“New Natures” in post-industrial landscapes: Visual strategies of reflecting extractivist modes of production in politics and everyday life

This is an outdated version published on 10-12-2023. Read the most recent version.

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/rmu.518221
Keywords: Industrial nature, symbolic transformation of extractive landscapes, everyday photography, post-industrialization, Instagram, Ruhr area

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the field of landscape transformations from extractivism to nature spaces, based on the example of the Ruhr region. Through an ethnographic approach, regional Instagram photographers and their published images reflecting structural change in the Ruhr region were studied. Instagram images are understood as media practices embedded in everyday life. In order to include their context of emergence, they are examined using a digital ethnographic approach in combination with photo elicitations, go-along interviews, as well as document and image analyses. The analysis of everyday image production shows how the understanding of nature as leisure space and enchanted, romantic landscape scenery becomes a new economic resource for the region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Althusser, L. (1969). Ideologie und ideologische Staatsapparate. Anmerkungen für eine Untersuchung. En L. Althusser (ed.), Ideologie und ideologische Staatsapparate: Aufsätze zur marxistischen Theorie, 108-168. Hamburg: VSA.

Denning, M. (2007). Representing Global Labour. Social Text, 25/3, 125-145.

Dooling, S. (2009). Ecological gentrification: A research agenda exploring justice in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33/3, 621-639.

Ehses, B. (2010). Industrienatur: wilde Schönheit, stille Schlote. En Regionalverband Ruhr (ed.), Unter freiem Himmel. Emscher Landschaftspark, 162-179. Basel: Birkhäuser.

Färber, A. (2019). How does ANT help us to rethink the city and its promises? En A. Blok, I. Farías & C. Roberts (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory, 264-272. London: Routledge.

Fischer, L. (2012). Landschaft – überall und nirgends? En S. Krebs & M. Seifert (eds.), Landschaft quer denken. Theorien – Bilder – Formationen, 23-36. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.

Gerndt, H. (2001). Naturmythen. Traditionales Naturverständnis und mod- ernes Umweltbewußtsein. En R. W. Brednich, A. Schneider & U. Werner (eds.), Natur - Kultur. Volkskundliche Perspektiven auf Mensch und Umwelt. 32. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Volkskunde in Halle vom 27.9. bis 1.10.1999, 57-75. Münster: Waxmann.

Hagerman, C. (2007). Shaping neighbourhoods and nature: Urban political ecologies of urban waterfront transformations in Portland, Oregon. Cities, 24, 285-297.

Hall, S. (2016): Cultural Studies 1983. A theoretical history. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble. Durham: Duke University Press.

Huszka, V. (2021). Zwischen Innen und Aussen. Der Regionenvergleich als alltagsweltliche Skalierungspraxis. Hamburger Journal für Kulturanthropologie (HJK), 13, 271-279.

Jansson, A. (2018). Rethinking post-tourism in the age of social media. Annals of Tourism Research, 69, 101-110.

Jessop, B. (2010). Cultural political economy and critical policy studies. Critical policy studies, 3.3-4, 336-356.

Jessop, B. (2013). Kulturelle Politische Ökonomie, räumliche Vorstellungswelten und regionale ökonomische Dynamiken. En O. Brand, S. Dörhöfer & P. Eser (eds.), Die konflikthafte Konstitution der Region. Kultur, Politik, Ökonomie, 42-73. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.

Jessop, B. & Oosterlynck, S. (2008). Cultural political economy: On making the cultural turn without falling into soft economic sociology. Geoforum, 39/3, 1155-1169.

Jurgenson, N. (2019). The social photo: On photography and social media. London: Verso.

Lehmuskallio, A. y Crúz, E. G., (2016). Digital photography and everyday life. London: Routledge.

Lindner, R. (1994). Das Ethos der Region. En R. Lindner (ed.), Die Wiederkehr des Regionalen. Über neue Formen kultureller Identität, 201- 231. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

McClintock, N. (2018). Cultivating (a) Sustainability Capital: Urban Agriculture, Eco-gentrification, and the Uneven Valorization of Social Reproduction. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108/2, 579-590.

Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography. London: SAGE.

Pink, S. (2011). Sensory digital photography: re-thinking ‘moving’ and the image. Visual Studies, 26(1), 4-13.

Prossek, A (2009). Bild-Raum Ruhrgebiet. zur symbolischen Produktion der Region. Detmold: Rohn.

Quastel, N. (2009). Political Ecologies of Gentrification. Urban Geography, 30/7, 694-725.

Reckwitz, A. (2019). Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Zum Strukturwandel der Moderne, Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Siemer, S. & Stottrop, U. (2010). Burggrafen, Stahlbarone und Freizeitkönige. En Regionalverband Ruhr (ed.), Unter freiem Himmel. Emscher Landschaftspark, 52-59. Basel: Birkhäuser.

von Redecker, E. (2020). Revolution für das Leben: Philosophie der neuen Protestformen. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer Verlag.

Wietschorke, J. (2010). Von der Industriekultur zur Kulturindustrie? Historische Identität und regionale Repräsentation im Ruhrgebiet. Rheinisch-westfälische Zeitschrift für Volkskunde, 55, 23-46.

Published
10-12-2023
Versions
How to Cite
Huszka, V. (2023). “New Natures” in post-industrial landscapes: Visual strategies of reflecting extractivist modes of production in politics and everyday life . Murcian Journal of Anthropology, (30), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.6018/rmu.518221