La influencia del apoyo social percibido en el compromiso académico entre adolescentes: el papel mediador de la autoeficacia
Agencias de apoyo
- This publication is part of the I+D+i project PID2020-119411RB-I00, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033/ and FE-DER “A way to make Europe”.
Resumen
El compromiso académico se ve influenciado por factores ambientales y personales, como el apoyo social percibido y la autoeficacia. Ambos factores se han convertido en unos de los elementos más importantes en el contexto académico, debido a sus relaciones con el ajuste escolar de los adolescentes. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la influencia del apoyo social percibido de los amigos y de la familia sobre el compromiso académico, así como comprobar si la autoeficacia juega un papel mediador en la relación entre ambas variables. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal. La muestra constaba de 802 estudiantes de secundaria, con una edad media de 13.65 años (SD = 1.24) (donde el 50.6% eran mujeres y el 49.4% hombres). Los resultados mostraron la existencia de relaciones positivas entre apoyo social percibido y las dimensiones del compromiso académico. Los modelos de mediación mostraron el efecto directo del apoyo social percibido en el compromiso académico y el efecto indirecto del apoyo social percibido en el compromiso académico cuando la autoeficacia media en esta relación. En conclusión, se recomienda promover la autoeficacia y una trayectoria académica positiva, debido a la implicación del apoyo social percibido de amigos y familiares en la trayectoria escolar y compromiso hacia los estudios.
Descargas
Citas
Adams, A. M., Wilson, H., Money, J., Palmer-Conn, S., & Fearn J. (2020). Student engagement with feedback and attainment: the role of academic self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1640184
Adler-Constantinescu, C., Besu, E. C., & Negovan, V. (2013). Perceived social support and perceived self-efficacy during adolescence. Procedia. Social and Behavoral. Science, 78, 275–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.294
Ahmed, U., Umrani, W. A., Qureshi, M. A., & Samad, A. (2018). Examining the links between teachers support, academic efficacy, academic resilience, and student engagement in Bahrain. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5, 39–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.09.008
Allari, R. S., Atout, M., & Hasan, A. A. H. (2020). The value of caring behavior and its impact on students’ self-efficacy: perceptions of undergraduate nursing students. Nursing Forum, 55(2), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12424
Anderman, L. H., Andrzejewski, C. E., & Allen, J. (2011). How do teachers support students’ motivation and learning in their classrooms? Teachers College Record, 113(5), 969-1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300502
Baessler, J., & Schwarcer, R. (1996). Evaluación de la autoeficacia: Adaptación española de la escala de Autoeficacia General. Ansiedad y Estrés, 2, 1-8.
Bandura, A. (1987). Pensamiento y acción. Martínez Roca.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychology Review, 84, 191–215. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (2012). Social cognitive theory in M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. P. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 349–373). Sage Publications Ltd.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Harvard University.
Carlson, M. D. A., & Morrison, R. S. (2009). Study Design, Precision, and Valididy in Observational Studies. Journal Palliative Medicine, 12, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2008.9690
Carmeli, A., Peng, A. C., Shaubroeck, J. M., & Amir, I. (2020). Social support as a source of vitality among college students: the moderating role of social self-efficacy. Psychology in the Schools, 58(2), 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22450
Cassel, J. (1976). The contribution of the social environment to host resistance. American Journal of Epidemiology, 104, 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112281
Chu, R. J., & Chu, A. Z. (2010). Multi-level analysis of peer support, internet self-efficacy and e-learning outcomes-the contextual effects of collectivism and group potency. Computers & Education, 55, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.011
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum Associates.
Doménech-Betoret, F., Abellan-Rosello, L., & Gomez-Artiga, A. (2017). Self-efficacy, satisfaction, and academic achievement: the mediator role of students’ expectancy-value beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2017.01193
Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Wouters, S., Leeuwen, K. V., Bijttebier, P., Noortgate, W. V., Goossensc, L., & Verschuerenc, K. (2019). Adolescents’ peer status profiles and differences in school engagement and loneliness trajectories: a person-centered approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 75, 101759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101759
Estell, D. B., & Perdue, N. (2013). Social support and behavioral and affective school engagement: The effects of peers, parents, and teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 50(4), 325-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.21681
Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015). A new look at social support: a theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Socical Psychology Review, 19(2), 113–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314544222
Fife, J. E., Bond, S., & Byars-Winston, A. (2011). Correlates and predictors of academic self-efficacy among African-American students. Education, 132(1), 141-148.
