Why those who promote “life-long learning” get only partial credit

Authors

  • Marc Prensky The Global Future Education Foundation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.458191
Keywords: Life-long learning, learning, accomplishment

Abstract

Many currently promote a new need for Life-Long Learning in the future distinguishing it from the older model of learn once and then work. We argue that while life-long learning may indeed happen for many, it is not a useful goal. A far better goal is Life-Long Accomplishment, since, outside of academia, humans learn in order to accomplish. Too many assume that if people learn things, accomplishment will automatically follow, but this is false. Although learning new things is certainly a piece of what is needed in a changing world, it is far better to focus people on why, for instance, what do they want to accomplish?  Focusing on the continuation of learning throughout life, and not on the accomplishments it leads to is, in many cases, self-serving for those who see themselves in the learning business. Life-Long Learning leaves unasked and unanswered the question of to what end. The world does not need life-long learners, however the world needs people who can get things done and learn whatever they need as they do. Focusing people only (or even primarily) on the goal of learning gives a false idea of what is truly needed for in the 21st century, and therefore deserves only partial credit as a useful solution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Prensky, M. (2015). El mundo necesita un nuevo currículo. Ediciones SM.

Prensky, M. (2011). Enseñar a nativos digitales. Una propuesta pedagógica para la sociedad del conocimiento. Ediciones SM.

Published
01-12-2020
How to Cite
Prensky, M. (2020). Why those who promote “life-long learning” get only partial credit. RiiTE Interuniversity Journal of Research in Educational Technology, (9). https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.458191
Issue
Section
EDITORIAL