¿Están las habilidades blandas de los médicos adecuadamente respaldadas por los planes de estudio de medicina? Un estudio sobre las facultades de Medicina en Turquía.
Resumen
El objetivo de este estudio es analizar en qué medida se incluyen las competencias sociales, un elemento importante que complementa las competencias técnicas de los médicos, en los planes de estudio de las facultades de medicina de Turquía. Para ello, se consultaron los sitios web de todas las facultades y se examinaron los planes de estudios del curso académico 2023-2024 utilizando el método de análisis de contenido. Basándose en las categorías de habilidades blandas identificadas por el Ministerio de Educación Superior de Malasia, se analizó si estos cursos se incluían en los planes de estudio, en qué categorías se ofrecían y en qué periodo de la formación médica se impartían. Se constató que todas las facultades de medicina objeto del estudio contaban con cursos de habilidades blandas, ya fueran optativos u obligatorios. Sin embargo, el 12,3 % de las universidades no incluía un curso obligatorio de habilidades blandas en su plan de estudios. Mientras que el 83 % de las universidades concentraba los cursos de habilidades blandas únicamente en los tres primeros años de la formación médica, el porcentaje de facultades que distribuía estos cursos a lo largo de todo el periodo de formación, incluidos los tres últimos años, era solo del 2,3 %. Al examinar la distribución de los cursos por categoría, se observó que los cursos de «Comunicación» eran los más comunes, seguidos de los de «Ética» y «Aprendizaje permanente y tecnologías de la información». Se constató que los cursos de las categorías «Pensamiento crítico y resolución de problemas», «Liderazgo» y «Trabajo en equipo» estaban significativamente infrarrepresentados. Se recomienda diseñar los planes de estudios de las facultades de medicina de manera que incluyan todas las categorías de competencias no técnicas y que estas se distribuyan de forma sistemática a lo largo de todo el proceso educativo.
Descargas
-
Resumen0
-
pdf 0
-
xml 0
Citas
1. Solet DJ, Norvell JM, Rutan GH, Frankel RM. Lost in translation: challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs. Academic Medicine. 2005, 80 (12). 1094-1099. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200512000-00005.
2. Dolev N, Naamati-Schneider L, Meirovich A. Making Soft Skills a Part of the Curriculum of Healthcare Studies. In: M. S. Firstenberg, & S. P. Stawicki (Eds.). Medical Education for the 21st Century. IntechOpen. 2021. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98671
3. Dunn SA, Markoff B. Physician-physician communiation: What is the hang-up? Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2009, 24 (3). 437-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-0913-0
4. Shannon D. Effective Physician-to-Physician Communication: An Essential Ingredient for Care Coordination. Physician Executive. 2012, 38 (1). 16-21.
5. Ersoy LV. Tıbbi Malpraktis. Bulletin of Thoracic Surgery/Toraks Cerrahisi Bülteni. 2014, 5 (1). 29-32. https://doi.org/10.5152/tcb.2014.004
6. Karatas M, Yakıncı C. Tıbbi Hata Nedenleri ve Çözüm Yolları . Journal of Turgut Ozal Medical Center. 2010, 17 (3). 233-236.
7. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M. & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds). To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press. 2000. https://doi.org/10.17226/9728
8. Leape LL, Lawthers AG, Brennan TA, Johnson WG. Preventing medical injury. Quality Review Bulletin. 1993, 19 (5). 144-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30608-x
9. Steward MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1995, 152 (9). 1423-1433.
10. Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 2002, 15 (1). 25-38.
11. Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Social Science and Medicine. 1995, 40 (7). 903-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-m.
12. Zolnierek KBH, DiMatteo MR. Physician Communication and Patient Adherence to Treatment: A Meta-Analysis. Medical Care. 2009, 47 (8). 826–834.
13. Reader TW, Gillespie A, Roberts, J. Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2014, 23 (8). 678-689. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437
14. Mazor KM, Reed GW, Yood RA, et al. Disclosure of medical errors: what factors influence how patients respond? Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2006, 21, 704-710. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00465.x
15. Krakowski AJ. Doctor-doctor relationship. Psychosomatics: Journal of Consultation and Liaison Psychiatry. 1971, 12 (1). 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(71)71560-6
16. Garelick A. Fagin L. Doctor to doctor: getting on with colleagues. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. 2004, 10, 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.10.3.225
17. Abraham TH, Stewart G. Solimeo S. The importance of soft skills development in a hard data world: learning from interviews with healthcare leaders. BMC Medical Education. 2021, 21 (147). 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02567-1.
18. Murphy H. Elsevier Education. https://evolve.elsevier.com/education/expertise/faculty-development/the-importance-of-soft-skills-in-healthcare-professions-2/ . Accessed June 2024.
