La eficacia de la visualización en la carga cognitiva y la resolución de problemas en estudiantes superdotados y no superdotados

Alroqi, T. M. (2021). An investigation into the acceptance of augmented reality in Saudi Arabian schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).

Bertrand, M. G., Sezer, H. B., & Namukasa, I. K. (2024). Exploring AR and VR tools in mathematics education through culturally responsive peda-gogies. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 10(3), 462–486.

Bin Kamarudin, M. F., Bin Kamarulzaman, M. H., Saifun, M., Bin Mohd Sha-rif, A., Saali, M. M. S. N., & Esrati, M. Z. (2021). The impact of differen-tiated instructions on the motivation of gifted students: A study about age and gender differences. Education, 12(1), 24–32.

Çayir, A., & Balci, E. (2023). The effect of differentiated instruction on gifted students’ critical thinking skills and mathematics problem-solving atti-tudes. Educational Research and Reviews, 18(12), 392–398.

Boaler, J. (2022). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative mathematics, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. John Wiley & Sons.

Boonmoh, A., & Jumpakate, T. (2019). Using scaffolded instructions to im-prove students’ skills. Reflections, 26(1), 1–16.

Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of in-struction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332.

Cirneanu, A. L., & Moldoveanu, C. E. (2024). Use of digital technology in in-tegrated mathematics education. Applied System Innovation, 7(4), 66.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2023). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2021). Paradigms of gifted education: A guide for theory-based, practice-focused research. Routledge.

Ebikawa, Y. G. (2023). Culturally responsive mathematics education: How mathematics has been taught globally and where we are in the US (Doctoral dissertation, Al-liant International University).

Elsayed, S. A., & Al-Najrani, H. I. (2021). Effectiveness of augmented reality on improving visual thinking in mathematics and academic motivation for middle school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Tech-nology Education, 17(8), em1991. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11069

Fadel, C., & Groff, J. S. (2019). Four-dimensional education for sustainable societies. In Sustainability, human well-being, and the future of education (pp. 269–281). Springer.

Findell, B., Swafford, J., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press.

Flavin, E., Hwang, S., & Flavin, M. T. (2025). Augmented reality for mathe-matics achievement: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects. Inter-national Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–26.

Fokuo, M. O., Opuku-Mensah, N., Asamoah, R., Nyarko, J., Agyeman, K. D., Owusu-Mintah, C., & Asare, S. (2023). The use of visualization tools in teaching mathematics in colleges of education: A systematic review. Online Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1).

Goyibova, N., Muslimov, N., Sabirova, G., Kadirova, N., & Samatova, B. (2025). Differentiation approach in education: Tailoring instruction for diverse learner needs. MethodsX, 103163.

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of re-search on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Information Age Publishing.

Lanuza, M. H. (2020). Integrative gamification technique in teaching speciali-zation courses in mathematics. International Journal of Scientific and Technolo-gy Research, 9(4), 1275–1281.

Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9

Lin, C. Y., & Wu, H. K. (2021). Effects of different ways of using visualiza-tions on high school students’ electrochemistry conceptual understand-ing and motivation towards chemistry learning. Chemistry Education Re-search and Practice, 22(3), 786–801.

Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Hegarty, M. (2019). The influence of spatial visualiza-tion training on students’ spatial reasoning and mathematics perfor-mance. Journal of Cognition and Development, 20(5), 729–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2019.1653298

Maloy, R. W., Verock, R. E. A., Edwards, S. A., & Woolf, B. P. (2016). Trans-forming learning with new technologies. Pearson.

Manuel, D., & Freiman, V. (2017). Differentiating instruction using a virtual environment: A study of mathematical problem posing among gifted and talented learners. Global Education Review, 4(1).

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 85–139). Academic Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). Cambridge University Press.

Mehrfar, A., Zolfaghari, Z., Bordbar, A., & Mohabbat, Z. (2024). Influencing factors on the success of mobile learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, 42(3), e09.

Mokmin, N. A. M., Hanjun, S., Jing, C., & Qi, S. (2024). Impact of an AR-based learning approach on the learning achievement, motivation, and cognitive load of students in a design course. Journal of Computers in Educa-tion, 11(2), 557–574.

Nardi, E. (2014). Reflections on visualization in mathematics and in mathe-matics education. In B. Sriraman (Ed.), Mathematics & mathematics educa-tion: Searching for common ground (pp. 193–220). Information Age Publish-ing.

Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors, 35(4), 737–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089303500412

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instruction-al design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.

Papert, S. (2020). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.

Renzulli, J. S. (2021). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmen-tal model for promoting creative productivity. In J. S. Renzulli, Reflections on gifted education (pp. 55–90). Routledge.

Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mo-bile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning perfor-mance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. Mestre & B. Ross (Eds.), Psy-chology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press.

Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Taylor & Francis.

Voulgari, N., Panagopoulos, M., & Garneli, V. (2024). A systematic review of augmented reality in mathematics education: Fostering learning through art integration. Arts & Communication, 4446.

Zhang, Y., Wang, P., Jia, W., Zhang, A., & Chen, G. (2023). Dynamic visuali-zation by GeoGebra for mathematics learning: A meta-analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–22.

Zuo, M., Kong, S., Ma, Y., Hu, Y., & Xiao, M. (2023). The effects of using scaffolding in online learning: A meta-analysis. Education Sciences, 13(7), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070705

‏