Beyond Field Studies: An analogue comparison of NICHD and MoGP forensic interview guidelines in children’s testimony
Abstract
This analogue study compares the effectiveness of two forensic interview protocols—the NICHD Protocol and the Memorandum of Good Practice (MoGP)—in eliciting accurate and forensically relevant information from children. A total of 123 children (60 aged 6–7 and 63 aged 10–11) participated in a staged event, followed by a delayed interview conducted using either the NICHD or MoGP guidelines. Interviewers were postgraduate students who received protocol-specific training. Transcripts were coded for prompt type and the amount, accuracy, and relevance of elicited details. Generalized linear mixed models revealed that interviews conducted using the NICHD Protocol elicited more total, correct, central, and peripheral details, particularly through invitations and cued invitations. Option-posing prompts were the least effective, yielding the fewest correct and peripheral details. Age-related differences in productivity and accuracy were attenuated after controlling for the informativeness of prompt types. Option-posing questions were frequently used in both conditions, including NICHD-guided interviews. These findings highlight the critical role of prompt formulation in shaping children’s narrative responses and underscore the relative advantages of the NICHD Protocol. They further suggest that enhanced interviewer training is needed to reduce reliance on less effective prompt types and to promote best practices in investigative interviewing.
Downloads
-
Abstract0
-
pdf0
-
xml0
References
Ahern, E. C., & Lamb, M. E. (2017). Children’s Reports of Disclosure Recipient Reactions in Forensic Interviews: Comparing the NICHD and MoGP Protocols. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9205-x
Aldridge, J., & Cameron, S. (1999). Interviewing Child Witnesses: Questioning Techniques and the Role of Training. Applied Developmental Science, 3(2), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0302_7
Alonso-Quecuty, M. L., & Hernández-Fernaud, E. (1997). Tócala otra vez Sam: repitiendo las mentiras. Estudios de Psicología, 18(57), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093997320972025
Andrews, S. J., Lamb, M. E., & Lyon, T. D. (2015). Question Types, Responsiveness and Self-contradictions when Prosecutors and Defense Attorneys Question Alleged Victims of Child Sexual Abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(2), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3103
Benia, L. R., Hauck-Filho, N., Dillenburg, M., & Stein, L. M. (2015). The NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 24(3), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2015.1006749
Brown, D. A., Lamb, M. E., Lewis, C., Pipe, M. E., Orbach, Y., & Wolfman, M. (2013). The NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol: An analogue study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19(4), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035143
Bull, R. (2014). Investigative interviewing. Springer.
Cederborg, A. C., Alm, C., Lima da Silva Nises, D., & Lamb, M. E. (2013). Investigative interviewing of alleged child abuse victims: An evaluation of a new training programme for investigative interviewers. Police Practice and Research, 14(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2012.712292
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Cyr, M., & Lamb, M. E. (2009). Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD investigative interview Protocol when interviewing French-speaking alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Quebec. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(5), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.04.002
Danby, M. C., & Sharman, S. J. (2023). Open-ended initial invitations are particularly helpful in eliciting forensically relevant information from child witnesses. Child Abuse & Neglect, 146, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106505
Dent, H. R. (1986). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning mentally handicapped child witnesses. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1986.tb00666.x
Dent, H. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1979). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1979.tb00302.x
Dion, J., & Cyr, M. (2008). The Use of the NICHD Protocol to Enhance the Quantity of Details Obtained from Children with Low Verbal Abilities in Investigative Interviews: A Pilot Study. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 17(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538710801916564
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Fernandes, D., Gomes, J. P., Albuquerque, P. B., & Matos, M. (2024). Forensic Interview Techniques in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: A Scoping Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(2), 1382–1396. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231177317
Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Charles C. Thomas.
