Tecnologías digitales y ecologías de aprendizaje: desafíos y oportunidades

Autores/as

  • Francisco-José Santos-Caamaño Universidade da Coruña, España
  • María-José Vázquez-Cancelo Universidade da Coruña, España
  • Eduardo-Rafael Rodríguez-Machado Universidade da Coruña, España
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.466091
Palabras clave: ecologías de aprendizaje, aprendizaje a lo largo de la vida, TIC, método Delphi

Resumen

La tecnología ha devenido, hoy en día, un factor primordial de cuyo adecuado empleo depende en gran medida el funcionamiento de los diversos contextos del aprendizaje humano. La teoría ecológica del aprendizaje considera el factor tecnológico como un componente especialmente relevante. Además, las tecnologías digitales están potenciando el desarrollo de nuevas oportunidades de aprendizaje que trascienden las fronteras temporales y geográficas, y propician sistemas que rompen el encorsetamiento de las estructuras de formación formal dando paso a ambientes flexibles, expandidos y diversos desde los que se favorecen mecanismos de aprendizaje informal. Desde esta perspectiva, y de cara a la construcción de tales contextos, resulta conveniente disponer de un marco de referencia paradigmático acerca de las oportunidades que las TIC puedan presentar y, paralelamente, valorar también la problemática asociada a su empleo. Para la identificación de este elenco de affordances tecnológicas, hemos seguido el método Delphi, en cuyo desarrollo han colaborado diversos expertos nacionales e internacionales. El análisis de resultados confirma el papel destacado de los usos tecnológicos en los contextos de aprendizaje actuales, y desvela su funcionamiento en íntima relación con los demás componentes que los integran. Resaltan no solo los aspectos potenciadores del aprendizaje, como son, entre otros, la facilitación de diversas herramientas de comunicación, acceso e intercambio de información, su potencialidad para la creación de vínculos entre personas y comunidades, y la transformación de los roles educativos. Se desvela también la emergencia de ciertas barreras en su empleo, como la ausencia de estrategias de uso. En este sentido, y siempre sobre la base del análisis de la configuración concreta de cada contexto, de sus elementos e interrelaciones, puede manejarse un marco de referencia general de affordances tecnológicas que sirva de guía para el desarrollo de una ecología de aprendizaje auténtica.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Adler, M. y Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers

Akins, R. B., Tolson, H. y Cole, B. R. (2005). Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: Application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC medical research methodology, 5(1), 37. https ://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-37

Area, M. y Pessoa, T. (2012). De lo sólido a lo líquido: Las nuevas alfabetizaciones ante los cambios culturales de la Web 2.0. Comunicar. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 38(19), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.3916/c38-2012-02-01

Arrigo, M., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., y Kismihok, G. (2013). Metaanalyses from a collaborative project in mobile lifelong learning. British Educational Research Journal, 39, 222–247. doi: 10.1080/01411926.2011.65206

Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Enviroments-the future of eLearning? Elearning papers, 2(1), 1-8. recuperado de https://vcut.org/345.pdf&hl=es&sa=T&oi=gsb-gga&ct=res&cd=0&d=4529383974035248294&ei=2e_gX_qNIo-Ny9YPt6-10Ac&scisig=AAGBfm0z5ta8qbrBLorNie-XD35vp2v5jQ

Avella, J. R. (2016). Delphi panels: Research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 305–421. https ://doi.org/10.28945/ 3561

Bakker, A. y Akkerman, S. F. (2014). A boundary-crossing approach to support students’ integration of statistical and work-related knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9517-z

Banks, J., Au, K., Ball, A., Bell, P., Gordon, E., Gutierrez, K., Heath, S., Lee, C. Lee. Y., Mahiri, J., Nasir, N., Valdés, G. y Zhou, M. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments. Life-long, Life-wide, Life-deep. (Consensus Report). Learning in Informal and Formal Environment (LIFE) Center. Recuperado de http://life-slc.org/docs/Banks_etal-LIFE-Diversity-Report.pdf

Barab, S. A. y Roth, W. M. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowing from an ecological perspective. Educational researcher, 35(5), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035005003

Barron, B. (2006a). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human development, 49(4), 193-224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368

Barron, B. (2006b). Configurations of Learning Settings and Networks - Implications of a Learning Ecology Perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 229-231. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094370

Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity

Becket, D. y Hager, P. (2002). Life, work and learning. Practice in postmodernity. New York: Routledge

Billet, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest (Australia): Allen y Unwin

Boyer, S., Edmonson, D., Artis, A, y Fleming, D. (2014). Self-Directed Learning. A Tool for Lifelong Learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 36, 20-32, https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475313494010

Brown, J. (2000). Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education and the ways people learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(2),11-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380009601719

Bull, G., Thompson, A., Searson, M., Garofalo, J., Park, J., Young, C. y Lee, J. (2008). Connecting informal and formal learning: Experiences in the age of participatory media. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 100-107. Recuperado de https://www.learntechlib.org/p/29328/

