Concepção e validação de uma escala para a medição do estilo motivacional dos professores.
Escala observacional de estilo motivacional
Resumo
A metodologia observacional permite-nos analisar o estilo motivacional que os professores exibem na aula e fornece uma nova perspectiva para interpretar a influência das interacções dos professores no processo instrucional. O objectivo deste trabalho era conceber uma escala de estimativa ad hoc para a Medida de Estilo de Ensino Interpessoal (MEID) e validá-la. Trinta professores universitários (16 mulheres e 14 homens) com uma idade média de 46,1 anos (SD = 5,8) e com uma experiência de ensino de 15,71 anos (SD = 6,9) participaram no estudo. A qualidade dos dados foi conseguida através da técnica de validade do conteúdo através do julgamento de peritos e o aspecto quantitativo foi tratado através da análise W de Kendall, encaixando um modelo final de 60 itens agrupados em 4 dimensões exaustivas e mutuamente exclusivas: suporte de autonomia, suporte de estrutura pré-tarefa, suporte de estrutura na tarefa, e suporte de relacionamento. A evidência inicial da escala MEID apresenta-a como um instrumento psicométrico robusto e fiável para ser utilizado como uma técnica de observação do estilo de ensino interpessoal. Os resultados obtidos abrem novas linhas de estudo nas quais a escala MEID poderia ser utilizada em programas de formação destinados a optimizar os padrões motivacionais adaptativos nos professores.
Downloads
Referências
Abós, A., Sevil, J., Martín-Albo, L., Julián, J.A., y García-González, L. (2018). An integrative framework to validate the need-supportive teaching style scale (NSTSS) in secondary teachers through exploratory structural equation modeling. Contemporay Educational Psychology, 52, 48-60. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.001
Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L., Soenens, B., Fontaine, J.R.J., y Reeve, J. (2018). Toward an integrative and fine-grained insight in motivating and demotivating teachin styles: the merits of a circumplex approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 497-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000293
Aguado-Gómez, R., Díaz-Cueto, M., Hernández-Álvarez, J.L., y López-Rodríguez, A. (2016). Apoyo a la autonomía en las clases de educación física: percepción versus realidad. Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, 16(62), 183-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.15366/rimcafd2016.62.001
Anguera, M. T. (1990). Metodología observacional. En J. Arnau, M. T. Anguera y J. Gómez. Metodología de la investigación en Ciencias del Comportamiento (pp. 125-236). Murcia: Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia.
Anguera, M.T., Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Hernández-Mendo, A. y Losada, J.L. (2011). Diseños Observacionales: ajuste y aplicación en psicología del deporte. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 11(2) 63-76. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1578-84232015000100002
Anguera, M.T., Camerino, O., Castañer, M., y Sánchez-Algarra (2014): Mixed Methods en la investigación de la actividad física y el deporte. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 23(1), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1578-84232015000100008
Anguera, M.T., y Hernández-Mendo, A. (2013). La metodología observacional en el ámbito del deporte. E-balonmano.com: Revista de Ciencias del Deporte 9(3), 135-160. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1578-84232015000100002
Anguera, M.T., y Hernández-Mendo, A. (2014): Técnicas de análisis en estudios observacionales en ciencias del deporte. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 15(1) 13-30. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1578-84232015000100002
Anguera, M.T., Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Losada, J.L., y Hernández-Mendo, A. (2000). Metodología observacional en psicología en el deporte: conceptos básicos. Lecturas: EF y Deportes. Revista Digital, 24, agosto 2000. http://www.efdeportes.com/efd24b/obs.htm [Consulta: 10 de octubre de 2000].
Anguera. M.T., Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Losada, J.L., y Portell, M (2018). Pautas para elaborar trabajos que utilizan la metodología observacional. Anuario de psicología, 14(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpsic.2018.02.001
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., y Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teaching behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158883
Cheon, S. H., y Reeve, J. (2013). Do the benfits from autonomy-supportive PE teacher training programs endure? A one-year follow-up investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 508-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.02.002
Cheon, S. H., y Reeve, J. (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers to decrease students’ amotivation. Contemporanean Educational Psychology, 40, 99-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.004
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., y Moon, I. S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their studens. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 365-396. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.3.365
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., y Ntoumanis, N. (2018). A needs-supportive intervention to help PE teachers enhance students' prosocial behavior and diminish antisocial behavior. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 35, 74-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.11.010
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., y Song (2016). A teacher focused intervention to decrease PE students’ amotivation by increasing need satisfaction and decreasing need fustration. Journal of Sport and Exercise, 38(3), 217-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0236
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Yu, T. H., y Jang, H. R. (2014). The teacher benefits from giving autonomy support during physical education instruction. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36(4), 331-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0231
Davis, W. (2018). What makes a learning experience intrinsically motivating for american high school language learners? Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2(3), 167-180.
Escobar-Pérez, J., y Cuervo-Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, 6(1), 27-36.