Fredericks, J. A., Parr, A. K., Amemiya, J. L., Wang, M. T., & Bauer, S. (2019). What matters for urban adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: a Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Adolescence Research, 34, 491–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558419830638
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
García-Bacete, F. J. G., Coll, P. F., Casares, M. I. M., & Perrin, G. M. (2014). Las relaciones del profesorado con el alumnado en aulas del ciclo inicial de Educación Primaria. Adaptación del Questionnaire on Teacher InteractionEarly Primary (QTI-EP). Revista de Psicodidáctica, 19(1), 211-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.9081
Garcia-Reid, P., Peterson, C. H., & Reid, R. (2015). Parent and teacher support among Latino immigrant youth: Effects on school engagement and school trouble avoidance. Education and Urban Society, 47(3), 328-343. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0013124513495278
Geven, S., Weesie, J., & Van Tubergen, F. (2013). The influence of friends on adolescents’ behavior problems at school: the role of ego, alter and dyadic characteristics. Social Networks, 35, 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.08.002
González, M. T., & Landero, R. (2014). Psychometric properties of the social support from parents and friends scale (AFA-R) in a student sample. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 4(2), 1469-1480.
Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationship to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431693013001002
Gremmen, M. C., Van den Berg, Y., Steglich, C., Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2018). The importance of near-seated peers for elementary students' academic engagement and achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 57, 42-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.04.004
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
Hiver, P., Al.Hoorie, A., Vitta, J., & Wu, J. (2024). Engagement in language learning: a systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 201-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
Hossain, U., Arefin, S., & Yukongdi, V. (2014). Personali traits, social self-efficacy, social support, and social entrepreneurial intention: the moderating role of gender. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2021.1936614
Hou, C., Wen, Y., Liu, X., & Dong, M. (2021). Impacts of regional water shortage information disclosure on public acceptance of recycled water—evidences from China’s urban residents. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123965
IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. IBM Corp.
Juvonen, J., Espinoza, G., & Knifsend, C. (2012). The role of peer relationships in student academic and extracurricular engagement in S. Christenson, A. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 387–401), Springer Science.
Kiefer, S., Alley, K., & Ellerbrock, C. (2015). Teacher and peer support for young adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and school belonging. Research in Middle Level Education, 38(8), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2015.11641184
Komendantova, N., Yazdanpanah, M., & Shafiei, R. (2018). Studying young people’ views on deployment of renewable energy sources in Iran through the lenses of social cognitive theory. AIMS Energy, 6, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2018.2.216
Kuo, T. M., Tsai, C., & Wang, J. (2021). Linking web-based learning self-efficacy and learning engagement in MOOCs: the role of online academic hardiness. International Higher Education, 51, 10089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100819
Lam, S., Wong, B. H., Yang, H., & Liu, Y. (2012). Understanding student engagement with a contextual model in S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 403-419). Springer Science. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_19
Lee, S., Kwon, S., & Ahn, J. (2021). The effect of modeling on self-efficacy and flow state of adolescent athletes through role models. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661557
Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
Liu, C., Huang, N., Fu, M., Zhang, H., Feng, X. L., & Guo, J. (2021). Relationship between risk perception, social support, and mental health among general Chinese population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Risk Management Healthcare Policy, 14, 1843. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S302521
Llorca, A., Cristina, R. M., & Malonda, E. (2017). Parenting, peer relationships, academic self-efficacy, and academic achievement: direct and mediating effects. Frontiers in Psychology 8, 2120. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2017.02120
Masud, H., Ahmad, M. S., Jan, F. A., & Jamil, A. (2016). Relationship between parenting styles and academic performance of adolescents: mediating role of self-efficacy. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17, 121–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9413-6
Mérida-López, S., Sánchez-Gómez, M., & Extremera, N. (2020). Leaving the teaching profession: examining the role of social support, engagement and emotional intelligence in teachers’ intentions to quit. Psychosoccial Intervention, 29(3), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2020a10
Mizumoto, A. (2013). Effects of self-regulated vocabulary learning process on self-efficacy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 253-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2013.836206
Motti-Stefanidi, F., & Masten, A. S. (2013). School success and school engagement of immigrant children and adolescents: A risk and resilience developmental perspective. European Psychologist, 18(2), 126-135. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1027/1016-9040/a000139
Newmann, F. M. (1992). Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary School. Teachers College Press.
