Scratching where it doesn’t itch: science denialism, expertise, and the probative value of scientific consensus

Claudio Javier Cormick; Valeria Edelsztein

doi:10.6018/daimon.558391

Auteurs

Claudio Javier Cormick IIF-SADAF/CONICET https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0162-2429
Valeria Edelsztein CEFIEC-FCEN-UBA/CONICET https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6739-1825

DOI : https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.558391

Mots-clés : scientific denialism

Résumé

In recent years, several strategies have been proposed to counteract scientific denialism, among which one of the most influential is that of Elizabeth Anderson, who argues that any lay person with access to the Internet and basic education can reliably assess the acceptability of various claims involving expert knowledge. In particular, the author shows that this procedure can be successfully applied to the case of anthropogenic global warming. In this article we will try to argue why, although Anderson's proposal is satisfactory in that particular case, it fails when applied to flat-Eartherism and anti-vaxxerism.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Métriques

Vues/Téléchargements

Résumé
48
PDF
30
HTML
9

Références

Almassi. (2012). Climate Change, Epistemic Trust, and Expert Trustworthiness. Ethics and the Environment, 17(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.17.2.29

Anderson, E. (2011). Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Tes-timony. Episteme, 8(2), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2011.0013

Björnberg, K. E., Karlsson, M., Gilek, M., & Hansson, S. O. (2017). Climate and environ- mental science denial: A review of the scientific literature published in 1990–2015. Jour- nal of Cleaner Production, 167, 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.066

Cook, J. (2019). Understanding and countering misinformation about climate change.

Cowie, S. (2019, November 6). Brazil’s flat Earthers to get their day in the sun. The Guardian.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/06/brazil-flat-earth-conference-terra-plana

Czarnek, G., & Kossowska, M. (2023). Strong correlational but no causal evidence on the link between the perception of scientific consensus and support for COVID-19 vaccination [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yufmp

de Oliveira, I. S., Cardoso, L. S., Ferreira, I. G., Alexandre-Silva, G. M., Jacob, B. de C. da S., Cerni, F. A., Monteiro, W. M., Zottich, U., & Pucca, M. B. (2022). Anti-vaccination movements in the world and in Brazil. Revista Da Sociedade Bra-sileira de Medicina Tropical, 55, e0592-2021. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0592-2021

Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011). Sup-port for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scien-tific agreement. Nature Climate Change, 1(9), 462–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1295

Dubé, E., Gagnon, D., MacDonald, N. E., & SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesi-tancy. (2015). Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of pub-lished reviews. Vaccine, 33(34), 4191–4203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.041

Edelsztein, V., & Cormick, C. (forthcoming). Análisis del movimiento antivacunas en Twit- ter: Una perspectiva latinoamericana. JCOM-América Latina.

Evrony, A., & Caplan, A. (2017). The overlooked dangers of anti-vaccination groups’ social media presence. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 13(6), 1475–1476. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1283467

Friedman, J. (2017). The Problem of Epistocratic Identification and the (Possibly) Dys-functional Division of Epistemic Labor. Critical Review, 29(3), 293–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1410979

Gardel, L. (2020, September 23). ¿Quiénes son los Médicos por la Verdad y los Epide-miólogos Argentinos? Chequeado. https://chequeado.com/el-explicador/quienes-son-los-medicos-por-la-verdad-y-los-epidemiologos-argentinos-los-2-grupos-que-difunden-desinformaciones-sobre-el-coronavirus/

Global Warming Petition Project. (2007). http://www.petitionproject.org

Goldenberg, M. J. (2021). Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, And The War On Science (1st Edition). University Of Pittsburgh Press. http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=6DB5FD18AA542B58933A63041C4FF1C5

Goldman, A. I. (2001). Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/3071090

Gross, L. (2009). A Broken Trust: Lessons from the Vaccine–Autism Wars. PLOS Biology, 7(5), e1000114. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000114

Haerlin, B., & Parr, D. (1999). How to restore public trust in science. Nature, 400(6744), 499–499. https://doi.org/10.1038/22867

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2015). Measuring Laypeople’s Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI). PLOS ONE, 10(10), e0139309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139309

Hobson-West, P. (2007). ‘Trusting blindly can be the biggest risk of all’: Organised resis- tance to childhood vaccination in the UK. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(2), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00544.x

Ingold, J. (2018, November 20). We went to a flat-Earth convention and found a lesson about the future of post- truth life. 18.