Griffin, W. (2016). Perceived autonomy support, intrinsic motivation, and students ratings of instruction. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 51, 116-125. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.stuedduc.2016.10.007
Gunuc, S. (2014). The relationships between student engagement and their academic achievement. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implication, 5 (4), 216-231. DOI: 10.5539/ass.v15n11p1
Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Van der Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., Soenens, B., y Vansteenkiste, M. (2013). Observing physical education teacher’s need-supportive interactions in classroom settings. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 35, 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.35.1.3
Haerens, L., Vanstennkiste, M., Aelterman, N., y Van den Berghe, L. (2016). Toward a systematic study of the dark side of the student motivation: Antecedents and consequences of teachers’ controlling behaviours. En W. Liu, J. Keng y R. Ryan (Eds.), Building Autonomous Learnes. Perspectives from reseach and practice using self-determination theory (pp. 59-81). Singapore: Springer.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., y Deci, E. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
Jang, H., Reeve, J., y Halusic, M. (2016). A new Autonomy-Supportive way of teaching that increases conceptual learning: Teaching in student’s preferents ways. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1083522
Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., y Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically-oriented South Korean adolescents? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 644-661. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014241
Krijgsman, C., Mainhard, T., van Tarwijk, J., Borghouts, L., Vansteenkiste, M. Aelterman, N., y Haerens, L. (2019): Where to go and how to get there: Goal clarification, process feedback and students’ need satisfaction and frustration from lesson to lesson. Learning and Instruction, 61, 1-11. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.005
Jiang, J., Vauras, M., Volet, S., Salo, A., y Kajamies, A. (2019): Autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching in the classroom: a video-based case study. Education Sciences, 9(3), 229, http://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030229
León, J., Medina-Garrido, E., y Ortega, M. (2018). Teaching quality: high school students’ autonomy and competence. Psicothema, 30(2), 218-223. doi:10.7334/psicothema2017.23
Meng, H., Wang, J., y Keng, C. (2016). The effectiveness of an autonomy-supportive teaching structure in physical education. RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 43(12), 5-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2016.04301
Moreno-Murcia, J. A. (2016). Supported teaching autonomy support. RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 12(43), 2-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2015.043ed
Moreno-Murcia, J.A., y Sánchez-Latorre, F. (2016). Efectos del soporte de autonomía en clases de educación física. RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 43, 79-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2016.04305
Nuñez, J., y León, J. (2016). The mediating effect of the intrinsic motivation to learn on the relationship between student’s autonomy support and vitality and Deep learning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, e42, 1-18. http://doi.101017/sjp.2016.43
Portney, L. G., y Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company.
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159175. doi:10.1080/00461520 903028990.
Reeve, J., y Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support Students’ Autonomy during a Learning Activity (2006). Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, H., Jeon, S., y Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
Reeve, J., & Tseng, M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of student engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ahmad, I., Cheon, S. H., Jang, H.;…Wang, C. K. J. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 93-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1988.6.3-4.293
Reguant-Álvarez, M., y Torrado-Fonseca, M. (2016). El método Delphi. REIRE. Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 9(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2016.9.1916
Rouse, P. C., Duda, J. L., Ntoumanis, N., Jolly, K., y Williams, G. C. (2016). The development and valitacion of the interpersonal support in physical activity consultations observational tool. European Journal of Sport Sciencie, 16(1), 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.987320
Ryan, R. M., y Deci, E. L., (2000). Self-determination Theory and the facilitation of the intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. 10.1037//003-066x.55.1.68
Sarrazin, Tessier, Pelletier, Trouilloud, D. y Chanal, J. (2006). The Effects of Teachers’ Expectations about Students’ Motivation On Teachers Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling Behaviors. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2006.9671799
Schmidt, R. (1997). Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 763-774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x
Smith, N., Quested, E., Appleton, P., y Duda, J. (2016). A review of observational instruments to assess the motivational environment in sport and physical education settings. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 9(1), 134-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2015.1132334
Skinner, E., Kindermann, T., Connell, J., y Wellborn, J. (2009): Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational developement. En K. R. Wenzel y A. Wigfield (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223-245). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Smith, N., Tessier, D., Tzioumakis, Y., Quested, E., Appleton, P., Sarrazin, P., Papaioannou, A., y Duda, J. (2015). Developement and validation of the multidimensional motivational climate observation system (MMCOS). Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 37, 4-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2014-0059
Soenens, B., y Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in 3 life domains: the role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(6), 589-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8948-y
Tessier, D., Sarrazin, P., y Ntoumanis, N. (2008). The effects of an experimental programme to support student’s autonomy on the overt behaviours of physical education teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 3, 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172998
Wallace, T. L., Kelcey, B., y Ruzek, E. A. (2016). What can student perception surveys tell us about teaching? Empirically testing the underlying structure of the tripod student perception survey. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1834-1868. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216671864
Zang, T., Solmon, M., Kosma, M., Carson, R., y Gu, X (2011): Need suport, need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and physical activity participation among middle school students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.30.1.51
- 03-01-2022 (5)
- 03-01-2022 (4)
- 03-01-2022 (3)
- 03-01-2022 (2)
- 03-01-2022 (1)
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
