kinds. From Planets to Mallards, Palgrave-Macmillan, Springer.

Mariscal, C., Doolittle, W. F. (2018), «Life and life only: a radical alternative to life definitionism», Synthese, pp. 1-15.

Maturana Romesín, H., & Varela, F. J. (2008), De máquinas y seres vivos: Autopoiesis : La organización de lo vivo (7ª ed.). Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.

Moreno, A. & Fernández. J. (1997), «Definición de vida y universalización de la biología ». Arbor, 621, pp. 101-112.

Okasha, S. (2002), «Darwinian metaphysics: Species and the question of essentialism» Synthese, 131 (2), pp. 191-213.

Pace, N. R. (2001), «The universal nature of biochemistry», Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(3), 805-808. doi:10.1073/pnas.98.3.805

Popa, R. (2004), Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life. Heidelberg: Springer.

Putnam, H. (1988), Razón, verdad e historia. Madrid: Madrid: Tecnos.

Putnam, H. (1999), The Threefold Cord , New York, Columbia University Press.

Reydon, T. A. (2009), «Species and kinds: a critique of Rieppel’s “one of a kind” account of species», Cladistics.

Ruiz-Mirazo, K., Peretó J., Moreno A., (2004), «A universal definition of life: autonomy and open-ended evolution», Origins of Life and Evolution of the biosphere 34 (3), pp. 323–346.

Slater, M. (2014), «Natural Kindness», The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66, pp. 375–411

Smith, K.C. (2016), «Life is hard: countering definitional pessimism concerning the definition of life», International Journal of Astrobiology 15, pp. 277-289

Tirard, S., Morange, M., Lazcano, A. (2010), «The Definition of Life: A brief History of an Elusive Scientific Endeavor», Special Collection of Essays: What is Life? Astrobiology, 10(10), pp. 1003-1009.

Tuomela, R. (1985), Science, Action, and Reality, Dordrecht: Reidel.

Published
01-05-2021
How to Cite
Amilburu Martínez, A., & Soler Parra, J. (2021). Géneros naturales y definición de vida: A critical view of the metaphysical perspective of life. Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia, (83), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.374851
Issue
Section
Artículos