Covid-19, an opportunity to compare in-person and online teaching


Palabras clave: online teaching; medicine teaching; synchronous teaching; medical education


For years it has been discussed the dichotomy between traditional in-person teaching versus online instruction. The lockdown, consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic, gave us an opportunity to gain evidence and compare in-person versus online teaching by the same professor, in the same subject and by the same students which is an interesting scenario because the only variable is the teaching setup. Here, we conducted a survey of students that following a traditional in-person subject were abruptly compelled to continue it online. We summarize the students’ responses when asked to compare both types of teaching with the singularity that the rest of variables were kept constant. Finally, we compared the grades of this “hybrid taught” group of students with the grades from groups of previous years in the same subject, by the same instructor, but totally in-person. We, as medical teachers, were excited about the possibility that the online teaching forced by the Covid-19 pandemic will develop in the system for delivering our lectures in the near future. Even considering that grades were not affected and pros such as comfort and participation, according to our study, students prefer in person education mainly because the direct contact and interaction with peers and teachers.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.


Cargando métricas ...


Smith D, Schlaepfer P, Major K, Dyble M, Page AE, Thompson J, et al. Cooperation and the evolution of hunter-gatherer storytelling. Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1):1853,017-02036-8.

Waits T, and Lewis L. Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000-2001. National Center for Education statistics. 2003.

Tallent-Runnels M, Thomas J, Lan W, Cooper S, Ahern T, Shaw, SM and Liu, X. Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research. 2006; 76 (1):93-136.

Brockfeld T, Muller B, de Laffolie J. Video versus live lecture courses: A comparative evaluation of lecture types and results. Med Educ Online. 2018; 23(1):1555434.

Paegle RD, Wilkinson EJ, Donnelly MB. Videotaped vs traditional lectures for medical students. Med Educ. 1980; 14(6):387-93.

Schreiber BE, Fukuta J, Gordon F. Live lecture versus video podcast in undergraduate medical education: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2010; 10:68,6920-10-68.

Spickard A,3rd, Alrajeh N, Cordray D, Gigante J. Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: Does it matter? J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17(7):540-5.

Leinonen J, Laitala ML, Pirttilahti J, Niskanen L, Pesonen P, Anttonen V. Live lectures and videos do not differ in relation to learning outcomes of dental ergonomics. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020; 6(5):489-94.

Paul, J and Jefferson F. A comparative analysis of student performance in an online vs. face-to-face environmental science course from 2009 to 2016. Front Comput Sci. 2019; 1:1-9.

Ramlogan S, Raman V, Sweet J. A comparison of two forms of teaching instruction: Video vs. live lecture for education in clinical periodontology. Eur J Dent Educ. 2014; 18(1):31-8.

Fernandes L, Maley MA, Cruickshank C. The impact of online lecture recordings on learning outcomes in pharmacology. J Int Assoc Med Sci Educators. 2008; 18(2):62-70.

Doggrell S. Does attending lectures matter when lecture recordings are available? results for a preliminary study comparing attending and non-attending nursing students in bioscience and pharmacology. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 2018; 26(7):1-10.

Figlio D, Rush M, Yin L. Is it live or is ti internet? experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning. Journal of Labor Economics. 2013; 31(4):763-84.

DeBrock L, Scagnoli N, Taghaboni-Dutta F. The human element in online learning. Inside higher education. 2020;

Lowenthal P, Bauer C, Chen K. Student perceptions of online learning: An analysis of online course evaluations. American Journal of Distance Education. 2015; 29(2):85-97.

Ward M, Peters G, Shelley K. Student and faculty perceptions of the quality of online learning experiences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2010; 11(3):57-77.

Ferreira J. Online vs. in-person courses. which ones are better? https://mappingignorance org/2017/09/18/online-vs-person-courses-ones-better/. 2017.

Sit JW, Chung JW, Chow MC, Wong TK. Experiences of online learning: Students' perspective. Nurse Educ Today. 2005; 25(2):140-7.

Alpert WT, Couch KA, Harmon O.R. A randomized assessment of online learning

. American Economic Review. 2016; 106(5):378-82.

Joyce TJ, Crockett S, Jaeger DA, Altindag O, O’Connell S.D. Does classroom time matter?

. Economics of Education Review. 2015; 46:64-77.

Bowen WG, Chingos MM, Lack, K.A., and Nygren, T.I. Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six-campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2014; 33(1):94-111.

Knupfer NN, Gram TE, Larsen EZ. Participant analysis of a multi-class,multi-state, on-line, discussion list. Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1997 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology (ED 409845) Ames: Iowa State University. 1997.

Ahern T, Durrington V. Effects of anonymity and group saliency on participation and interaction ia a computer mediated small-group discussion. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 2014; 28(2):133-47.

Sullivan P. It's easier to be yourself when you are invisible: Female college students discuss their online classroom experiences. Innovative Higher Education. 2002; 27:129-43.

Cómo citar
Bru, S., Ribeiro, M. P., Quandt, E., Clotet, J., & Jiménez Jiménez, J. (2021). Covid-19, an opportunity to compare in-person and online teaching. Revista Española de Educación Médica, 2(2).