Formación en telemedicina en la educación médica de pregrado: Una revisión sistemática exploratoria.
Resumen
Introducción: La telemedicina se ha consolidado como una herramienta clave en los sistemas de salud posterior a la pandemia por COVID-19, generando la necesidad de incorporar competencias específicas en la formación médica de pregrado. Sin embargo, su integración curricular es heterogénea y carece de síntesis integradoras. Objetivo: Mapear la literatura publicada entre 2021 y 2026 sobre formación en telemedicina en estudiantes de medicina de pregrado, identificando tipos de intervenciones educativas, competencias abordadas, métodos de evaluación, tendencias y brechas de conocimiento. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática exploratoria siguiendo el marco metodológico de Arksey y O’Malley, las recomendaciones de Levac et al. y las directrices del Joanna Briggs Institute, reportada conforme a PRISMA-ScR. Se efectuó una búsqueda sistemática en PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science y LILACS para el período enero 2021–enero 2026. Se incluyeron estudios empíricos y no empíricos relacionados con formación en telemedicina en educación médica de pregrado. La selección se realizó por revisores independientes. Los datos fueron extraídos mediante una matriz de extracción de datos y sintetizados de forma descriptiva y temática. Resultados: Se incluyeron 35 estudios. La evidencia muestra una integración curricular heterogénea a nivel global, con predominio de estudios provenientes de países de altos ingresos. Las intervenciones educativas se estructuran principalmente en modelos híbridos que combinan aprendizaje asincrónico, simulación clínica (incluyendo tele-OSCE) y práctica supervisada. Las competencias más frecuentemente abordadas corresponden a la comunicación clínica virtual y habilidades técnicas digitales, mientras que dominios como profesionalismo digital y seguridad de datos están subrepresentados. Los métodos de evaluación se basan predominantemente en encuestas de percepción y medidas de autoconfianza, con limitada utilización de evaluaciones objetivas. Se identifican brechas relevantes, incluyendo falta de estandarización curricular, escasez de estudios longitudinales y ausencia de marcos de competencias uniformes. Conclusiones: La formación en telemedicina en pregrado médico es un campo en expansión, con alta variabilidad en su implementación y evaluación. Se requiere avanzar hacia una integración curricular más estructurada, basada en competencias estandarizadas, con métodos de evaluación robustos y adaptados a distintos contextos. Futuras investigaciones deberían enfocarse en diseños longitudinales y en la evaluación objetiva del impacto en el desempeño clínico.
Descargas
-
Resumen0
-
pdf0
-
pdf 0
-
xml0
Citas
1. World Health Organization. Geneva: WHO. Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025. 2021.
2. Keesara S, Jonas A, Schulman K. Covid-19 and health care’s digital revolution. N Engl J Med. 2020, 382, e82. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2005835.
3. Darnton R, Lopez T, Anil M, et al. Medical students consulting from home: A qualitative evaluation of a tool to maintain student exposure to patients during lockdown. Med Teach. 2021, 43, 160-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1829576.
4. Iancu AM, Kemp MT, Alam HB. Unmuting medical students' education: Utilizing telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Med Internet Res. 2020, 22, e19667. https://doi.org/10.2196/19667.
5. Chike-Harris KE, Durham C, Logan A, Smith G, DuBose-Morris R. Integration of Telehealth Education into the Health Care Provider Curriculum: A Review. Telemed J E Health. 2021, 27, 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0261.
6. Edirippulige S, Armfield NR. Education and training to support the use of clinical telehealth: A review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare. 2017, 23, 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X16632968.
7. Waseh S, Dicker AP. Telemedicine training in undergraduate medical education: Mixed-methods review. JMIR Med Educ. 2019, 5, e12515. https://doi.org/10.2196/12515.
8. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005, 8, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
9. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010, 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
10. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018, 169, 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.
11. Pourmand A, Ghassemi M, Sumon K, Amini SB, Hood C, Sikka N. Lack of Telemedicine Training in Academic Medicine: Are We Preparing the Next Generation? Telemed J E Health. 2021, 27, 62-67. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0287.