Çetinkaya, L. y Keser, H. (2018). Adaptation of interaction in web environments with educational content. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 10(3), 142–152. https ://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v10i3.3555

Charro E. (2020). A curricular Delphi study to improve the science education of secondary school students in Spain. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(2), 282-304. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21655

Cilliers, P. (2005). Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(5), 255–267. https ://doi.org/10.1177/02632 76405 058052

Cyphert, F. R. y Gant, W. L. (1971). The Delphi technique: A case study. Phi Delta Kappa, 52, 272–273

Dabbagh, N. y Castaneda, L. (2020). The PLE as a framework for developing agency in lifelong learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3041-3055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09831-z

Dans, I., Fuentes, E. J., González-Sanmamed, M. y Muñoz-Carril, P. C. (2021). El reto de los profesores de secundaria ante las redes sociales. Educar, 57(1), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.1151

Dans, I., González-Sanmamed, M. y Muñoz-Carril, P. C. (2019). Redes sociales, adolescencia y familia: desafíos y oportunidades. Publicaciones, 49(2), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v49i2.8527

Day, J. y Bobeva, M. (2005). A generic toolkit for the successful management of Delphi studies. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology, 3(2), 103–116. Recuperado de from http://www.ejbrm.com/volum e3/issue 2/p103

De la Selva, A. (2015). Los nuevos rostros de la desigualdad en el siglo XXI: la brecha digital. Revista mexicana de ciencias políticas y sociales, 60(233), 265-285.

Donohoe, H., Stellefson, M. y Tennant, B. (2012). Advantages and limitations of the e-Delphi technique: Implications for health education researchers. American Journal of Health Education, 43(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325 037.2012.10599216

Eraut, M. (2000). Non‐formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British journal of educational psychology, 70(1), 113-136. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158001

Estévez, I. (2020). Análisis del desarrollo profesional del docente universitario de Ciencias de la Salud a través de las Ecologías de Aprendizaje [Tesis no publicada]. Universidade da Coruña

Foresto E. (2020). Aprendizajes formales, no formales e informales. Una revisión teórica holistica. Contextos de Educación 29 (21). Recuperado de http://www2.hum.unrc.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/contextos/article/download/1142/1234

García-Martínez, J. G. y González-Sanmamed, M. (2019). Cómo generan y gestionan contenidos los estudiantes de educación de Costa Rica: una contribución al estudio de su entorno personal de aprendizaje. Digital Education Review, (36), 15-35. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7282526.pdf

Gibson, J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

González-Sanmamed, M., Estévez, I., Souto-Seijo, A. y Muñoz-Carril, P. C. (2020). Ecologías digitales de aprendizaje y desarrollo profesional del docente universitario. Comunicar. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 28(62), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.3916/C62-2020-01

González‐Sanmamed, M., Muñoz‐Carril, P.C. y Santos‐Caamaño, F. J. (2019). Key components of learning ecologies: A Delphi assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1639-1655. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/bjet.12805

González-Sanmamed, M., Souto-Seijo, A., González, I. y Estévez, I. (2019). Aprendizaje informal y desarrollo profesional: análisis de las ecologías de aprendizaje del profesorado de educación infantil. Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (68), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2019.68.1305

Gouthro, P. A. (2017): The promise of lifelong learning, International. Journal of Lifelong Education, 36 (1-2), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2017.1270067

Hasson, F., Keeney, S. y McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. https ://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x

Jackson, N. J. (2013). The Concept of Learning Ecologies. En N.J. Jackson y G. B. Cooper (Eds.), Lifewide Learning Education and Personal Development (pp.1-21). [E-book]. Recuperado de http://www.lifewideebook.co.uk/uploads/1/0/8/4/10842717/chapter_a5.pdf

Jarvis, P. (2007). Globalization, lifelong learning, and the learning society: Sociological Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge

Jarvis, P. (2014). From adult education to lifelong learning and beyond. Comparative Education, 50(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.871832

Kalantzis, M., y Cope, B. (2015). Learning and new media. En D. Scott and E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The sage handbook of learning (pp. 373-387). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Keeney, S., Hasson, F. y McKenna, H. (2011). The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https ://doi.org/10.1002/97814 44392029.

