The Digital Teaching Competence, a systematic review of the most commonly used models
Abstract
Due to the current interest in the Teacher Digital Competence (TDC), both from the social and education fields, this article shows its state-of-art, in order to find out how the work on these skills is going both theoretically and empirically. Thus, we compile different models that stand out as training guides that facilitate TDC's development. We analyze different countries and institutions for this study, as well as their characteristics and purposes. For each model, we highlight research results that the models are based on to facilitate gaining TDC skills. We analyze how the educational community evaluates them and their results after their implementation in educational policy. We reveal that each TDC model implies a great burden of responsibility for institutions and educators. In order to be able to respond to the social and educational requirements raised at all levels of training, all models strongly rely on the educational community to gain digital competence.
Downloads
References
Aguirre, J.C., & Jaramillo, L.G. (2015). El papel de la descripción en la investigación cualitativa. Cinta de moebio, 53, 175-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2015000200006
Alonso-Ferreiro, A. (2018). Aprendizaje basado en proyectos para el desarrollo de la competencia digital docente en la formación inicial del profesorado. Relatec: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 17(1), 9-24. https://bit.ly/3cWfYYD
Ascencio, P.B., Garay, M.F., & Seguic, E. (2016). Formación inicial docente (FID) y tecnologías de la información y comunicación (TIC) en la Universidad de Magallanes–Patagonia Chilena. Digital Education Review, 30, 123-134. https://bit.ly/3ta9WJT
Ballesta, J., Martínez, J., & Céspedes, R. (2017). Un modelo integrador para la alfabetización mediática y la competencia digital en Educación Primaria. Revista Fuentes, 19(2), 139-154. https://bit.ly/3cSK7Iq
Banister, S., & Vannata, R.V. (2014). Assessing NETS • T Performance in Teacher Candidates. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2012.10784705
Baxa, J., & Christ, T. (2018). The DigiLit framework. The Reading Teacher, 71(6), 703-714. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1660
Biel, L.A., & Álvarez, E. (2019). La competencia digital docente del profesor universitario 3.0. Caracteres: estudios culturales y críticos de la esfera digital, 8(2), 205-236. https://bit.ly/3uvf8Il
Bilbao, A., & Salinas, A. (2010). El libro abierto de la informática educativa. Enlaces. https://bit.ly/3fPWqHw
Cantón, I., Cañón, R., & Grande, M. (2017). La comunicación como subdimensión de la competencia digital en futuros maestro de primaria. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 50, 33-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2017.i50.02
Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1. The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. European Commision. https://bit.ly/31W9seh
Castañeda, L., Esteve, F., & Adell, J. (2018). ¿Por qué es necesario repensar la competencia docente para el mundo digital?. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red/56/6
Claro, M., & Jara, I. (2020). The end of Enlaces: 25 years of an ICT education policy in Chile. Digital Education Review, 37, 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.96-108
Comisión Europea (2016). DigCompOrg. Digitally Competent Educational Organisations. https://bit.ly/3cXruDm
Durán, M., Prendes, M.P., & Guriérrez, I. (2019). Certificación de la Competencia Digital Docente: propuesta para el profesorado universitario. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1), 187-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.22069
Enlaces. (2011). Competencias y Estándares TIC para la Profesión Docente. https://bit.ly/3sX5v4T
Esteve, F.M. (2015). La competencia digital docente: análisis de la autopercepción y evaluación del desempeño de los estudiantes universitarios de educación por medio de un entorno 3D [Tesis Doctoral, Universitat Rovira i Virgili]. https://bit.ly/3fQusLA
Esteve-Mon, F.M., Castañeda, L., & Adell-Segura, J. (2018). Un modelo holístico de competencia docente para el mundo digital. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 91, 105-116. https://bit.ly/3uvwvZK
Esteve, F.M., Gisbert, M., & Lázaro, J.L. (2016a). La Competencia Digital de los futuros docentes: ¿Cómo se ven los actuales estudiantes de educación?. Perspectiva Educacional, Formación de Profesores, 55(2), 38-54. https://bit.ly/3uslYOO
Esteve, F., Cela, J.M., & Gisbert, M. (2016b). ETeach3D: Designing a 3D Virtual Environment for Evaluating the Digital Competence of Preservice Teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(6), 816-839. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0735633116637191
Falcó, J.M. (2017). Evaluación de la competencia digital docente en la comunidad autónoma de Aragón. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 19(4), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2017.19.4.1359
Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital com- petence in Europe. IPTS. European Comission. https://bit.ly/3s5Injz
Fraser, J., Atkins, L., & Hall, R. (2013). DigiLit Leicester. Supporting teachers, promoting digital literacy, transforming learning. Leicester City Council. https://bit.ly/3wv0UJv
Garcia i Grau, F., Lázaro-Cantabrana, J.L., & Valls-Bautista, C. (2020). Avanzando hacia la madurez digital del centro educativo: un análisis de la competencia digital docente. En E. Sánchez, E. Colomo, J. Ruiz y J. Sánchez (Eds.), Tecnologías educativas y estrategias didácticas (pp. 188-199). Universidad de Málaga. https://bit.ly/2PzK2AI
Girón, V., Cózar, R., & González, J.A. (2019). Análisis de la autopercepción sobre el nivel de competencia digital docente en la formación inicial de maestros/as. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 22(3), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.373421
Gisbert, M., & Esteve, F. (2016). Digital Leaners: la competencia digital de los estudiantes universitarios. La cuestión universitaria, 7, 48-59. https://bit.ly/39NtM5G
Guillén-Gámez, F.D., Álvarez-García, F.J., & Rodríguez, I.M. (2018). Digital tablets in the music classroom: A study about the academic performance of students in the BYOD context. Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 11(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.11.2.171_1
Hall, R., Atkins, L., & Fraser, J. (2014). Defining a self-evaluation digital literacy framework for secondary educators: the DigiLit Leicester project. Research in Learning Technology, 22. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.21440
Ibáñez-Etxeberria, A., Kortabitarte, A., De Castro, P., & Gillate, I. (2019). Competencia digital mediante apps de temática patrimonial en el marco DigComp. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 22(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/reifop.22.1.356231
INTEF (2017a). Marco Común de Competencia Digital Docente. Ministerio de Educación Cultura y Deporte. https://bit.ly/2RdzMOW
INTEF (2017b). Portfolio de la Competencia Digital Docente. Ministerio de Educación Cultura y Deporte. https://bit.ly/39NvF2g
ISTE (2008). National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers. International Society for Technology in Education.
