Versión reducida de la Escala de Autoevaluación del Desempeño en el Trabajo

Autores/as

  • Érika Guimarães Soares de Azevedo Andrade Universidade Salgado de Oliveira (Universo) (Brasil)
  • Fabiana Queiroga Centro Universitário de Brasília
  • Valentini Valentini Universidade São Francisco (USF) (Brasil)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.402661
Palabras clave: Desempeño en el trabajo, Autoevaluación de rendimiento, Direccionamiento de respuesta

Resumen

Este artículo tiene como objetivo reducir la Escala de autoevaluación de Desempeño en el trabajo, como también controlar el direccionamiento de respuesta y aprobación, utilizando la técnica de viñetas y elementos invertidos. Para la reducción de la escala, se utilizó el banco de datos de la escala original, compuesta por 20 elementos divididos en dos factores: tarea y contexto. Para la reducción, fueron elegidos los 10 elementos con mayores cargas factoriales y thresholds. La escala reducida fue estimada por un factor general y dos dimensiones específicas: Tarea y contexto, representando un modelo bifactor, con indicadores de ajustes adecuados (RMSEA = 0,05; TLI = 0,98). Para controlar el direccionamiento de respuesta y aprobación, fue realizada una colecta de datos, en la cual las respuestas fueron recodificadas y realizados análisis factoriales con la finalidad de realizar una comparación de los resultados con y sin la utilización de viñetas y elementos invertidos. Los resultados apuntaron a que las viñetas mejoraron las cargas factoriales de los análisis, y que los elementos invertidos no tuvieron mejores resultados además de las viñetas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Minor, I., Novicevic, M. M., & Frink, D. D. (2011). The prediction of task and contextual performance by political skill: A meta-analysis and moderator test [Article]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 563-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.02.006

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3

Bowling, N. A., Khazon, S., Meyer, R. D., & Burrus, C. J. (2015). Situational Strength as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analytic Examina-tion. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9340-7

Brandão, H. P., Borges-Andrade, J. E., & Guimarães, T. d. A. (2012). Desempenho organizacional e suas relações com competências gerenciais, suporte organizacional e treinamento [Organizational performance and its relations with management competencies, organizational support and training]. Revista de Administração (São Paulo), 47, 523-539. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1056

Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.com.br/books?id=8vHqQH5VxBIC

Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 687-732). Consulting Psychologists Press.

Campbell, J. P. (2012). Behavior, performance, and effectiveness in the twenty-first century. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 159-194). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928309.013.0006

Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The Modeling and Assessment of Work Performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47-74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427

Coelho Junior, F. A., & Borges-Andrade, J. E. (2011). Efeitos de variáveis individuais e contextuais sobre desempenho individual no trabalho [Effects of individual and contextual variables on individual job performance]. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 16, 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-294X2011000200001

Danner, D., Aichholzer, J., & Rammstedt, B. (2015). Acquiescence in personality questionnaires: Relevance, domain specificity, and stability. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.05.004

Edwards, B. D., Bell, S. T., Arthur, W., & Decuir, A. D. (2008). Relationships between facets of job satisfaction and task and contextual performance. Applied Psychology-an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 57, 441-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00328.x

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.3.4.424

Huang, W.-R., & Su, C.-H. (2016). The mediating role of job satisfaction in the relationship between job training satisfaction and turnover intentions. Industrial and Commercial Training, 48(1), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-04-2015-0029

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. (pp. 3-90). Jossey-Bass.

Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Coffman, D. L. (2006). Random intercept item factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 11(4), 344-362. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.344

Obeidat Shatha, M., Mitchell, R., & Bray, M. (2016). The link between high performance work practices and organizational performance: Empirically validating the conceptualization of HPWP according to the AMO model. Employee Relations, 38(4), 578-595. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-08-2015-0163

Paula, A. P. V. d., & Queiroga, F. (2015). Satisfação no trabalho e clima organizacional: a relação com autoavaliações de desempenho [Job satisfaction and organizational climate; the relation with performance self-assessment]. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 15, 362-373. https://doi.org/10.17652/rpot/2015.4.478

Primi, R., da Silva, I. C. R., Rodrigues, P., Muniz, M., & Almeida, L. S. (2013). The use of the bi-factor model to test the uni-dimensionality of a battery of reasoning tests. Psicothema, 25(1), 115-122. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-02569-019

Primi, R., Zanon, C., Santos, D., Fruyt, F. D., & John, O. P. (2016). Anchoring Vignettes: Can They Make Adolescent Self-Reports of Social-Emotional Skills More Reliable, Discriminant, and Criterion-Valid? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000336

Queiroga, F. (2009). Seleção de pessoas e desempenho no trabalho: Um estudo sobre a validade preditiva dos testes de conhecimentos [Staff selection and job performance: A study on the predictive validity of knowledge tests] [Doutorado Tese, Unb]. Brasília. http://repositorio.unb.br/bitstream/10482/8437/1/2009_FabianaQueiroga.pdf

Queiroga, F., Borges-Andrade, J. E., & Coelho Junior, F. A. (2015). Desempenho no trabalho: Escala de avaliação geral por meio de autopercepções [Job performance: General assessment scale through self-perceptions]. In K. Puente-Palacios & A. d. L. A. Peixoto (Eds.), Ferramentas de diagnóstico para organizações e trabalho: Um olhar a partir da psicologia [Diagnostic tools for organizations and work: A psychological perspective]. Artmed Editora.

Rammstedt, B., & Farmer, R. F. (2013). The Impact of Acquiescence on the Evaluation of Personality Structure. Psychological assessment, 25(4), 1137-1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033323

Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2002). Performance concepts and performance theory. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of Individual performance. Wiley.

Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 718-737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718

Ten Berge, J. M. F. (1999). A legitimate case of component analysis of ipsative measures, and partialling the mean as an alternative to ipsatization. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3401_4

Valentini, F., & Damásio, B. F. (2016). Variância Média Extraída e Confiabilidade Composta: Indicadores de Precisão [Average Variance Extracted and Composite Reliability: Reliabili-ty Coefficients]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa [Psychology: Theory and Research], 32, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-3772e322225

Warr, P., & Nielsen, K. (2018). Wellbeing and work performance. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers. https://doi.org/nobascholar.com

Publicado
05-08-2020
Cómo citar
Andrade, Érika G. S. de A., Queiroga, F., & Valentini, F. (2020). Versión reducida de la Escala de Autoevaluación del Desempeño en el Trabajo. Anales De Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 36(3), 543-552. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.402661
Número
Sección
Psicología social y de las organizaciones