La investigación en Tecnología Educativa y las nuevas ecologías del aprendizaje: Design-Based Research (DBR) como enfoque metodológico
Supporting Agencies
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad – Proyectos I D
- del Programa Estatal de Fomento de la Investigación científica y técnica de excelencia
- Subprograma Estatal de Generación del Conocimiento
Abstract
La investigación en Tecnología Educativa ha experimentado un amplio crecimiento en las últimas décadas. Este desarrollo no ha tenido una influencia significativa en la práctica educativa. La integración de las tecnologías digitales en los sistemas educativos no ha modificado sustancialmente la metodología docente para adaptarse a las competencias del siglo XXI. La investigación educativa tiene un escaso impacto en la toma de decisiones de los profesionales de la educación. Por otra parte, las nuevas ecologías del aprendizaje nos sitúan ante contextos de enseñanza-aprendizaje más flexibles, abiertos, distribuidos y conectados. Se necesitan nuevas teorías del conocimiento y nuevos enfoques en las metodologías de investigación educativa. En este artículo el «aprendizaje trialógico» se identifica como un marco conceptual útil para la comprensión de los nuevos contextos educativos y el «Design-Based Research» (DBR) se describe como un modelo metodológico idóneo para la integración efectiva de la investigación en la teoría y práctica pedagógica.Downloads
References
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Transformational Play Using Games to Position Person, Content, and Context. Educational Researcher, 39(7), 525-536. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10386593
Barab, S.A., & Squire, K. (2004). Introduction: Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
Baydas, O., Kucuk, S., Yilmaz, R. M., Aydemir, M., & Goktas, Y. (2015). Educational technology research trends from 2002 to 2014. Scientometrics, 105(1), 709-725. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1693-4
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., … Huang, B. (2004). How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439. http://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2009). Design for Scalability: A Case Study of the River City Curriculum. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 353-365. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9156-4
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design Experiments in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a Design Science of Education. En E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New Directions in Educational Technology (pp. 15-22). Berlin: Springer.
Cuban, L. (2003). Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30(2), 116-127. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0076829
Edelson, D. C. (2006). Balancing innovation and risk. En J. J. H. van den Akker (Ed.), Educational design research (pp. 100-106). London: Routledge.
Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific Culture and Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4-14. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008004
Glass, G. V., & Moore, N. (1989). Research and practice: Universities and schools. Presentado en Second Annual Meeting of the Arizona Educational Research Organization. Recuperado a partir de http://www.gvglass.info/papers/research-practice.pdf
Hakkarainen, K. (2008). Toward a trialogical approach to learning: Personal reflections. LLine-Lifelong Learning in Europe, (13), 22-29.
Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2009). Toward a trialogical approach to learning. En B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 65-80). London ; New York: Routledge.
Hsu, Y.-C., Hung, J.-L., & Ching, Y.-H. (2013). Trends of educational technology research: more than a decade of international research in six SSCI-indexed refereed journals. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 685-705. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9290-9
Kelly, A. E. (2006). Quality criteria for design research. Evidences and commitments. En J. J. H. van den Akker (Ed.), Educational design research (pp. 107-118). London: Routledge.
Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., & Baek, J. Y. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education: innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. New York : London: Routledge.
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic Review of Design-Based Research Progress: Is a Little Knowledge a Dangerous Thing? Educational Researcher, 42(2), 97-100. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463781
Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., Muukkonen, H., Kosonen, K., & Karlgren, K. (2011). The roles and uses of design principles for developing the trialogical approach on learning. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 233-246. http://doi.org/10.1080/21567069.2011.624171
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. M. (2010). An introduction to educational design research. Enschede: SLO - Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development. Recuperado a partir de http://www.slo.nl/downloads/2009/Introduction_20to_20education_20design_20research.pdf
Romero-Ariza, M. (2014). Uniendo investigación, política y práctica educativas: DBR, desafíos y oportunidades. Magis. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 7(14), 159. http://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.M7-14.UIPP
Reeves, T. C. (1995). Questioning the Questions of Instructional Technology Research. Presentado en Annual National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT). Recuperado a partir de http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED383331
Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. En J. J. H. van den Akker (Ed.), Educational design research (pp. 52-66). London: Routledge.
Sáez-López, J.-M., Román-González, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using «Scratch» in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129-141. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003
Serrano Sánchez, J. L., y Prendes Espinosa, M. P. (2015). Integración de TIC en aulas hospitalarias como recursos para la mejora de los procesos educativos. ESE : Estudios sobre educación, (28), 187-210. http://doi.org/10.15581/004.28.187-210
Serrano Sánchez, J. L., y Prendes Espinosa, M. P. (2014). TIC para la mejora educativa en aulas hospitalarias. Pixel-Bit: Revista de medios y educación, (45), 23-36. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2014.i45.02
Shattuck, J., & Anderson, T. (2013). Using a design-based research study to identify principles for training instructors to teach online. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5). Recuperado a partir de http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1626
Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15-21. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007015
van den Akker, J.J.H., Branch, R. M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (1999). Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Dordrecht: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7
van den Akker, J. J. H. (Ed.). (2006). Educational design research. London: Routledge.
Wang, S.-K., Hsu, H.-Y., Reeves, T. C., & Coster, D. C. (2014). Professional development to enhance teachers’ practices in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) as cognitive tools: Lessons learned from a design-based research study. Computers & Education, 79, 101-115. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.006
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms:
a. The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License. Non-commercial attribution 4.0 International that allows to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt, remix, transform and build on the material in the following terms:
Recognition - You must give the appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in a way that suggests that the licensor or its use endorses it. Non-commercial - You cannot use the material for commercial purposes. Share under it - If you remix, transform, or create on the material, your contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published work (e.g. deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) whenever the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to distribute their work through the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
d. In any case, the Editorial Team understands that the opinions expressed by the authors are their exclusive responsibility.