Inhofe, J. (2003). Sen. Inhofe Delivers Major Speech on the Science of Climate Change “Catastrophic global warming alarmism not based on objective science.” U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2003/7/post-037e5dea-9c4e-4b92-a416-4a6bf6cfd7ef

Kata, A. (2012). Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine, 30(25), 3778–3789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112

Kerr, J. & Sander van der Linden. (2021). Communicating expert consensus increases personal support for COVID‐19 mitigation policies. J Appl Soc Psychol, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12827

Levy, N. (2021). Bad Beliefs: Why They Happen to Good People (1st ed.). Oxford Uni-versity Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192895325.001.0001

Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., & Lloyd, E. (2018). The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: Simulating coherence by conspiracism. Synthese, 195(1), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1198-6

Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2013). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), Ar-ticle 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1720

Longino, H. (2019). The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/scientific-knowledge-social/

Maldita.es. (2021). The International Scheme of “Doctors for the Truth”: A Denialist Trademark Registered by Natalia Prego. Chequeado. https://chequeado.com/investigaciones/the-international-scheme-of-doctors-for-the-truth-a-denialist-trademark-registered-by-natalia-prego/

Mallapaty, S. (2021). Researchers fear growing COVID vaccine hesitancy in developing nations. Nature, 601(7892), 174–175. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-03830-7

McIntyre, L. (2021). How to talk to a science denier: Conversations with flat earthers, climate deniers, and others who defy reason. MIT Press.

Micheletto, K. (2021, May 31). Quiénes son y qué hay detrás de los grupos negacionis-tas de la cuarentena | “Médicos por la verdad” que siempre es de derecha. PAGINA12. https://www.pagina12.com.ar/344966-quienes-son-y-que-hay-detras-de-los-grupos-negacionistas-de-

Olshansky, A. (2018). Conspiracy Theorizing and Religious Motivated Reasoning: Why the Earth ‘Must’ Be Flat.

Olshansky, A., Peaslee, R. M., & Landrum, A. R. (2020). Flat-Smacked! Converting to Flat Eartherism. Journal of Media and Religion, 19(2), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2020.1774257

Omer, S. B. (2020). The discredited doctor hailed by the anti-vaccine movement. Na-ture, 586(7831), 668–669. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02989-9

Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scien-tists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change (Re-print edition). Bloomsbury Publishing.

Rao, T. S. S., & Andrade, C. (2011). The MMR vaccine and autism: Sensation, refuta- tion, retraction, and fraud. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(2), 95–96. https://doi. org/10.4103/0019-5545.82529

Roach, A., & Clifton, K. (2020, September 19). Covid skeptics and anti-vaxxers clash with police at London protest. Evening Standard. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/ trafalgar-square-protest-london-coronavirus-a4551266.html

Sargent, M. (Director). (2015, February 12). FLAT EARTH Clues Part 1—Empty Theatre— Mark Sargent. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFYaT-U82JY

Strozewski, Z. (2021, October 26). 10 percent of Americans don’t believe in climate change, 15 percent unsure: Poll. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/10-percent-americans- dont-believe-climate-change-15-percent-unsure-poll-1642747

The Royal Society, & The British Academy. (2020). COVID-19 vaccine deployment: Behav- iour, ethics, misinformation and policy strategies.

To 11 million Brazilians, the Earth is flat. (2020, February 28). France 24. https://www. france24.com/en/20200228-to-11-million-brazilians-the-earth-is-flat

van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change as a Gateway Belief: Experimental Evidence. PLOS ONE, 10(2), e0118489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118489

Wolfe, R. M., & Sharp, L. K. (2002). Anti-vaccinationists past and present. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 325(7361), 430–432.