Masculinity and Femininity: A multidimensional approach
Abstract
The research on Masculinity and Femininity has a long history. Despite this, there is still discussion about the nature of these concepts. In the present study, the development of the Oviedo Gender Roles Scale (GRSO) is presented. A sample of 612 participants belonging to general Spanish population is used (Myears = 34.2; SDyears = 15.9). The dimensionality, discrimination indices, reliability and evidence of convergent and divergent validity of the instrument were studied. In addition, differences in general (Big Five model) and specific personality traits based on sex were measured and an ANCOVA was performed controlling the variables of Masculinity and Femininity. A good fit to a three-factor multidimensional structure, with Cronbach’s alphas indicating good reliability (Socioemotional = .75; Comparison = .81; Aggressiveness = .77) and adequate evidence of validity were observed. Differences based on sex were observed in various personality traits, but when controlling for Masculinity and Femininity, such differences disappeared. ERGO is a reliable and valid test for the study of gender roles. The implication of a multidimensional approach on Masculinity and Femininity is discussed.
Downloads
References
Agam, R., Tamir, S., y Golan, M. (2015). Gender differences in respect to self-esteem and body image as well as response to adolescent's school-based prevention programs. Journal of Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry, 2(5), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.15406/jpcpy.2015.02.00092
Andrade, C. (2016). Adaptation and factorial validation of the attitudes toward gender roles scale. Paideía, 26(63), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272663201602
Araújo, A. M., Assis-Gomes, C. M., Almeida, L. S., y Núñez, J. C. (2019). A latent profile analysis of first-year university students’ academic expectations. Annals of Psychology, 35(1), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.35.1.299351
Baber, K. M., y Tucker, C. J. (2006). The Social Roles Questionnaire: A new approach to measuring. Sex Roles, 54, 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9018-y
Baquerín, I. S. (2017). Masculinities, sexuality and gender [Masculinidades, sexualidad y género] [Acta]. Congreso Internacional de la Red española de Filosofía. Madrid, España
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215
Bonilla-Algovia, E. (2021). Acceptance of ambivalent sexism in trainee teachers in Spain and Latin America countries. Annals of Psychology, 37(2), 253-264. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.441791
Bria, P., Gómez Yepes, T., Etchezahar, E., y Ungaretti, J. (2020). Chivalry as a mediator between authoritarianism and gender roles. Psicología, Conocimiento y Sociedad, 10(3), 34-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.26864/pcs.v10.n3.3
Ceballo-Fontes, M., y Oramas, M. J. (2015). Traditional gender roles and type C personality in breast-cancer diagnosed women [Roles de género tradicionales y personalidad tipo c en mujeres con diagnóstico de cáncer de mama]. Ciencia ergo sum, 23(3), 229-238.
Choi, N., Fuqua, D.R., y Newman, J.L. (2006). Hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 818-832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406299106
Choi, N., y Fuqua, D. R. (2003). The structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A summary report of 23 validation studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(5), 872–887. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258235
Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959-353505057611
Cordero, A., Pamos, A., y Seisdedos, N. (2008). NEO PI-R, Personality Inventory NEO Revised [NEO PI-R, Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado]. TEA Ediciones.
Costa, P. T., y McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 3(2), 123-139.
Cuesta, M., Suárez-Álvarez, J., Lozano, L., García-Cueto, E., y Muñiz, J. (2018). Assessment of eight entrepreneurial personality dimensions: Validity evidence of the BEPE battery. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02352.
Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., y Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
Fernández, J. (2011). A century of masculinity and femininity research: A critical review [Un siglo de investigaciones sobre masculinidad y feminidad: Una revisión crítica]. Psicothema, 23(2), 167-172.
Fernández, J., Quiroga, A., Escorial, S., y Privado, J. (2014). Explicit and implicit assessment of gender roles. Psicothema, 26(2), 244-251. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.219
Fernández, J., Quiroga, M. A., del Olmo, I., y Rodríguez, A. (2007). Masculinity and femininity scales: state of the art [Escalas de masculinidad y feminidad: Estado actual de la cuestión]. Psicothema, 19(3), 357-365.
