Response to Comments

Autores/as

  • Karen Frost-Arnold
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.620301
Palabras clave: ética, epistemología, feminismo

Resumen

Respuesta de Karen Frost-Arnold a los comentarios

Karen Frost-Arnold's response to comments

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Brinkmann, Matthias. 2022. “In Defence of Non-Ideal Political Deference.” Episteme 19 (2): 264–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2020.26.

Cherry, Myisha V. 2021. The Case for Rage: Why Anger Is Essential to Anti-Racist Struggle. New York: Oxford University Press.

Citron, Danielle Keats. 2022. The Fight for Privacy: Protecting Dignity, Identity, and Love in the Digital Age. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Dotson, Kristie. 2011. “Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing.” Hypatia 26 (2): 236–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x.

Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and Ethics in Knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.

Frost-Arnold, Karen. 2014. “Imposters, Tricksters, and Trustworthiness as an Epistemic Virtue.” Hypatia 29 (4): 790–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12107.

Frost-Arnold, Karen. 2018. “Wikipedia.” In Routledge Handbook of Applied Epistemology, edited by David Coady and James Chase, 28–40. New York: Routledge.

Frost-Arnold, Karen. 2023. Who Should We Be Online? A Social Epistemology for the Internet. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Gaitán Torres, Antonio. 2024. “Epistemic Communities and Trust in Digital Contexts.” Daimon: The International Journal of Philosophy.

Jones, Karen. 2002. “The Politics of Credibility.” In A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, edited by Louise Antony and Charlotte Witt, 154–76. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Levy, Neil. 2019. “Due Deference to Denialism: Explaining Ordinary People’s Rejection of Established Scientific Findings.” Synthese 196 (1): 313–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1477-x.

McKinnon, Rachel. 2017. “Allies Behaving Badly: Gaslighting as Epistemic Injustice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, edited by Ian James Kidd, José Medina, and Gaile Pohlhaus Jr., 167–74. New York: Routledge.

Medina Vizuete, Lola, and Daniel Barbarrusa. Forthcoming. “Am I Still Young at 20? Online Bubbles for Epistemic Activism.” Topoi.

Mills, Charles. 2007. “White Ignorance.” In Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance, edited by Nancy Tuana and Shannon Sullivan, 26–31. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Mitova, Veli. 2020. “Decolonising Knowledge Here and Now.” Philosophical Papers 49 (2): 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2020.1779606.

Nagel, Jennifer. 2017. “Comments on The Internet of Us: Knowing More and Understanding Less in the Age of Big Data.” Presented at the APA Pacific Division Meeting, Seattle, Washington.

Pohlhaus Jr., Gaile. 2012. “Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance.” Hypatia 27 (4): 715–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01222.x.

Ridder, Jeroen de. 2022. “Online Illusions of Understanding.” Social Epistemology, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2151331.

Tobi, Abraham T. 2020. “Towards A Plausible Account of Epistemic Decolonisation.” Philosophical Papers 49 (2): 253–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2020.1779602.

Publicado
01-09-2024
Cómo citar
Frost-Arnold, K. (2024). Response to Comments. Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia, (93), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.620301
Número
Sección
MONOGRÁFICO sobre «Diversidad y deliberación en entornos digitales». Simposio sobre Who Should We be Online (OUP, 2023) de Karen Frost-Arnold