19. Baykan Z, Naçar M. Tip eğitiminde örtük müfredat öğrencilerin empati düzeylerini etkilemekte midir? Longitudinal bir çalişma. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2017, 10 (2). 775-784. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.327003
20. Igde FA, Sahin MK. Changes in empathy during medical education: An example from Turkiye. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017, 33 (5). 1177-1181. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.335.13074
21. Shariat SV, Habibi M. Empathy in Iranian medical students: measurement model of the Jefferson scale of empathy. Medical Teacher. 2013, 35 (1). 913-918. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.714881
22. Chen DC, Kirshenbaum DS, Yan J, et.al. Characterizing changes in student empathy throughout medical school. Medical Teacher. 2012, 34 (4) 305-311. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.644600
23. Duarte MI, Branco MC, Raposo ML, Rodrigues PJ. Empathy in medical students as related to gender, year of medical school and specialty interest. South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education. 2015, 9 (1). 50-53. https://doi.org/10.4038/seajme.v9i1.97
24. Quince TA, Parker RA, Wood DF, Benson JA. Stability of empathy among undergraduate medical students: A longitudinal study at one UK medical school. BMC Medical Education. 2011, 11 (90). 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-90
25. Baykan Z, Naçar M, Demirel SÖ. Evaluation of empathic skills and tendencies of medical students. Academic Psychiatry. 2011, 35, 207–208. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.35.3.207
26. Van Staden CW, Joubert PM, Pickworth GE, et al. The conceptualisation of soft skills among medical students before and after curriculum reform. South African Psychiatry Review. 2006, 9, 33-37.
27. Lowther MW, McMillan WJ, Venter F. Education for actuarial quality must develop more than technical competence. South African Actuarial Journal. 2009, 9, 53–73. https://doi.org/10.4314/SAAJ.V9l1.46819
28. Abu Kasim NH, Abu Kassim NL, Razak AA, et al. Pairing as an instructional strategy to promote soft skills amongst clinical dental students. European journal of dental education: official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe. 2014, 18 (1) 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12058
29. Ministry of Higher Education. Module for development of soft skills for higher learning institutions in Malaysia, 2nd edn. Serdang Universiti Putra Malaysia; 2006.
30. TUIK. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Dunya-Nufus-Gunu-2023-49688#: :text=T%C3%BCrkiye%2C%2085%20milyon%20279%20bin,1%2C1'ini%20olu%C5%9Fturdu. Accessed November 15, 2024
31. Ministry of Health. Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2021 Haber Bülteni. 2022. https://www.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/44131/0/saglik-istatistikleri-yilligi-2021-haber-bultenipdf.pdf?_tag1=CEC095C58B83C4D20D904937CD3F4DD544B2DA0B. Accessed 11 May 2024.
32. Sag I, Zengul FD. Why medical tourists choose Turkiye as a medical tourism destination? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights. 2019, 2 (3). 296-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-05-2018-0031
33. https://www.ushas.com.tr/saglik-turizmi-verileri/ .Accessed 10 October 2024.
34. Bulut A, Şengül H. Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Sağlık Turizmi. Yönetim, Ekonomi ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2019. 3 (1). 45-62. https://doi.org/10.29226/TR1001.2019.104
35. TTB. Artan Tıp Fakülteleri Kontenjanı ve Önerilerimiz. 2023. https://www.ttb.org.tr/haber_goster.php?Guid=42ba715e-3ffe-11ee-889b-1b907fcd8532 Accessed 15 May 2024.
36. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations https://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/who-we-are/accredited-organizations/#sort=%40aoname%20ascending&numberOfResults=50&f:@aocountry=[Turkiye]. Accessed 2 September 2024.
37. Medical Tourism Medical tourism index 2020–2021. MedicalTourism.com. 2021. https://www.medicaltourism.com/mti/home . Accessed 15 May 2024.
38. WTO World Trade Organization & World Bank. Statistics. 2021. https://i-tip.wto.org/services/default.aspx . Accessed 29 April 2024.
39. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2023/subject-ranking/clinical-pre-clinical-health#!/length/25/locations/TUR/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats . Accessed 25 May 2024.
40. Top Universities. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2023/medicine?countries=tr . Accessed 25 May 2024.
41. US News. https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/Turkiye/clinical-medicine . Accessed 25 May 2024.
42. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis. In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth, & L. Gross (Eds.). InterNational Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford University Press. 1989.
43. Suri H, Clarke D. Advancements in research systhesis methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective. Review of Educational Research. 2009. 79 (1). 395-430. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326349
44. Nagy, T., Fritúz, G., Gál, J. et al. Teaching nontechnical skills in the undergraduate education of health care professionals: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Hungary. BMC Med Educ. 2024. 174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05164-0
45. Evans, M. A., James, E. J., Misa M. Leadership Training in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Medical Students. 2023. 11 (1). 58–66. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2023.1717
46. Nicolaou, N., Nicolaou, C., Nicolaou, P. et al. Development of a leadership and management module for the undergraduate medical curriculum. BMC Med Educ. 2024. 1310 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06004-x
47. Griewatz, J., Yousef, A., Rothdiener, M. et al. Are we preparing for collaboration, advocacy and leadership? Targeted multi-site analysis of collaborative intrinsic roles implementation in medical undergraduate curricula. BMC Med Educ. 2020. 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1940-0
48. Borowczyk, M., Stalmach-Przygoda, A., Doroszewska, A. et al. Developing an effective and comprehensive communication curriculum for undergraduate medical education in Poland – the review and recommendations. BMC Med Educ. 2023, 645. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04533-5
49. Schmidt, C.N., Oji, N.M., Hauer, K.E. et al. Development, implementation, and evaluation of the Student Optimized Learning Environment (SOLE): a longitudinal team-based communication skills curriculum for medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2026, 663. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08988-0
50. Bok, C., Ng, C.H., Koh, J.W.H. et al. Interprofessional communication (IPC) for medical students: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2020, 372. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02296-x
Derechos de autor 2026 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia
2. Las obras se publican bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0.
![]()
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones preprint (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.





This is a Diamond Journal 






