Validity Evidence of Sportsmanship Coaching Behaviors Scale (SCBS) for the Brazilian Context

Validity Evidence of Sportsmanship Coaching Behaviors Scale (SCBS) for the Brazil

This is an outdated version published on 07-01-2023. Read the most recent version.

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/cpd.434191
Keywords: fair play, coaches, sport, scale, psychometry

Abstract

Abstract. The sports coach is considered one of the most influential figures for the athletes, being important count on measures that can assess their fair play behavior. In this sense, the present study aimed to adapt and verify validity evidence based on the internal structure of the Sportsmanship Coaching Behavior Scale (SCBS) for the Brazilian sports context. Initially, translations, cultural adaptations and content validity of the SCBS were performed, with the participation of 20 young athletes (average age 15.44 ± 2.53) and five specialist doctors in the field of sport psychology. The content validity demonstrated that the items of the instrument were clear and relevant (CVCs between 0.80 and 1.00) and that they were evaluating the correct dimensions (Kappa ≥ 0.70). To verify the construct validity of the SCBS, 302 young athletes of both sexes participated (mean age 16.1 ± 3.61). Using the FACTOR statistical program, an exploratory factor analysis identified a factorial structure with four factors, explaining 69% of the total variance, composed of 20 items distributed in the factors: Prioritizes winning over good sportsmanship - PV (α = 0.85, ω = 0.87); Teaches good sportsmanship - EBEE (α = 0.83, ω = 0.85); Is a model of good sportsmanship - MBEE (α = 0.72, ω = 0.77); and Punishes the poor sportsmanship - PPEE (α = 0.70, ω = 0.74). Future studies are necessary to confirm this factorial structure and expand the evidence of validity of SCBS for the Brazilian context, carrying out analyzes based on external variables, for example.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jair Nunes Rocha, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco - Univasf

Mestre em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco - UNIVASF com bolsa da CAPES (2017-2018). Graduado em Psicologia pela mesma instituição de ensino (2012-2016). Participa desde 2014 do Grupo de Pesquisa em Psicometria e Psicologia do Esporte (GPPPE) coordenado pela Professora Doutora Marina Pereira Gonçalves, onde desenvolve pesquisas relacionadas a Avaliação Psicológica, Psicologia do Esporte e Psicometria.

Marina Pereira Gonçalves, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco - Univasf

Doutora em Psicologia Social pela Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Professora do curso de Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco (Univasf). Docente permanente nos Programas de Pós-graduação (Mestrado) em Psicologia e Educação Física da Univasf. Lider do do Grupo de Pesquisa em Psicometria e Psicologia do Esporte (GPPPE).

José Roberto Andrade do Nascimento Júnior, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco - Univasf

Doutor em Educação Física pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação Associado UEM/UEL, com estágio Sanduíche como pesquisador visitante em Estudos do Esporte, na linha de Psicologia do Esporte, na University of Stirling/Scotland-UK (2014). Atualmente é Professor da Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco (Univasf) e é docente permanente nos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física e de Psicologia da Univasf.

Josefa Eugênia Tenório Tavares, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco - Univasf

Mestranda em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco (UNIVASF). Especialista em Neuropsicologia pela Faculdade da Região Serrana do Espírito Santo (FARESE). Integrante do Grupo de Pesquisa em Psicometria e Psicologia do Esporte (GPPPE) coordenado pela Profª Drª Marina Pereira Gonçalves. Bolsista da Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE). 

Amanda Fernandes Rocha, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco - Univasf

Graduanda no Curso de Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco (Univasf); bolsista de Iniciação científica da Univasf e membro do Grupo de Pesquisas em Psicometria e Psicologia do Esporte (GPPPE), coordenado pela Profª Drª Marina Pereira Gonçalves.

Sofia Marques de Moura Fé, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco - Univasf

Graduanda no Curso de Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco (Univasf); bolsista de Iniciação científica da Univasf e membro do Grupo de Pesquisas em Psicometria e Psicologia do Esporte (GPPPE), coordenado pela Profª Drª Marina Pereira Gonçalves.