Gagnon, K., & Cyr, M. (2017). Sexual abuse and preschoolers: Forensic details in regard of question types. Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.022
Henry, L. A., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1999). Eyewitness Memory and suggestibility in Children With Mental Retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 104(6), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(1999)104<0491:EMASIC>2.0.CO;2
Henry, L. A., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). Eyewitness memory, suggestibility, and repeated recall sessions in children with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities. Law and Human Behavior, 27(5), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025434022699
Herman, S. (2010). The role of corroborative evidence in child sexual abuse evaluations. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7(3), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.122
Hershkowitz, I. (2001). Children’s responses to open-ended utterances in investigative interviews. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532501168190
Hershkowitz, I., & Lamb, M. E. (2020). Allegation rates and credibility assessment in forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims: Comparing the revised and standard NICHD protocols. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000230
Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., & Katz, C. (2014). Allegation rates in forensic child abuse investigations: Comparing the revised and standard NICHD protocols. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(3), 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037391
Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Katz, C., & Malloy, L. C. (2015). Does enhanced rapport-building alter the dynamics of investigative interviews with suspected victims of intra-familial abuse? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-013-9136-8
Home Office. (1992). Memorandum of Good Practice on Video Recorded Interviews with Child Witness for Criminal Proceedings. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Hutcheson, G. D., Baxter, J. S., Telfer, K., & Warden, D. (1995). Child witness statement quality: Question type and errors of omission. Law and Human Behavior, 19(6), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499378
Job, R., Brunel, M., & Przygodzki-Lionet, N. (2025). Child Interviewing Practices: Effects of the Implementation of the NICHD Protocol Training in France. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 40(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-024-09707-5
Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67
Kask, K. (2012). Dynamics in Using Different Question Types in Estonian Police Interviews of Children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 324–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1831
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Korkman, J., Santtila, P., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2006). Dynamics of verbal interaction between interviewer and child in interviews with alleged victims of child sexual abuse. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00498.x
La Rooy, D., Brubacher, S. P., Aromäki-Stratos, A., Cyr, M., Hershkowitz, I., Korkman, J., Myklebust, T., Naka, M., Peixoto, C. E., Roberts, K. P., Stewart, H., & Lamb, M. E. (2015). The NICHD protocol: a review of an internationally-used evidence-based tool for training child forensic interviewers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 1(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-01-2015-0001
Lamb, M. E., Brown, D. A., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2018). Tell Me What Happened. Questioning Children About Abuse (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Lamb, M. E., & Fauchier, A. (2001). The effects of question type on self-contradictions by children in the course of forensic interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(5), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.726
Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., Hovav, M., Manor, T., & Yudilevitch, L. (1996). Effects of Investigative Utterance Types on Israeli Children’s Responses. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19(3), 627–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502549601900310
Lamb, M. E., La Rooy, D., Malloy, L. C., & Katz, C. (2011). Children’s testimony: a handbook of psychological research and forensic practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31(11–12), 1201–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Abbott, C. B. (2007). Does the type of prompt affect the accuracy of information provided by alleged victims of abuse in forensic interviews? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(9), 1117–1130. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1318
Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Sternberg, K. J., Aldridge, J., Pearson, S., Stewart, H. L., Esplin, P. W., & Bowler, L. (2009). Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances the quality of investigative interviews with alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Britain. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1489
Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Mitchell, S. (2002). Is Ongoing Feedback Necessary to Maintain the Quality of Investigative Interviews with Allegedly Abused Children? Applied Developmental Science, 6(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0601_04
Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., Stewart, H., & Mitchell, S. (2003). Age differences in young children’s responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 926–934. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.926
Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Esplin, P. W. (2002). The Effects of Intensive Training and Ongoing Supervision on the Quality of Investigative Interviews With Alleged Sex Abuse Victims. Applied Developmental Science, 6(3), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0603_2
Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2021). Rapport quality in investigative interviews: effects on open-ended questions and free recall responses. Police Practice and Research, 22(1), 996–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2020.1786691
London, K., Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Shuman, D. W. (2005). Disclosure of Child Sexual Abuse: What Does the Research Tell Us About the Ways That Children Tell? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(1), 194–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.194
