Características psicométricas del módulo general del cuestionario FertiQoL en una muestra española de mujeres infértiles
Agencias de apoyo
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico (HUP) La FE de Valencia
- Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness under Grant PSI2017-82487-R
Resumen
Antecedentes: El diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la fertilidad repercuten en la calidad de vida de las personas. FertiQoL es un cuestionario desarrollado internacionalmente para medir la calidad de vida específica de la fertilidad. La obtención de información fiable sobre el impacto de los problemas de fertilidad permite a los sistemas sociales y sanitarios desarrollar una atención integrada centrada en el valor. Objetivo: El objetivo del presente estudio es examinar la dimensionalidad, validez y fiabilidad del Core FertiQol en una muestra de mujeres españolas en tratamiento de fertilidad. Método: Se realizó un estudio transversal, administrando el cuestionario Core FertiQoL a 564 mujeres con problemas de fertilidad. Se realizaron análisis descriptivos de los datos sociodemográficos y clínicos de la muestra. Se comprobaron las propiedades psicométricas del FertiQoL realizando análisis factoriales confirmatorios, calculando los valores medios de la varianza extraída, la validez, la fiabilidad y los coeficientes de correlación entre escalas. Resultados: Se obtuvieron cuatro factores (Emocional, Mente/Cuerpo, Relacional y Social). Todos los estadísticos presentaron valores adecuados (RMSEA y SRMR inferiores a 0.09 y CFI y TLI superiores a 0.9). La fiabilidad quedó demostrada con el índice CR de cada factor superior a 0.7 y el AVE superior a 0.5. Conclusiones: El Core FertiQol presenta un ajuste aceptable para las mujeres españolas con problemas de fertilidad. Ofrece un canal de comunicación entre profesionales y pacientes, así como información precisa en sus subescalas sobre áreas que pueden reflejar deterioro de la CdV. El FertiQol básico es un instrumento que permite identificar áreas que requieren apoyo, proporcionando información valiosa para el diseño de programas sociosanitarios eficientes centrados en valores para personas con infertilidad.
Descargas
Citas
Aarts, J. W., van Empel, I. W., Boivin, J., Nelen, W. L., Kremer, J. A., & Verhaak, C. M. (2011). Relationship between quality of life and distress in infertility: a validation study of the Dutch FertiQoL. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 26(5), 1112–1118. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der051
Abraham, A. D. (2019). Perceptions of Social Support in Infertility (Order No. 27540026). Available from ProQuest One Academic. (2317708017). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/perceptions-social-support-infertility/docview/2317708017/se-2
Ariffin, F., Daud, S., Ismail, Z., Zainuddin, A. A., & Ramli, R. (2020). Language and cross-cultural influences in the psychometric evaluation of the Malaysian FertiQoL. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 16(2), 157–163. https://medic.upm.edu.my/upload/dokumen/2020042010203122_MJMHS_0259.pdf
Asazawa, K., Jitsuzaki, M., Mori, A., Ichikawa, T., Shinozaki, K., Yoshida, A., Kawanami, M., & Kamiyama, K. (2018). Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the fertility quality of life (FertiQol) tool for couples undergoing fertility treatment. Open Journal of Nursing, 8(9), 616–628. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2018.89046
Bakhtiyar, K., Beiranvand, R., Ardalan, A., Changaee, F., Almasian, M., Badrizadeh, A., Bastami, F., & Ebrahimzadeh, F. (2019). An investigation of the effects of infertility on Women's quality of life: a case-control study. BMC Women's Health, 19(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0805-3
Boivin, J., & Smith, L. (2005). Infertility-related stress in men and women predicts treatment outcome 1 year later. Fertility and Sterility, 83(6), 1745–1752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12. 039
Boivin, J., Takefman, J., & Braverman, A. (2011). The Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQol) tool: Development and general psychometric properties. Fertility and Sterility, 96(2), 409–415.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.046
Bunting, L., & Boivin, J. (2010). Development and preliminary validation of the fertility status awareness tool: FertiSTAT. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 25(7), 1722–1733. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq087
Chachamovich, J. R., Chachamovich, E., Ezer, H., Fleck, M. P., Knauth, D., & Passos, E. P. (2010). Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: A systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 31, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X. 2010.481337
Chu, K., Zhang, Q., Han, H., Xu, C., Pang, W., Ma, Y., Sun, N., & Li, W. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of nonpharmacological adjuvant interventions for patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 139(3), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12310
Donarelli, Z., Lo Coco, G., Gullo, S., Salerno, L., Marino, A., Sammartano, F., & Allegra, A. (2016). Psychology and counselling. The Fertility Quality of Life Questionnaire (FertiQoL) Relational subscale: psychometric properties and discriminant validity across gender. Human Reproduction, 2061–2071. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew168
Dura-Ferrandis, E., Bonilla-Campos, A., & Alhambra-Borras, T. (2023). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FertiQoL measure in couples undergoing infertility treatment. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 1–15. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2023.2180623
Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. Structural equation modeling: A second course, 10(6), 269-314.