Kek, M. y Huijser, H. (2017). Problem-based learning into the future. Imagining an agile PBL ecology for learning. Singapore: Springer

Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Linstone, H. A. y Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Livingstone, D. W. (2001). Adults' Informal Learning: Definitions, Findings, Gaps, and Future Research. NALL Working Paper #21. Recuperado de https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED452390.pdf

López-Gómez, E. (2018). El método Delphi en la investigación actual en educación: una revisión teórica y metodológica. Educación XXI, 21(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.5944/educx x1.20169

Luckin, R. (2008). The learner centric ecology of resources: A framework for using technology to scaffold learning. Computers & Education, 50(2), 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.018

Maina, M. F. y González, I. G. (2016). Articulating personal pedagogies through learning ecologies. En B. Gros, Kinshuk y M. Maina (Eds.), The Future of Ubiquitous Learning: Learning Designs for Emerging Pedagogies (pp. 73-.94). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3_5

Manuti, A., Pastore, S., Scardigno, A., Giancaspro, M. y Morciano, D. (2015). Formal and informal learning in the workplace: a research review. International journal of training and development, 19(1), 1-17. Recuperado de http://www.academia.edu/download/44528973/Formal_and_informal_learning_in_the_work20160408-3135-10ztkix.pdf

Mason R. y Rennie F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge

McIntyre-Hite, L. (2016). A Delphi study of effective practices for developing competency-based learning models in higher education. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 1, 157–166. https ://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1029

Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A. y Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. Los Angeles: Sage

Mirata, V., Hirt, F., Bergamin, P. y Van der Westhuizen, C. (2020). Challenges and contexts in establishing adaptive learning in higher education: findings from a Delphi Study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00209-y

Mohr, S. C. y Shelton, K. (2017). Best practices framework for online faculty professional development: A Delphi study. Online Learning Journal, 21(4), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.24059/ olj.v21i4.1273

Nardi, B. (1996). Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. En B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Nasir, N. I. S. y Cooks, J. (2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(1), 41-61.https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01027.x

Okoli, C. y Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002

Plesch, C., Kaendler, C., Rummel, N., Wiedmann, M. y Spada, H. (2013). Identifying areas of tension in the field of technology-enhanced learning: Results of an international Delphi study. Computers & Education, 65, 92–105. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.compe du.2013.01.018

Pozzi, F., Manganello, F., Passarelli, M., Persico, D., Brasher, A., Holmes, W.,Whitelock, D. & Sangrà, A. (2019). Ranking Meets Distance Education: Defining Relevant Criteria and Indicators for Online Universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 42-63. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4391

Prestridge, S. (2018). Categorising teachers’ use of social media for their professional learning: A self-generating professional learning paradigm. Computers & Education, 129, 143-158. https://doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.003

Renon, F. (2013). Personal learning environments (PLEs): ecologies for building student capability for lifelong learning. Recuperado de https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/frp/27423.pdf

Rogoff, B., Callanan, M., Gutiérrez, K. D. y Erickson F. (2016). The Organization of Informal Learning. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 356-401. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16680994

Romeu-Fontanillas, T., Guitert-Catasús, M., Raffaghelli, J. E. y Sangrà, A. (2020). Ecologías de aprendizaje para usar las TIC inspirándose en docentes referentes. Comunicar. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 28(62), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.3916/C62-2020-03

Rowe, G. y Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353–375. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7

Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. California: Sage

Sangrà, A., González-Sanmamed, M. y Guitert, M. (2013). Learning ecologies: Informal professional development opportunities for teachers. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1/201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CICEM.2013.6820171

Sangrà, A., Raffaghelli, J. & Guitert, M. (2019). Learning ecologies through a lens: Ontological, methodological and applicative issues. A systematic review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET), 50(4), 1619-1638, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12795

Santos-Caamaño, F. J. (2019). Ecologías de aprendizaje en la formación de los futuros mestros [Tesis no publicada]. Universidade da Coruña

Shaikh, Z. A. y Khoja, S. A. (2014). Personal learning environments and university teacher roles explored using Delphi. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 202–226. https ://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.324

Sharar, B. (2016). Emergent Pedagogy in England: A Critical Realist Study of Structure-Agency Interactions in Higher Education. Nueva York, NY: Routledge

Skulmoski, G., Hartman, F. y Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), 1–21, https ://doi.org/10.28945/ 199

Stevens, R., Bransford, J. y Stevens, A. (2005). The LIFE Center’s lifelong and lifewide diagram. Retrieved from http://life-slc.org/about/about.htm

Ventimiglia, P. y Pullman, G. (marzo de 2016). From written to digital: The new literacy. EDUCAUSE Review. Recuperado de https://er.educause.edu/~/media/files/articles/2016/3/erm1623.pdf.

Widodo, A., Maria, R. A y Fitriani, A. (2017). Constructivist learning environment during virtual and real laboratory activities. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 9(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/ 10.15294/biosaintifika.v9i1.7959

Williams, R., Karousou, R. y Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 39–59. https ://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.883

Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., Hwang, F. K. y Lin, T. C. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK—practical) through the Delphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 707–722. https ://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078

Zimmerman, B. J. y Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2012). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New york, NY:Springer

Publicado
24-06-2021
Cómo citar
Santos-Caamaño, F.-J., Vázquez-Cancelo, M.-J., & Rodríguez-Machado, E.-R. (2021). Tecnologías digitales y ecologías de aprendizaje: desafíos y oportunidades. Educatio Siglo XXI, 39(2), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.466091