12. Khullar D, Mullangi S, Yu J, Weems K, Shipman SA, Caulfield M, et al. The state of telehealth education at U.S. medical schools. Healthcare. 2021, 9, 100522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100522.
13. Alhur A. Curricular Analysis of Digital Health and Health Informatics in Medical Colleges Across Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2024, 16, e66892. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66892.
14. Behrends, M., Paulmann, V., Koop, C., Foadi, N., Mikuteit, M., & Steffens, S. Interdisciplinary Teaching of Digital Competencies for Undergraduate Medical Students - Experiences of a Teaching Project by Medical Informatics and Medicine. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2021, 281, 891-895. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI210307.
15. Punzalan JK, Punzalan MG. Integrating digital health competencies in community-engaged medical education: A scoping review for developing teaching and learning strategies for digital health. J Educ Health Promot. 2025, 14, 190. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1240_24.
16. Carney M, Thornton ME, Avancha K, Nolin JR, Alexander J. The Need for Telehealth Education in the Medical School Curriculum. Cureus. 2025, 17, e90598. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.90598.
17. Abbas D. From classroom to clinic: A student’s perspective. Digital Health. 2025, 32, 443-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-23901-4.00032-5.
18. Ahmad MS, Shaik RA, Alzahrani R, Bhat M, Matbouly G, Ahsan M, et al. The effect of medical informatics training on students’ knowledge and attitude to use it in future medical work: a comparative study among Saudi medical students. Bangladesh J Med Sci. 2025, 23, S170-S177. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v24i10.79198.
19. Bigay R, Dhombres F, Tannier X, Seroussi B. Teaching Digital Health at Sorbonne University: The Year One Review of the SN@SU Project. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025, 311, 1412-1416. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251071.
20. Ostrovsky DA, Heflin MT, Bowers MT, Hudak NM, Leiman ER, Truong T, et al. Development, Implementation, and Assessment of an Online Modular Telehealth Curriculum for Health Professions Students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024, 15, 743-753. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S468833.
21. DuBose-Morris R, McSwain SD, McElligott JT, King KL, Ziniel S, Harvey J. Building telehealth teams of the future through interprofessional curriculum development: A five-year mixed methodology study. J Interprof Care. 2023, 37, 100-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.2005556.
22. Cheng C, Humphreys H, Kane B. Transition to telehealth: Engaging medical students in telemedicine healthcare delivery. Ir J Med Sci. 2021, 191, 2405-2422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02720-1.
23. Newnham A, Tattersall T, Odendaal J. Do Medical Schools Need to Adapt Their Curriculum in Order to Teach Medical Students Webside Manner? A Systematic Review. Med Sci Educ. 2025, 1, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02498-2.
24. Kyyhkynen R, Peltonen LM, Smed J. Videoconferencing Applications for Training Professionals on Nonverbal Communication in Online Clinical Consultations. Healthc Inform Res. 2023, 29, 394-399. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2023.29.4.394.
25. Abrams MP, Hartman E, Kay D, Kauffman C, Castiglioni A. Lessons Learned in the Design and Implementation of Virtual Telemedicine Curriculum for Third Year Medical Students Incorporating New AAMC Telehealth Competencies. MedEdPublish. 2021, 10, 154. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2021.000154.1.
26. Rivet EB, Feldman M, Khandelwal S, Anderson A, Bedros N, et al. Adapting Compassionate Conversations for Virtual Mediated Communication. J Surg Educ. 2023, 80, 1296-1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.06.012.
27. Greengold J, Spahic H, Serwint J, Dlhosh S, Barouch L, Gattamorta K, et al. Novel educational strategies to improve the telemedicine clinical skills of medical students. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025, 26, e10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625000040.
28. Vogt L, Schmidt M, Follmann A, Lenes A, Klasen M, Sopka S. Telemedicine in medical education: An example of a digital preparatory course for the clinical traineeship - a pre-post comparison. GMS J Med Educ. 2022, 39, Doc46. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001567.
