Exactly, what do you mean?

Manuel Almagro Holgado; Neftalí Villanueva

doi:10.6018/daimon.482231

Autores/as

Manuel Almagro Holgado Universidad de Granada
Neftalí Villanueva Universidad de Granada

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.482231

Palabras clave: Lenguaje evaluativo, Discurso ofensivo, Actitudes afectivas, Contexto-dependencia, Contenido expresivo

Resumen

El propósito de este trabajo es explorar los límites de un subconjunto de los usos evalua-tivos del lenguaje: el discurso ofensivo. Nuestro objetivo es doble. Primero, introducimos la rela-ción que hay entre el contexto y las proferencias evaluativas, tal y como puede rastrearse en la literatura reciente acerca de la cuestión. Segundo, nos centramos en el estudio experimental de una interacción particular entre la información contextual y nuestras afirmaciones evaluativas: cuándo el contexto es capaz de convertir una pro-ferencia aparentemente descriptiva en una evalua-tiva. Para este segundo propósito, argumentamos, ciertas propuestas positivas recientes, a pesar de su mérito, son insuficientes.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Abbott, B. (2006), Where have some of the presuppositions gone, in: Birner, B. & Ward, G. (eds): Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, Amsterdam: Studies in Language Companion Series, pp. 1–20.

Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015), “Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?”, Psychological Science, 26 (10), pp. 1531–1542. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620

Carothers, T., & O’Donohue, A. (2019), Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. Brookings Institution Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctvbd8j2p

Carruthers, P. (2011), The Opacity of Mind: An Integrative Theory of Self-Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cepollaro, B. (2015), “In defense of a presuppositional account of slurs”, Language Sciences, 52, pp. 36-45.

Cepollaro, B. (2016), “Building evaluation into language”, Phenomenology and Mind, 11, pp. 158-168.

Cepollaro, B. (2017a), “The shortcut of discrimination”, Rivista di Estetica, 64, pp. 53-65.

Cepollaro, B. (2017b), The Semantics and Pragmatics of Slurs and Thick Terms. Doctoral Thesis, Paris: PSL Research University.

Cepollaro, B. & Stojanovic, I. (2016), “Hybrid evaluatives: In defense of a presuppositional account”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 93 (3), pp. 458-488.

Cepollaro, B., Sulpizio, S. & Bianchi, C. (2018), “How bad is it to report a slur? An empirical investigation”, Journal of Pragmatics, 146, pp. 32-42.

Cepollaro, B. & Zeman, D. (2020), “The Challenge from Non-Derogatory Uses of Slurs”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 97, pp. 1-10.

Cepollaro, B., Soria, A. & Stojanovic, I. (2021), The semantics and pragmatics of value judgments, in: Stalmaszczyk, P. (ed.): The Cambridge Handbook of Philosophy of Language, ch. 24, Cambridge University Press.

Corredor, C. (2014), Pejoratives and social interaction, in: Stalmaszczyk, P. (ed.): Issues in Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, Łódź Studies in English and General Linguistics 2.

Copp, D. (2009), Realist-expressivism and conventional implicature, in: R. Shafer- Landau (ed.): Oxford studies in metaethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 167–202.

Edwards, P. & Roberts, I. (2008), “Finding long-term solutions to the world food crisis”, The Lancet, 371 (9622), p. 1389.

Field, H. (2009), “Epistemology without metaphysics”, Philosophical Studies, 143(2), pp. 249–290.

Field, H. (2018), “Epistemology from an evaluativist perspective”, Philosophers’ Imprint, 18(2), pp. 1-23.

Gibbard, A. (2012), Meaning and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gibson, J. L., Epstein, L. & Magarian, G. (2019), “Taming Uncivil Discourse”, Political Psychology, doi: 10.1111/pops.12626

Gutzman, D. (2011), Expressive Modifiers & Mixed Expressives, in: Bonami, O. & Hofherr, P. (eds): Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8, pp. 123–141.

Kappel, K. (2016), “Fact-Dependent Policy Disagreements and Political Legitimacy”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20, pp. 313–331

Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018), How democracies die (First edition). Crown.

Macià, J. (2002), “Presuposición y significado expresivo”, Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 3 (45), pp. 499-513.

McCready, E. (2010), “Varieties of Conventional Implicature”, Semantics and Pragmatics 3 (8), pp. 1–57.

McNally, L. & Stojanovic, I. (2017), Aesthetic adjectives, in: Young, J., (ed.): The Semantics of Aesthetic Judgment. Oxford University Press.

McCready, E. (2010), “Varieties of conventional implicature”, Semantics and Pragmatics, 3 (8), pp. 1-57.

Moreno, A. & Pérez-Navarro, E. (Manuscrito), Beyond the conversation: Why slurs are always dangerous.

Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. (1977), “Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes”, Psychological Review, 84 (3), pp. 231–259.

Potts, C. (2005), The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Public Health England (08, 2020). Disparities in the risk and outcomes of COVID-19. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/908434/Disparities_in_the_risk_and_outcomes_of_COVID_August_2020_update.pdf

Rankine, C. (2014), Citizen. An American Lyric. Graywolf Press.

Saul, J. (2018), Dogwhistles, political manipulation and philosophy of language, in: Fogal, D., Will-Harris, D. (eds.): New Works on Speech Acts, Oxford University Press, pp. 360–383.

Schmidt, H. (2008), “Transport policy, food policy, obese people, and victim blaming”, The Lancet, 372 (9622), p. 627

Simko, V. & Ginter E. (2010), “Short life expectancy and metabolic syndrome in Romanies (gypsies) in Slovakia”, National Center for Biotechnology Information, 18 (1), pp. 16-8.

Stanley, J. (2015), How Propaganda Works. Princeton University Press.

Stenner, A. J. (1981), A note on logical truth and non-sexist semantics, in: Vetterling-Braggin, M. (ed.): Sexist Language: A Modern Philosophical Analysis, New York: Littlefield, Adams & Co, pp. 299-306.

Sunstein, C. (2017), #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press: Princeton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884711

Schwitzgebel, E. (2008), “The Unreliability of Naïve Introspection”, Philosophical Review, 117, pp. 245–273.

Schwitzgebel, E. (2011), Perplexities of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Väyrynen, P. (2013), The lewd, the rude and the nasty: A study of thick concepts in ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Vicario, M. D., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016), “The spreading of misinformation online”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113 (3), pp. 554– 559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113

Whiting, D. (2007), “Inferentialism, representationalism and derogatory words”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 15 (2), pp. 191-205.

Whiting, D. (2013), “It’s not what you said, it’s the way you said it: Slurs and conventional implicatures”, Analytic Philosophy, 54 (3), pp. 364-377.

Williamson, T. (2009), Reference, inference, and the semantics of pejoratives, in: Almog, J. & Leonardi, P. (eds.): The Philosophy of David Kaplan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137-159.

Wilson, T. (2002), Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Zajonc, R. (2001), “Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10 (6), pp. 224–228.