Nguyen, T. D., Cannata, M., & Miller, J. (2016). Understanding student behavioral engagement: importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359
Olivier, E., Archambault, I., De Clercq, M., & Galand, B. (2019). Student self-efficacy, classroom engagement, and academic achievement: comparing three theoretical frameworks. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 326-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0952-0
Park, S., & Yun, H. (2017). The influence of motivational regulation strategies on online students’ behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement. American Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1412738
Pierce, K. D., & Quiroz, C. S. (2019). Who matters most? Social support, social strain, and emotions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 3273–3292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518817400
Pinel-Martínez, C., Pérez-Fuentes, M. C., & Carrión-Martínez, J. J. (2019). Relación entre género, resiliencia y autoconcepto académico y social en la adolescencia. Revista de Psicología Educativa, 14(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.23923/rpye2019.02.176
Rigo, Y., & Donolo, D. (2019). Family involvement and school commitment: the challenge of building bridges. Psicologia da Educaçao, 48, 25-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/2175-3520.20190004
Rossi, T., Trevisol, A., dos Santos-Nunes, D., Dapieve-Patias, N., & Von Hohendorff, J. (2020). Perceived overall self-efficacy and motivation to learn in high school teenagers. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 23(1), 264-271. http://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2020.23.1.12
Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2008). Gender differences in the relationship between perceived social support and student adjustment during early adolescence. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 496-514. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1045-3830.23.4.496
Sadegh J., Doshmangir, L., Khoshmaram, N., Shakibazadeh, E., Mashhadi, H., & Khabiri, R. (2024). Key factors affecting health promoting behaviours among adolescents : a scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 24(58), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10510-x
Sahil, S. A., & Hashim, R. (2011). The roles of social support in promoting adolescents’ classroom cognitive engagement through academic self-efficacy. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 49–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.32890/mjli.8.2011.7626
Salmela-Aro, K., Tang, X., Symonds, J., & Upasyaya, K. (2021). Student engagement in adolescence: a scoping review of longitudinal studies 2010-2020. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(2), 256-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12619
Shao, Y., & Kang, S. (2022). The link between parent-child relationship and learning engagement among adolescents: the chain mediating roles of learning motivation and academic self-efficacy. Frontiers in Education, 7, 854549. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.854549
Shin, H., & Chang, Y. (2022). Relational support from teachers and peers matters: links with different profiles of relational support and academic engagement. Journal of School Psychology, 92, 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.03.006
Shyr, W., Hsieh, Y., & Chen, C. (2021). The effects of peer-based instant response system to promote learning performance, intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy. Sustainability, 13, 4320. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084320
Sivandani, A., Ebrahimi, S., & Vahidi, T. (2013). The Relation Between Social Support and Self-efficacy with Academic Achievement and School Satisfaction among Female Junior High School Students in Birjand. Procedia social and behavioral Sciences, 84, 668-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.623
Sökmen, Y. (2019). The role of self-efficacy in the relationship between the learning environment and student engagement. Educational Studies, 45, 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1665986
Surjadi, F. F., Lorenz, F. O., Wickrama, K. A. S., & Conger, R. D. (2011). Parental support, partner support, and the trajectories of mastery from adolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 34(4), 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.adolescence.2010.10.001
Tam, C. L., Lee, T. H., Har, W. M., & Pook, W. L. (2011). Perceived social support and self-esteem towards gender roles: Contributing factors in adolescents. Asian Social Science, 7(8), 49. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n8p49
Tortosa, B. M., Pérez-Fuentes, M. C., & Molero, M. M. (2023). Mediating role of emotional intelligence in the relationsgip between resilience and academic engagement in adolescents: Differences between men and women. Psychology Research and Behaviour Management, 16, 2721-2733. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s421622