29. Cheok Liew S, Tan MP, Breen E, Krishnan K, Sivarajah I, Raviendran N, et al. Microlearning and online simulation-based virtual consultation training module for the undergraduate medical curriculum: a preliminary evaluation. BMC Med Educ. 2023, 23, 796. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04777-1.
30. Frankl SE, Joshi A, Onorato S, Jawahir GL, Pelletier SR, Dalrymple JL, et al. Preparing Future Doctors for Telemedicine: An Asynchronous Curriculum for Medical Students Implemented During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acad Med. 2021, 96, 1696-1701. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004260.
31. Bajra, R., Srinivasan, M., Torres, E. C., Rydel, T., & Schillinger, E. Training future clinicians in telehealth competencies: outcomes of a telehealth curriculum and teleOSCEs at an academic medical center. Frontiers in Medicine. 2023, 10, 1222181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1222181.
32. Adams JE, Ecker DJ. Telehealth: from the abstract to necessity to competency. FASEB BioAdvances. 2021, 3, 475-481. https://doi.org/10.1096/fba.2020-00098.
33. Noronha C, Lo MC, Nikiforova T, Jones D, Nandiwada DR, Leung TI, et al. Telehealth Competencies in Medical Education: New Frontiers in Faculty Development and Learner Assessments. J Gen Intern Med. 2022, 37, 3168-3173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07564-8.
34. Anawati MK. Virtual Care in Undergraduate Medical Education: perspectives beyond the pandemic. Can Med Educ J. 2022, 13, 92-98. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.73879.
35. Car J, Ong QC, Fox TE, Leightley D, Kemp SJ, Švab I, et al. The Digital Health Competencies in Medical Education Framework: An International Consensus Statement Based on a Delphi Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2025, 8, e2453131. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53131.
36. Muntz MD, Franco J, Ferguson CC, Ark TK, Kalet A. Telehealth and Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19—and Beyond. Acad Med. 2021, 96, 1655-1659. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004014.
37. Costich M, Picoraro J, Scott T, Barron B, Feldman E, Friedman S. Creation of a Multimodal Telemedicine Curriculum for Preclinical Medical Students. MedEdPORTAL. 2025, 21, 11483. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11483.
38. Cheema M, Awan OA. Virtual Clinical Shadowing: The Future of Medical Student Education Through Telemedicine. Acad Radiol. 2026, 33, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.030.
39. Cruz-Panesso I, Tanoubi I, Drolet P. Telehealth Competencies: Training Physicians for a New Reality? Healthcare. 2023, 12, 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12010093.
40. Murren-Boezem J, Zettler-Greeley CM, Ali-Panzarella A, Solo-Josephson P. Development of a Virtual Pediatric Telemedicine Training Program. Telemed Rep. 2024, 5, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2024.0004.
41. Bajra R, Frazier W, Graves L, Jacobson K, Rodriguez A, Theobald M, et al. Feasibility and Acceptability of a US National Telemedicine Curriculum for Medical Students and Residents: Multi-institutional Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2023, 9, e43190. https://doi.org/10.2196/43190.
42. Moeini S, Honarvar MR, Aarabi M, Kabir MJ, Aarabi M. Developing a structured telemedicine curriculum for medical students: a qualitative study based on expert interviews. BMC Med Educ. 2026, 26, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08409-8.
43. Wamsley M, Cornejo L, Kryzhanovskaya I, Lin BW, Sullivan J, Yoder J, et al. Best Practices for Integrating Medical Students Into Telehealth Visits. JMIR Med Educ. 2021, 7, e27877. https://doi.org/10.2196/27877.
44. Sartori DJ, Lawrence K. Simulating Virtual Care: Integrating Telemedicine into Objective Structured Clinical Training. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations. 2025, 9, 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-88752-9.
Derechos de autor 2026 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia
2. Las obras se publican bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0.
![]()
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones preprint (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.





This is a Diamond Journal 






