Building inferences in reading comprehension: A correlational study

Authors

  • Itzi Paulina Medina Jiménez Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, México
  • Carlos González Di Pierro Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Mexico
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.451971
Keywords: Reading, understanding, inferences, mental operations, text tipology, discourse

Abstract

This piece of research aims to identify if there is any correlation between passing a reading university course (with Spanish as a first language) and an improvement in reading comprehension, compared with the reading level obtained before attending the classes. After testing our reading comprehension tool among different pilot groups, we reach the final version, which has two different texts: the first one is a technical text, which requires readers to make propositional inferences, and the second one is a humanistic text, which requires readers to make pragmatic inferences. The analysis of the results was undertaken in two phases: first, we evaluated the reading comprehension level of each text, and second, we compared both levels to know if students who had passed had a higher reading comprehension level than students who had never taken this reading course. The discussion showed that there is not any correlation between technical test performance and humanistic test performance; neither is there a correlation between passing the subject and the level of reading comprehension. Moreover, reading comprehension did not show any significant improvement. In sum, after taking the entire course, students are still unable to perform the mental operations needed to reach the representation level (propositional or pragmatical) expected to comprehend both text types.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cañas, A. y Novak, J. (2006). La teoría subyacente a los mapas conceptuales y a cómo construirlos. Reporte Técnico IHMC CmapTools 2006-01. Florida: Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.

Chikalanga, I. (1992). A Suggested Taxonomy of Inferences for the Reading Teacher. Reading a Foreign Languaje, 8 (2), 697-709 pp.

Cros, E. (1993). Sociología de la literatura. En M. Angenot, M. et al., Teoría literaria (145-171 pp.). México: Siglo XXI.

Cuenca, J. y Hilferty, J. (2006). Introducción a la lingüística cognitiva. Barcelona: Ariel.

Gadamer, H. (1993). Verdad y método. Salamanca: Sígueme.

Hewitt, P. (2007). Física conceptual. México: Pearson Educación.

Ingarden, R. (1998). La obra de arte literaria. México: Alfaguara.

Morín, E. (1999). Los siete saberes necesarios para la educación del futuro. París: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura.

Ricoeur, P. (1999). Teoría de la interpretación: discurso y excedente de sentido. México: Siglo XXI.

Savater, F. (18 de mayo de 1997). ¿Mundo homogéneo?. El país semanal, p. 10.

Tuffanelli, L. (2010). Comprender. ¿Qué es? ¿Cómo funciona?. Madrid: Narcea-Ministerio de Educación.

Van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

Published
25-02-2021
How to Cite
Medina Jiménez, I. P., & González Di Pierro, C. (2021). Building inferences in reading comprehension: A correlational study. Educatio Siglo XXI, 39(1), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.451971