Gameiro, S., Verhaak, C. M., Kremer, J. A., & Boivin, J. (2013). Why we should talk about compliance with assisted reproductive technologies (ART): a systematic review and meta-analysis of ART compliance rates. Human Reproduction Update, 19(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms045
Gameiro, S., & Finnigan, A. (2017). Long-term adjustment to unmet parenthood goals following ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 23(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmx001
Gdańska, P., Drozdowicz-Jastrzębska, E., Grzechocińska, B., Radziwon-Zaleska, M., Węgrzyn, P., & Wielgoś, M. (2017). Anxiety and depression in women undergoing infertility treatment. Ginekologia Polska, 88(2), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2017.0019
Goetz, L. H., & Schork, N. J. (2018). Personalized medicine: motivation, challenges, and progress. Fertility and sterility, 109(6), 952–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.006
Greil, AL, Slauson-Blevins, K., McQuillan, J., Lowry, MH, Burch, AR y Shreffler, KM (2018). Satisfacción de la relación entre parejas infértiles: Implicaciones de género y autoidentificación. [Relationship satisfaction among infertile couples: Implications for gender and self-identification.] Revista de Asuntos Familiares, 39 (5), 1304–1325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X17699027
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Hubens, K., Arons, A. M. M., & Krol, M. (2018). Measurement and evaluation of quality of life and well-being in individuals having or having had fertility problems: a systematic review. The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care: the official journal of the European Society of Contraception, 23(6), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2018.1539161
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jagadeeswari, J., Lokeswari, S., Priyadarsini, A., Cecyli, C., & Jebapriya, J. J. (2022). Level of Stress and Perceived Social Support among Women Seeking Infertility Treatment: An Exploratory Study. Cardiometry, (25), 208-212. https://10.18137/cardiometry.2022.25.208212
Jestrović, J., & Mihić, I. (2020). Satisfaction with the medical staff support in the process of dealing with infertility. Psihološka Istraživanja, 23(2), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2019.5314
Jung, Y. J., & Kim, H. Y. (2017). Factors influencing infertility-related quality of life in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques: focusing on depression and resilience. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 23(2), 117-125. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2017.23.2.117
Juniarto, A. Z., Fulyani, F., Herlina, E. C., Paramesthi, P., Ariani, M. D., & Iskandarsyah, A. (2021). The validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of fertility quality of life (FertiQol) questionnaire. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 17(3), 209–215. https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20211944
Kahyaoglu Sut, H., & Balkanli Kaplan, P. (2015). Quality of life in women with infertility via the FertiQoL and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales. Nursing & health sciences, 17(1), 84-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12167
Kamboj, N., Saraswathy, K. N., Prasad, S., Babu, N., Puri, M., Sharma, A., Dhingra, S., Sachdeva, M. P., & Mahajan, C. (2023). Women infertility and common mental disorders: A cross-sectional study from North India. PloS one, 18(1), e0280054. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280054
Keramat, A., Masoomi, S. Z., Mousavi, S. A., Poorolajal, J., Shobeiri, F., & Hazavhei, S. M. (2014). Quality of life and its related factors in infertile couples. Journal of research in health sciences, 14(1), 57–63.