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

Ato, M., López, J. J. & Benavante, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicologia. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511.

Baglin, J. (2014). Improving your exploratory factor analysis for ordinal data: A demonstration using FACTOR. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19(5). https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol19/iss1/

Bolter, N. D., & Kipp, L. E. (2016). Sportspersonship coaching behaviours, relatedness need satisfaction, and early adolescent athletes’ prosocial and antisocial behaviour. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029802.

Bolter, N. D., Kipp, L., & Johnson, T. (2018). Teaching Sportsmanship in Physical Education and Youth Sport: Comparing Perceptions of Teachers With Students and Coaches With Athletes, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 209-217. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jtpe/37/2/article-p209.xml

Bolter, N. D., & Weiss, M. R. (2012). Coaching for character: Development of the Sportsmanship Coaching Behaviors Scale (SCBS). Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 1(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026300.

Bolter, N. D., & Weiss, M. R. (2013). Coaching behaviors and adolescent athletes' sportspersonship outcomes: Further validation of the Sportsmanship Coaching Behaviors Scale (SCBS). Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 2(1), 32. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0029802

Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: some considerations. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22(53), 423-432. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2012000300014

Ceulemans, E. & Kiers, H. A. L. (2006). Selecting among three-mode principal component models of different types and complexities: A numerical convex hull based method. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711005x64817

Damásio, J. C. & Dutra, D. F. (2017). Análise Fatorial Exploratória: Um tutorial com o software Factor. In B. F. Damásio & J. C. Borsa (Eds.), Manual de desenvolvimento de instrumentos psicológicos (pp. 241-266). São Paulo: Vetor.

Damásio, B. F. (2012). Uso da análise fatorial exploratória em psicologia. Avaliação Psicológica, 11(2), 213-227.

Erkut, S. (2010). Developing Multiple Language Versions of Instruments for Intercultural Research. Child Development Perspective, 4(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00111.x

Evangelista, P. H. M. (2011). As atitudes morais no esporte de competição: um estudo descritivo-exploratório com atletas dos jogos coletivos de invasão (Dissertação de Mestrado). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre.

Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions. Psicothema 29 (2), 236-240. http://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.304

Gimeno, F., Sáenz, A., Ariño, J. y Aznar, M. (2007). Deportividad y violencia en el fútbol base: un programa de evaluación y de prevención de partidos de riesgo. Revista Psicología del Deporte 16(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1578-84232015000100020

Goretzko, D., Pham, T.T.H. & Bühner, M. (2019). Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Current Psychology. Online. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00300-2

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (2014). Análise Multivariada de Dados. Porto Alegre: Ed Bookman.

Hernández-Nieto, R. A. (2002). Contribuciones al análisis estadístico. Mérida, Venezuela: Universidad de Los Andes/IESINFO.

Hodge, K., & Gucciardi, D. F. (2015). Antisocial and prosocial behavior in sport: The role of motivational climate, basic psychological needs, and moral disengagement. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 37 (3), 257-273. http://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2014-0225

Hodge, K. & Lonsdale, C. (2011). Prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport: the role of coaching style, autonomous vs. controlled motivation, and moral disengagement. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.4.527

International Fair Play Committee (2012). The essence of fair-play and history. http://www.fairplayinternational.org.

International Test Commission - ITC. (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second edition). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf

Kavussanu, M. (2008). Moral behaviour in sport: A critical review of the literature. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840802277417

Kavussanu, M., & Boardley, I. D. (2009). The prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport scale. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 31(1), 97-117. http://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.1.97

Kavussanu, M. & Stanger, N. (2017). Moral behavior in sport. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16, 185-192. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.010

Lambert, J. (2013). How does coach behaviour change the motivational climate? A values-based approach to coaching sport in divided societies. In J. Whitehead, H. Telfer, & J. Lambert (Eds.), Values in Youth Sport and Physical Education (pp. 230-237). Routledge.