Ferradás, M.-del-M., Freire, C., Rodríguez-Martínez, S., y Piñeiro-Aguín, I. (2018). Profiles of self-handicapping and self-esteem, and its relationship with achievement goals. Annals of Psychology, 34(3), 545-554. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.3.319781
Ferrando, P. J., y Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2014). Exploratory Item Factor Analysis: Some additional considerations. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1170-1175. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199991
Fornell, C., y Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18, 30–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Furnham, A., y Treglown, L. (2021). Sex differences in personality scores on six scales: Many significant, but mostly small, differences. Current Psychology, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01675-x
García-Cueto, E., Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J., Bringas-Molleda, C., López-Cepero, J., Paíno-Quesada, S., y Rodríguez-Franco, L. (2015). Development of the gender role attitudes scale (GRAS) amongst young spanish people. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.10.004
Haig, D. (2004). The inexorable rise of gender and the decline of sex: Social change in academic titles, 1945–2001. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(2), 87-86. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000014323.56281.0d
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., y Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Hernández, A., Ponsoda, V., Muñiz, J., Prieto, G., y Elosua, P. (2016). Review of the model to assess the quality of the tests used in Spain [Revisión del modelo para evaluar la calidad de los tests utilizados en España]. Papeles del Psicologo, 37(3), 192–197.
Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of structural equation modeling. Guilford press.
Hu, L.-t., y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Lenhard, W., y Lenhard, A. (2016). Calculation of effect sizes. Psychometrica. https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html.
López-Sáez, M. A., y García-Dauder, D. (2020). Masculinity/femininity tests as psychological technologies for gender control [Los test de masculinidad/feminidad como tecnologías psicológicas de control de género]. Athenea Digital, 20(2), e2521. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.2521
Lopez-Zafra, E., Sánchez-Álvarez, N., y Carmona-Cobo, I. (2021). Is ambition a gendered issue? Students´ vs employees´ antecedents of Ambition about Leadership. Annals of Psychology, 37(2), 352-360. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.435341
Lorenzo-Seva, U., y Ferrando, P. J. (2020). FACTOR (Versión 10.10.03) [Computer software]. Universitat Rovira i Virgili. https://psico.fcep.urv.es/utilitats/factor/Download.html
Mac Giolla, E., y Kajonius, P. J. (2018). Sex differences in personality are larger in gender equal countries: Replicating and extending a surprising finding. International Journal of Psychology, 54(6), 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12529
Mateo, M. A., y Fernández, J. (1991). The dimensionality of masculinity and femininity concepts [La dimensionalidad de los conceptos de masculinidad y feminidad]. Investigaciones Psicológicas, 9, 95-116.
Money, J., Hampson, J. G., y Hampson, J. L. (1955). An examination of some basic sexual concepts: The evidence of human hermaphroditism. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 97(4), 301–319.
Moya, M., y Moya-Garófano, A. (2021). Evolution of gender stereotypes in Spain: From 1985 to 2018. Psicothema, 33(1), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.328
Official College of Psychologists of the Principality of Asturias (2015). Ethical Code of the Official College of Psychologists of the Principality of Asturias [Código deontológico del Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias] http://www.cop-asturias.org/@ASThiar_JUN/uploads/ deonto/Codigo Deontologico-COPPA-2015.pdf
Organic Law 3/2018, of December 5, on the Protection of Personal Data and guarantee of digital rights. (2018). Boletín Oficial del Estado, 294, section I, December 6, 2018, 119788 to 119857. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/lo/2018/12/05/3/dof/spa/pdf
Pedrosa, I., Suárez-Álvarez, J., Pérez-Sánchez, B., y García-Cueto, E. (2010). Effect of sex and masculinity-femininity on some cognitive and personality aspects [Efecto del sexo y de la masculinidad-feminidad sobre algunos aspectos cognitivos y de personalidad]. Revista de psicología general y aplicada, 63(1-2), 23-32.
Postigo, Á., García-Cueto, E., Muñiz, J., González-Nuevo, C., y Cuesta, M. (2021). Measurement invariance of entrepreneurial personality in relation to sex, age, and self-employment. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01685-9
Schmitt, D. P., Long, A. E., McPhearson, A., O'brien, K., Remmert, B., y Shah, S. H. (2017). Personality and gender differences in global perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 52, 45-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12265
Smith, M., Sherry, S., Vidovic, V., Saklofske, D., Stoeber, J., y Benoit, A. (2019). Perfectionism and the five-factor model of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318814973.
Timmerman, M. E., y Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.). (2015). APA dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14646-000
Ward, C. A. (2000). Models and measurements of psychological androgyny: A cross-cultural extension of theory and research. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 43(8), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007171500798
World Economic Forum. (2020). Global Gender Gap (Report 2020).
Copyright (c) 2022 Servicio de Publicaciones, University of Murcia (Spain)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.