Deliberación en democracias digitales: ¿es factible el ideal de una ciudadanía competente?

Autori

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.611681
Parole chiave: democracia, competencia, ciudadanía, deliberación, factibilidad

Agenzie di supporto

  • (Beca FPU) Ministerio de Educación
  • (Beca Postdoctoral) Fundación Irla

Abstract

En este trabajo defiendo que el ideal de una ciudadanía competente es viable incluso en los contextos adversos que ofrecen las sociedades digitales. Para ello, identifico cinco problemas que obstaculizan a la ciudadanía la adquisición de competencia política: el pluralismo, el problema del moderador, la dificultad para acceder a información relevante, la apatía política y los sesgos políticos. Aunque estos problemas se agudizan en las democracias digitales, muestro que existen mecanismos institucionales que permiten corregir y mitigar sus efectos perjudiciales sobre la competencia política. Por ello, concluyo, el ideal de ciudadanía competente es prima facie factible y podría lograrse mediante la implementación de medidas institucionales que fomenten la adquisición de competencia política por parte de la ciudadanía.     

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Aristóteles. (2010). Política. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Bartlett, J. (2018). The People Vs Tech: How the internet is killing democracy. Ebury Press.

Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Bohman, J. (2000). The Division of Labor in Democratic Discourse: Media, Experts, and Deliberative Democracy, en S. Chambers & A. N. Costain (eds.), Deliberation, Democracy, and the Media (pp. 47–64). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

Boudreau, C. (2009). Making Citizens Smart: When Do Institutions Improve Unsophisticated Citizens’ Decisions? Political Behavior, 31(2), 287–306.

Brennan, J. (2011). The Ethics of Voting. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Brown, R. D. (1996). The Strength of a People. The Idea of an Informed Citizenry in America, 1650-1870. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Christiano, T. (1996). The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.

Christiano, T. (2015). Voter Ignorance Is Not Necessarily a Problem. Critical Review, 27(3–4), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2015.1111669

Constant, B. (1989). De la libertad de los antiguos comparada con la de los modernos. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.

Curran, J. (2002). Media and Power. Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis.

Curran, J., Fenton, N. y Freedman, D. (Eds.). (2013). Misunderstanding the Internet. London: Routledge.

Dahl, R. A. (1998). On democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

De Jouvenel, B. (1961). The Chairman’s Problem. American Political Science Review, 55(2), 368–372.

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper Collins.

Gilens, M., & Murakawa, N. (2002). Elite Cues and Political Decision Making. Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation, 6, 15–49.

Green, J. E. (2004). Apathy: the democratic disease. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 30(4–5), 745–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453704045763

Green, J. E. (2010). The eyes of the people: democracy in an age of spectatorship. New York: Oxford University Press.

Guillery, D. (2021). The Concept of Feasibility: A Multivocal Account. Res Publica, 27(3), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-020-09497-7

Hamilton, Alexander Madison, J., & Jay, J. (2009). El Federalista. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Helberger, N. (2011). Media Diversity from the User’s Perspective: An Introduction. Journal of Information Policy, 1, 241–245. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.1.2011.0241

Herzog, L. (2023). Citizen Knowledge. Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy. New York: Oxford University press.

Innerarity, D. (2011). La democracia del conocimiento. Por una sociedad inteligente. Barcelona: Paidós.

Innerarity, D. (2020). Una teoría de la democracia compleja. Gobernar en el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg.

Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., & Rich, R. F. (2001). The Political Environment and Citizen Competence. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 410–424.

Kunda, Z. (1990). The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.

Lafont, C. (2020). Democracy without Shortcuts. New York: Oxford University Press.

Landa, D. & Pevnick, R. (2020). “Representative Democracy as Defensible Epistocracy.” American Political Science Review 114(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000509.

Lepoutre, M. (2020). Democratic Group Cognition. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 48(1), 40–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12157

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and coping with the post-truth era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008

Lippmann, W. (1991). Public opinion. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Lippmann, W. (1993). The Phantom Public. Politics. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. A. (1998). The democratic dilemma: can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of representative government. Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press.

Martí, J. L. (2017). Pluralism and consensus in deliberative democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(5), 556–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1328089

McChesney, R.W., y Nichols, J. (2010). The Death and Life of American Journalism. New York: Nation Books.

Meiklejohn, A. (1965). Political Freedom: the Constitutional Powers of the People. Oxford University Press.

Mercier, H. y Landemore, H. (2012) “Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation.” Political Psychology 33 (2): 423–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.

Moe, H. (2020). Distributed readiness citizenship: A realistic, normative concept for citizens’ public connection. Communication Theory, 30(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/CT/QTZ016

Page, B. I. (1996). Who deliberates?: mass media in modern democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: what the Internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press.

Parkinson, J., & Mansbridge, J. (Eds.). (2012). Deliberative Systems. Deliberative Democracy at the large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Persily, N. y Tucker, J.A. (Eds.). (2020). Social Media and Democracy. The State of the Field and Prospects for Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Posner, R. A. (2003). Law, pragmatism, and democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ramonet, I. (1998). La tiranía de la comunicación. Madrid: Debate.

Rapeli, L. (2014). The Conception of Citizen Knowledge in Democratic Theory. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

Rawls, J. (1997). The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765–807. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600311

Rousseau, J.-J. (1998). El contrato social. Madrid: Tecnos.

Schumpeter, J. A. (2003). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.

Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x

Taggart, P. A. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge. Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Heaven: Yale University Press.

Thorson, E. (2016). Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation. Political Communication, 33(3), 460–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187

Urbinati, N. (2015). “A Revolt Against Intermediary Bodies”. Constellations, 22(4), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12188

Vallier, K. (2011) “Convergence and Consensus in Public Reason.” Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (4): 261–79.

Wagner, A. (2022). “Retos Filosóficos de Las Sociedades Digitales: Esbozo de Un Enfoque Sistémico.” Dilemata 38: 13–29.

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Strasbourg.

Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pubblicato
01-09-2024
Come citare
Marciel Pariente, R. (2024). Deliberación en democracias digitales: ¿es factible el ideal de una ciudadanía competente?. Daimon, (93), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.611681
Fascicolo
Sezione
MONOGRÁFICO sobre «Diversidad y deliberación en entornos digitales». Artículos: Democracia, deliberación y tolerancia en contextos digitales