The overcoming of the paradoxes of the interpreting subject in Wittgenstein and Apel: Through Frege or Peirce?

Authors

  • Carlos Maria Ortiz de Landázuri Profesor jubilado
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon/352811
Keywords: Common World, Language game, pragmatic maxim, communication community

Abstract

Wittgenstein and Apel sought to define the formal constitutive of the language interpreter subject based on the Frege or Peirce proposals, but in both cases their proposals ended up becoming paradoxical. First, Wittgenstein for not being able to ground it in a critical-transcendental way based on a notion of metaphysical "I" nor on behavioral language games in themselves that also do not allow to refer to some interpreter signs, in the way demanded by Frege. Anyway, later, Apel would have proposed to avoid these paradoxes by means of a pragmatic-transcendental interpretation of the interpreting subject starting from Peirce, although finally it would prove how the same type of paradoxes would also be fostered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anscombe, E. (1957) Intetions, Blackwell, Oxford, 1957; Intención, Paidós, Barcelona, 1991.

Apel, Dorotea (2018) "Recuerdos de mi padre", en García Marza, D.; Lozano Aguilar, J. F,; Martínez Navarro, E.; Siurana Aparisi, J. C. (eds); Ética y filosofía política. Homenaje a Adela Cortina. Tecnos, Madrid.

Apel, K. O. (1973), Transformación de la filosofía, T I-II, Suhrkamp; (1985) Taurus, Madrid.

Apel, K.O. (2018); Racionalidad crítica comunicativa. Volumen I, Nicolás, J. A.; Molina Molina, L. (eds.); Editorial Comares, Granada.

Dilman, I. (1998); Language and Reality: Modern Perspectives on Wittgenstein, Peeters, Leuven.

Honneth, A.(2001), Leiden an Unbestimmtheit. Eine Reaktualisierung der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie, Reclam Stuttgart.

Honneth, A. (2010). The Pathologies of Individual Freedom. Hegel’s Social Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010.

Llano, A. (1983) Metafísica y lenguaje, Eunsa, Pamplona.

Ortiz de Landázuri, C. (2018), La rehabilitación de la persona después de Wittgenstein y Apel, en Anscombe y Llano. ¿A través de Aristóteles o de nuevo Frege?, Contrastes.

Rorty, R. (2005), El pragmatismo, una versión, Ariel, Barcelona.

Standisch, P., (1992), Beyond the Self: Wittgenstein, Heidegger and the Limits of Language, Avebury, Aldershot.

Wittgenstein, L. (1958), Philosophical Investigation, Blackwell, Londres; (1988), Investigaciones Filosóficas, Crítica, Barcelona.

Wittgenstein, L. (1922), Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Routledge; (1937, 1ª, 1973, 2ª), Alianza, Madrid.

Published
27-10-2019
How to Cite
Ortiz de Landázuri, C. M. (2019). The overcoming of the paradoxes of the interpreting subject in Wittgenstein and Apel: Through Frege or Peirce?. Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia, (78), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon/352811