Lara, D., & Alexis, S. (2014). ¿Matrices policóricas/ tetracóricas o matrices pearson? Un estudio metodológico. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 6(1), 39-48. doi: http://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v6.n1.6357

López-Mora, C; Flores, M.C; Valdivia-Moral, P; Olivares, M.C; González-Hernández, J. (2021). Enseñando valores y potenciando la prosocialidad. Lo que promueven los entrenadores y lo que interiorizan los deportistas. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 21(2), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.6018/cpd.447181

Lorenzo-Seva, U. (1999). Promin: a method for oblique factor rotation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34,347-356. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3403_3

Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2011). The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46,340-364. http://doi.org/10.1 080/00273171.2011.564527

McAllister, S. G., Blinde, E. M., & Weiss, W. M. (2000). Teaching values and implementing philosophies: Dilemmas of the youth sport coach. The Physical Educator, 57, 35– 45.

Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., Maier, K. S., Wolfe, E. W., & Reckase, M. D. (2006). Athletes' evaluations of their head coach's coaching competency. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 77(1), 111-121. http://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2006.10599337

Pasquali, L. (2012). Análise fatorial para pesquisadores. Brasília: LabPAM.

Peláez, S., Aulls, M. W., & Bacon, S. L. (2016). Morality in sport: The coach's perspective. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 11(2), 237-249. http://doi.org/10.1177/1747954116637494

Pesca, A. D. (2013). Avaliação da eficácia de treinamento na percepção de treinadores de modalidades esportivas. (Tese de Doutorado). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.

Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145. http://doi.org/10.1007/S11336-008-9102-Z

Rouquette, A., & Falissard, B. (2011). Sample size requirements for the internal validation of psychiatric scales. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20(4), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.352

Sáenz, A., Gimeno, F., Gutiérrez, H., Lacambra, D., Arroyo del Bosque, R., and Marcén, C. (2015). Evaluación de la violencia y deportividad en el deporte: Un análisis bibliométrico. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 15, 211-222. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1578-84232015000100020

Sáenz Ibáñez, A.; Gimeno Marco, F.; Gutierrez Pablo, H.; Lacambra Correas, D. (2019). Evaluation of the Sportsmanship-Aggression Continuum in Youth Football. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 28, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1578-84232012000200007

Shields, D. L., & Bredemeier, B. L. (2007). Advances in sport mortality research. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed, pp. 662-684). New York: John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118270011.ch30

Shields, D. L., LaVoi, N. M., Bredemeier, B. L., & Power, F. C. (2007). Predictors of poor sportspersonship in youth sports: Personal attitudes and social influences. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 747-762. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.29.6.747

Sireci, S. G., Yang, Y., Harter, J., & Ehrlich, E. J. (2006). Evaluating guidelines for test adaptations: A methodological analysis of translation quality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(5), 557-567. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022022106290478

Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 17(2), 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x

Ventura-León, J. L., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente Omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidade. Niñez y Juventud, 15 (1), 625-627.

Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med, 37(5), 360-363. http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~julia/courses/CS6998/Interrater_agreement.Kappa_statistic.pdf

Published
07-01-2023
Versions
How to Cite
Nunes Rocha, J., Pereira Gonçalves, M., Andrade do Nascimento Júnior, J. R., Tenório Tavares, J. E. ., Fernandes Rocha, A., & Marques de Moura Fé, S. (2023). Validity Evidence of Sportsmanship Coaching Behaviors Scale (SCBS) for the Brazilian Context: Validity Evidence of Sportsmanship Coaching Behaviors Scale (SCBS) for the Brazil. Sport Psychology Notebooks, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.6018/cpd.434191
Issue
Vol. 23 No. 1 (2023): CPD1(2023)
Section
Ciencias del Deporte

Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:

1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.

2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.

Licencia Creative Commons

3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.