Perception of meaningful learning after the implementation of interactive simulations in the teaching of Physiology.

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.714401
Keywords: Physiology, Simulation, meaningful learning, medical education, blended learning

Abstract

Introduction: Incorporating educational resources into the teaching process of Human Physiology is a key strategy for promoting meaningful learning in medical students. Objective: To evaluate the perception of meaningful learning after the implementation of interactive simulations in the Human Physiology teaching process at the Gambia Medical University. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was conducted. The sample consisted of medical student at The University of The Gambia (n=73). A teaching strategy based on interactive simulations was implemented in a blended learning environment. The Meaningful Learning Perception Scale in Blended Learning was used for data collection. Descriptive statistics was applied, including frequency, percentage, and mean analyses. Results: A high level of acceptance was observed in all dimensions evaluated. The cognitive dimension reached the highest acceptance percentage (95.9%), followed by the social-collaborative (90.3%), procedural one (89.0%), and the attitudinal (89.0%) dimensions. The metacognitive dimension showed the lowest value (84.2%), although still high. Means ranged from 4.23 to 4.46 on a 5-point Likert scale. Conclusions: Interactive simulations are perceived as an effective strategy for promoting meaningful learning in the teaching of Human Physiology, positively impacting the cognitive, procedural, attitudinal, metacognitive, and social dimensions of the study group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    174
  • pdf (Español (España))
    168
  • pdf
    168
  • xml (Español (España))
    18

Author Biographies

Jesús Alberto Avila Leyva, University of Medical Sciences of Holguin

Doctor of Medicine, specialist in Physiology. Professor in the Department of Basic Biomedical Sciences. Assistant Professor

Barbara de la Caridad Teutor Rodriguez, University of Medical Sciences of Villa Clara

Bachelor's degree in English. Professor in the English Department. Assistant Professor

References

1. Casusol A. Del aula tradicional al entorno digital: impacto del blended learning en el proceso educativo. Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología. 2024, 28, 279. https://doi.org/10.47460/uct.v28ispecial.825

2. Galán A. Blended learning en la universidad: denominaciones y modelos. Série Estudos. 2019, 24, 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.20435/serie-estudos.v24i51.1301

3. Quitián S, González J. El diseño de ambientes blended-learning: retos y oportunidades. Educación y Educadores. 2020, 23, 659. https://doi.org/10.5294/edu.2020.23.4.6

4. Clavijo N. Efectividad de la simulación en la formación de profesionales de la salud desde la inserción curricular. Ciencia y Reflexión. 2025, 4, 26. https://cienciayreflexion.com/index.php/cr/article/view/26

5. Gutierrez Y. La Simulación Clínica en el entorno actual del Aprendizaje Virtual como una herramienta de Innovación Docente. Yachay - Revista Científico Cultural. 2020, 9, 563. https://doi.org/10.36881/yachay.v9i01.231

6. Botello J, Rincón A. Tecnología educativa y simulación clínica: mediación epistemológica en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la medicina. Revista Medicina. 2026, 47, 376. https://doi.org/10.56050/RM-47-3-05

7. Vicedo A. Enseñanza de las Ciencias Básicas Biomédicas. Viejas deudas y nuevos retos. Revista Haban Cienc Méd. 2020, 19, 5. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729519X2020000600001&lng=es

8. Betancourt M, Bermejo R, García M, Betancourt K. Análisis histórico de la enseñanza-aprendizaje de las ciencias básicas biomédicas y su integración en Estomatología. Rev Hum Med. 2022, 22, 103. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S172781202022000100103

9. Serrano K, Velecela S, Cabrera M, Chacha A. Uso de simuladores virtuales en la educación médica. Revista de Producción, Ciencias e Investigación CIDEPRO. 2024, 8, 52. https://doi.org/10.29018/issn.2588-1000vol8iss52.2024pp185-223

10. Wu Q, Wang Y. Virtual Simulation in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review of Recent Practice. Healthcare Professions Education. 2022, 9, 85. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.855403

11. Chukwuka E, Dependable C, Okatta A, Amaechi I, Elendu T, Ezeh C, Elendu I. The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Rev. Medicine. 2024, 5, 103. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038813

12. Cordeiro T, Rocha L, Pinto M. Metacognição na simulação clínica: eventos metacognitivos durante o briefing, a prática simulada e o debriefing. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica. 2025, 49, 3. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v49.3-2024-0174.ING

13. Tiller G, Ortiz A. La simulación médica para el desarrollo de habilidades competentes en médicos y residentes médicos quirúrgicos: una revisión de alcance. Rev Chil Anest. 2025, 54, 819. http://dx.doi.org/10.25237/revchilanestv54n6-06

Published
12-06-2026
How to Cite
Avila Leyva, J. A., Vergara Vera, I., & Teutor Rodriguez, B. de la C. (2026). Perception of meaningful learning after the implementation of interactive simulations in the teaching of Physiology. Spanish Journal of Medical Education, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.714401