ISTE. (2017). ISTE Standards for Educators. International Society for Technology in Education.
Jiménez-Hernández, D., González-Calatayud, V., Torres-Soto, A., Martínez, A. & Morales, J. (2020). Digital Competence of Future Secondary School Teachers: Differences According to Gender, Age, and Branch of Knowledge. Sustainability, 12(22), 9473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229473
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33, 1-26. https://bit.ly/3fLqvYF
Krumsvik, R. (2011). Digital competence in Norwegian teacher education and schools. Högre utbildning, 1(1), 39-51. https://bit.ly/3uv3ayt
Kumar, S., & Vigil, K. (2014). The Net Generation as Preservice Teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784671
Lázaro, J.L. & Gisbert, M.G. (2015a). El desarrollo de la competencia digital docente a partir de una experiencia piloto de formación en alternancia en el Grado de Educación. Educar, 51(2), 321-348. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.725
Lázaro, J.L., & Gisbert, M.G. (2015b). Elaboració d’una rúbrica per avaluar la competència digital del docent. Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista de Ciències de l’Educació, 1(1), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2015.1.648
Lázaro, J.L., Usart, M., & Gisbert, M. (2019). Assessing Teacher Digital Compe¬tence: the Construction of an Instrument for Measuring the Knowledge of Pre-Service Teachers. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(1), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.370
Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la Mejora de la Calidad Educativa (LOMCE), Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) 2013, de 10 de diciembre, 1-64. https://bit.ly/3mp6QPz
Morphew, V.N. (2012). A Constructivist Approach to the National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
Muñoz, P. (2016). Estrategias descolonizadoras en competencias culturales para la formación de educadores. Opción, 32(12), 66-84. https://bit.ly/3ut0XUb
Pérez, A., & Rodríguez, M.J. (2016). Evaluación de las competencias digitales autopercibidas del profesorado de educación primaria en Castilla y León. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 34 (2), 399-415. http://doi.org/10.6018/rie.34.2.215121
Pike, K.L. (1967). Etic and emic standpoints for the description of behavior. En K.L. Pike, Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior (pp. 37–72). Mouton & Co. https://doi.org/10.1037/14786-002
Prendes, M.P., Román, M., & González-Calatayud, V. (2021). Modelo integral de análisis de la competencia digital en las instituciones de enseñanza superior: profesorado y estudiantes en el contexto organizativo. Revista Panorâmica, 32. https://bit.ly/3dzCO7q
Resolución de 2 de julio de 2020, de la Dirección General de Evaluación y Cooperación Territorial, por la que se publica el Acuerdo de la Conferencia Sectorial de Educación sobre el marco de referencia de la competencia digital docente. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 191, sec. III, de 13 de julio de 2020, 50639-50668. https://bit.ly/3t1dMog
Rodrigo. M. (2001). Teorías de la comunicación: ámbitos, métodos y perspectivas. Bellaterra.
Silva, J., Miranda, P., Gisbert, M., Morales, M., & Onetto, A. (2016). Indicadores para evaluar la competencia digital docente en la formación inicial en el contexto Chileno – Uruguayo. RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 15(3), 55-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.15.3.55
Torrey Trust (2018) 2017 ISTE Standards for Educators: From Teaching With Technology to Using Technology to Empower Learners, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1398980
UNESCO (2008). Estándares de competencias en TIC para docentes. https://bit.ly/31Uqj16
UNESCO (2011). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Valdivieso, T.S., & Gonzáles, M.Á. (2016). Competencia digital docente: ¿Dónde estamos?. Perfil del docente de educación primaria y secundaria. El caso de Ecuador. Pixel-Bit: Revista de Medios y Educación, 49, 57-73. https://bit.ly/3wBwV2w
Copyright (c) 2021 David Jiménez Hernández, Práxedes Muñoz Sánchez, Fulgencio S. Sánchez Giménez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms:
a. The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License. Non-commercial attribution 4.0 International that allows to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt, remix, transform and build on the material in the following terms:
Recognition - You must give the appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in a way that suggests that the licensor or its use endorses it. Non-commercial - You cannot use the material for commercial purposes. Share under it - If you remix, transform, or create on the material, your contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published work (e.g. deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) whenever the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to distribute their work through the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
d. In any case, the Editorial Team understands that the opinions expressed by the authors are their exclusive responsibility.