Tortosa, B. M., & Pérez-Fuentes, M. C. (2024). Design and validation of general scale of academic engagement for Spanish adolescents (CAADE). Heliyon, 10(1), e23732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23732
Tvedt, M. S., Bru, E., & Idsoe, T. (2019). Perceived teacher support and intentions to quit upper secondary school: direct, and indirect associations via emotional engagement and boredom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1659401
Vandenbroucke, J. P., Elm, E. V., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., & Strobe Initiative. (2007). Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). Epidemiology, 18, 805–835. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0b013e3181577511
Vogel, F. R., & Human-Vogel, S. (2016). Academic commitment and self-efficacy as predictors of academic achievement in additional materials science. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(6), 1298-1310. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1144574
Wang, M., & Eccles, J. (2012). Social support matters: longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x
Wang, M., Degol, J. L., & Henry, D. A. (2019). An integrative development in sociocultural context model for children’s engagemet in learning. American Psychologist, 74(9), 1086-1102. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/amp0000522
Wang, M. T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem, behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85, 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138
Waters, L., & Loton, D. (2021). Tracing the growth, gaps, and characteristics in positive education science: a long-term, large-scale review of the field. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 774967. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774967
Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. (2022). Student engagement: current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
Wu, H., Li, S., Zheng, J., & Guo, J. (2020). Medical students’ motivation and academic performance: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Medical Education Online, 25, 1742964. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F10872981.2020.1742964
Xin, Z. (2022). Perceived social support and college student engagement: moderating effects of a grateful disposition on the satisfaction of basic psychological needs as a mediator. BMC Psychology, 10, 298. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-01015-z
Yang, J., & Wang, X. (2019). The impact of perceived social support on college students’ learning engagement: the mediating role of academic self-efficacy. Advances in Social Sicence, Education and Humanities Research, 369, 442-452. https://doi.org/10.2991/ichess-19.2019.94
Yang, Y., Yuan, Y., Tan, H., Wang, Y., & Li, G. (2021). The linkages between Chinese children’s both cognitive engagement and emotional engagement and behavioral engagement: mediating effect of perceptions of classroom interactions in math. Psychology in Schools, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22571
Yazdanpanah, M., Feyzabad, F. R., Forouzani, M., Mohammadzadeh, S., & Burton, R. J. F. (2015). Predicting farmers’ water conservation goals and behavior in Iran: a test of social cognitive theory. Land Use Policy, 47, 401–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.022
Yazzie-Mintz, E., & McCormick, K. (2012). Finding the humanity in the data: understanding, measuring, and strengthening student engagement in S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wiley (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 743–761). Springer.
Zhang, H. (2018). The Effects of Teachers’ Autonomy-Support Intervention on Pupils’ Intrinsic Motivation Engagement and Academic. Northeast Normal University, Changchun.
Zhao, Y., Zheng, Z., Pan, C., & Zhou, L. (2021). Self-esteem and academic engagement among adolescents: a moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 690828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.690828
Zhen, R., Liu, R., Ding, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Y., & Xu, L. (2017). The mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and academic emotions in the relation between basic psychological needs satisfaction and learning engagement among Chinese adolescent students. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.017
Zhen, R., Ru-De, L., Ming-Te, W., Ding, Y., Jiang, R., Fu, X., & Sun, Y. (2020). Trajectory patterns of academic engagement among elementary school students: The implicit theory of intelligence and academic self-efficacy matters. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 618–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12320
Derechos de autor 2024 Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia (España)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2024
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