London, K., Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Shuman, D. W. (2007). Disclosure of Child Sexual Abuse: A review of the Contemporary Empirical Literature. In M. E. Pipe, M. E. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A.-C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child Sexual Abuse: Disclosure, Delay, and Denial (pp. 159–174). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203936832
London, K., Bruck, M., Wright, D. B., & Ceci, S. J. (2008). Review of the contemporary literature on how children report sexual abuse to others: Findings, methodological issues, and implications for forensic interviewers. Memory, 16(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701725732
Lyon, T. D. (2014). Interviewing Children. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030913
Melinder, A., Magnusson, M., & Gilstrap, L. L. (2021). What Is a Child-Appropriate Interview? Interaction Between Child Witnesses and Police Officers. International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice, 3(4), 369–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-020-00052-8
Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2002). Back to basics: a componential analysis of the original cognitive interview mnemonics with three age groups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(7), 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.825
Oates, K., & Shrimpton, S. (1991). Children’s Memories for Stressful and Non-Stressful Events. Medicine, Science and the Law, 31(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/002580249103100102
Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2000). Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(6), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00137-X
Orbach, Y., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Enhancing children’s narratives in investigative interviews. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(12), 1631–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00207-6
Orbach, Y., & Lamb, M. E. (2001). The relationship between within-interview contradictions and eliciting interviewer utterances. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(3), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00254-4
Pereda, N., & Forns, M. (2007). Prevalencia y características del abuso sexual infantil en estudiantes universitarios españoles. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(4), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.08.010
Pipe, M. E., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., & Cederborg, A. C. (2007). Child Sexual Abuse: Disclosure, Delay and Denial. In M. E. Pipe, M. E. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A. C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child Sexual Abuse: Disclosure, Delay, and Denial. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203936832
Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (1995). Interviewing Preschoolers: Effects of Nonsuggestive Techniques, Parental Coaching, and Leading Questions on Reports of Nonexperienced Events. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60(1), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1995.1035
Powell, M. B., & Guadagno, B. (2008). An Examination of the Limitations in Investigative Interviewers’ Use of Open-Ended Questions. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 15(3), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710802101621
Powell, M. B., & Hughes-Scholes, C. H. (2009). Evaluation of the Questions Used to Elicit Evidence About Abuse from Child Witnesses: Australian Study. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710902930325
Principe, G. F., & London, K. (2022). How parents can shape what children remember: Implications for the testimony of young witnesses. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000059
Saywitz, K. J., & Camparo, L. B. (2014). Evidence-based child forensic interviewing: The developmental narrative elaboration interview: Interviewer guide. In Evidence-based child forensic interviewing: The developmental narrative elaboration interview: Interviewer guide. Oxford University Press.
Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Davies, G. M., & Westcott, H. L. (2001). The Memorandum of Good Practice: theory versus application. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(5), 669–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00232-0
Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., & Hershkowitz, I. (1996). Child Sexual Abuse Investigations in Israel. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(2), 322–337. https://doi.org/0803973233
Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Mitchell, S. (2001). Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances young children’s responses to free-recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.997
Stromwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Children’s Repeated Lies and Truths: Effects on Adults’ Judgments and Reality Monitoring Scores. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12(2), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.12.2.345
Verkampt, F., & Ginet, M. (2010). Variations of the cognitive interview: Which one is the most effective in enhancing children’s testimonies? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(9), 1279–1296. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1631
Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004). Let me inform you how to tell a convincing story: CBCA and reality monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching, and deception. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 36(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087222
World Health Organization. (2024). Child Maltreatment. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/child-maltreatment
Yi, M., Jo, E., & Lamb, M. E. (2016). Effects of the NICHD Protocol Training on Child Investigative Interview Quality in Korean Police Officers. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9170-9
Yi, M., & Lamb, M. E. (2018). The effects of narrative practice on children’s testimony and disclosure of secrets. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(3), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3385
Copyright (c) 2026 The authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
About Copyright and Licensing, more details here.