Kiani, Z., Simbar, M., Hajian, S., Zayeri, F., Shahidi, M., Saei Ghare Naz, M., & Ghasemi, V. (2020). The prevalence of anxiety symptoms in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility Research and Practice, 6, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00076-1
Kiesswetter, M., Marsoner, H., Luehwink, A., Fistarol, M., Mahlknecht, A., & Duschek, S. (2020). Impairments in life satisfaction in infertility: Associations with perceived stress, affectivity, partnership quality, social support and the desire to have a child. Behavioral medicine (Washington, D.C.), 46(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2018.1564897
Kitchen, H., Aldhouse, N., Trigg, A., Palencia, R., & Mitchell, S. (2017). A review of patient-reported outcome measures to assess female infertility-related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15, 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0666-0
Koert, E., Takefman, J., & Boivin, J. (2021). Fertility quality of life tool: update on research and practice considerations. Human fertility (Cambridge, England), 24(4), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2019.1648887
Kulaksiz, D., Toprak, T., Ayribas, B., Ozcan, E., Arslan, U., & Dokuzeylul Gungor, N. (2022). The effect of male and female factor infertility on women's anxiety, depression, self-esteem, quality of life and sexual function parameters: a prospective, cross-sectional study from Turkey. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 306(4), 1349–1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06713-y
Li, J., Long, L., Liu, Y., He, W., & Li, M. (2016). Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on fertility quality of life and pregnancy rates among women subjected to first in vitro fertilization treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 77, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.010
Luk, B., & Loke, A. (2015). The Impact of Infertility on the Psychological Well-Being, Marital Relationships, Sexual Relationships, and Quality of Life of Couples: A Systematic Review. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(6), 610-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2014.958789
Maroufizadeh, S., Ghaheri, A., Amini, P., & Samani, R. O. (2017). Psychometric properties of the fertility quality of life instrument in infertile Iranian women. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility, 10(4), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2016.4696
Mousavi, S. A., Masoumi, S. Z., Keramat, A., Pooralajal, J., & Shobeiri, F. (2013). Assessment of questionnaires measuring quality of life in infertile couples: a systematic review. Journal of reproduction & infertility, 14(3), 110–119.
Pedro, J., Frederiksen, Y., Schmidt, L., Ingerslev, H. J., Zachariae, R., & Martins, M. V. (2019). Comparison of three infertility-specific measures in men and women going through assisted reproductive technology treatment. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(6), 738–749. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1359105316678669
Rooney, K. L., & Domar, A. D. (2018). The relationship between stress and infertility. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 20(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2018.20.1/klrooney
Schweiger, U., Schweiger, J., & Schweiger, J. (2018). Mental Disorders and Female Infertility. Archives of Psychology, 2(6), 1-14
Sexty, R. E., Hamadneh, J., Rösner, S., Strowitzki, T., Ditzen, B., Toth, B., & Wischmann, T. (2016). Cross-cultural comparison of fertility specific quality of life in German, Hungarian and Jordanian couples attending a fertility center. Health and quality of life outcomes, 14 (27). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0429-3
Sexty, R. E., Griesinger, G., Kayser, J., Lallinger, M., Rösner, S., Strowitzki, T., Toth, B., & Wischmann, T. (2018). Psychometric characteristics of the FertiQoL questionnaire in a German sample of infertile individuals and couples. Health Quality Life Outcomes, 16(1), 233. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955- 018-1058-9
The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. (1995). Social Science & Medicine (1982), 41(10), 1403–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k
Valsangkar, S., Bodhare, T., Bele, S., & Sai, S. (2011). An evaluation of the effect of infertility on marital, sexual satisfaction indices and health-related quality of life in women. Journal of human reproductive sciences, 4(2), 80.
Vander Borght, M., & Wyns, C. (2018). Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clinical Biochemistry, 62, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012
Volpini, L., Mazza, C., Mallia, L., Guglielmino, N., Rossi Berluti, F., Fernandes, M., & Violani, C. (2020). Psychometric properties of the FertiQoL questionnaire in Italian infertile women in different stages of treatment. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 38(3), 324–339. https://doi. org/10.1080/02646838.2019.1698017
Wadadekar, G. S., Inamdar, D. B., & Nimbargi, V. R. (2021). Assessment of Impact of Infertility & its Treatment on Quality of Life of Infertile Couples using Fertility Quality of Life Questionnaire. Journal of human reproductive sciences, 14(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_163_20
World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). International classification of Diseases, 11th revision (ICD- 11). WHO
World Health Organization (2020). Infertility Fact Sheet. Geneva: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility (April 2022, date last accessed).
World Health Organization. (2023). Infertility prevalence estimates: 1990–2021. World Health Organization. xiv, 79 p.
Woods, B. M., Bray, L. A., Campbell, S., Holland, A., Mrug, S., & Ladores, S. (2023). A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 21(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02125-x
Wu, M. H., Chong, K. S., Huey, N. G., Ou, H. T., & Lin, C. Y. (2021). Quality of life with pregnancy outcomes: Further evaluating item properties for refined Taiwan’s FertiQoL. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 120(3), 939–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2020.09.015
Derechos de autor 2024 Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia (España)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2024
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
