Evaluación adaptativa informatizada del clima organizacional
Agencias de apoyo
- Department of Public Administration of the Government of the Principality of Asturias (FUO-EM-305-06) and Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PSI 2011-28638)
- and the Government of the Principality of Asturias
Resumen
Los Tests Adaptativos Informatizados (CAT) constituyen un gran avance en el campo de la evaluación de las ciencias sociales y de la salud. Es interesante incorporar este desarrollo metodológico al campo de la psicología organizacional. El objetivo de esta investigación es desarrollar un CAT para evaluar el clima organizacional. Para ello, se construyó un banco de 160 ítems, que se administró a una muestra de 3163 trabajadores (M = 51,90 años; SD = 6,28 años). Los resultados muestran que el CAT funciona de manera eficiente para los tres bancos de ítems utilizados (150, 130 y 50 artículos). La función de la información muestra que el rasgo latente se mide con una precisión similar en todo el rango de valores. La correlación entre las puntuaciones obtenidas con el CAT, los tres bancos de ítems y la escala CLIOR de clima organizacional fue superior a 0,90 en todos los casos (SE <0,32). Con una precisión fiajada en SE <0,32, el CAT de 150 ítems utiliza una media de 22,5 ítems (SD = 22,5). El CAT desarrollado permite una evaluación útil y precisa del clima organizacional en contextos organizacionales.
Descargas
Citas
Aguado, D., Rubio, V.J., & Haley, S.M. (2005). Propiedades psicométricas de un test adaptativo informatizado para la medición del ajuste emocional [Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment computerized adaptive test]. Psicothema, 17(3), 484-491.
Allen, D.D., Ni, P., & Haley, S.M. (2008). Efficiency and sensitivity of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of pediatric physical functioning. Disability and rehabilitation, 30, 479-484.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Andrich, D. (1978). A rating scale formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
Asif, F. (2011). Estimating the impact of Denison’s (1996), "What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Journal of Business Research, 64, 454-459.
Bartram, D., Robertson, I.T., & Callinan, M. (2002). A framework for examining organizational effectiveness. In I.T. Robertson, M. Callinan, & D. Bartram (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness: The role of psychology (pp. 1-10). Chichester, UK: Wiley and Sons.
Bjorner, J.B., Chang, C., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality Life Research, 16, 95-108..
Carr, J.Z., Schmidt, A.M., Ford, J.K., & DeShon, R.P. (2003). Climate perceptions matter: A meta-analytic path analysis relating molar climate, cognitive and affective states, and individual level work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 605-619.
Cella, D., Gershon, R., Lai, J.S., & Choi, S. (2007). The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality Life Research, 16, 133-141.
Cheng, Y., Luh, W.M., & Guo, Y.L. (2003). Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Job Content Questionnaire (C-JCQ) in Taiwanese Workers International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 15-30.
Chien, T.W., Lai, W., Lu, Ch., Wang, W., Chen, S., Wang, H., & Su, S. (2011). Web-based computer adaptive assessment of individual perceptions of job satisfaction for hospital workplace employees. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 1-8.
Chien, T.W., Wu, H.M., Wang, W.C., Castillo, R.V., & Chou, W. (2009). Reduction in patient burdens with graphical computerized adaptive testing on the ADL scale: tool development and simulation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 7-39. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-39.
Chien, T.W., Wang, W.C., Wang, H.Y., & Lin, H.J. (2009). Online assessment of patients’ views on hospital performances using Rasch model’s KIDMAP diagram. 9. BMC Health Services Research, 31, 135.
Cole, L.L., Grubb, P.L., Sauter, S.L., Swanson, N.G., & Lawless, P. (1997). Psychosocial correlates of harassment, threats and fear of violence in the workplace. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 23, 450-457.
Corral, S., & Pereña, J. (2010). Cuestionario de clima laboral. Manual [Work Climate Questionnaire. Manual] (2a ed.). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Cummings, L.L., & deCotiis, T.A. (1973). Organizational correlates of perceived stress in a professional organization. Public Personnel Management, 2, 275-282.
deCotiis, T.A., & Summers, T.P. (1987). A path analysis of a model of the antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment. Human Relations, 40, 445-470.
Delgado-Rico, E., Carretero-Dios, H., & Ruch, W. (2012). Content validity evidences in test development: an applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12, 449-460.
Denison, D.R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 619-654.
Downing, S.M., & Haladyna, T.M. (2006). Handbook of test development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105-123.
Fernández-Ballesteros., R., & Sierra, B (1984). Escalas de clima social: familia, trabajo, instituciones penitenciarias, centro escolar. Manual: investigación y publicaciones psicológicas [Social climate scales: Family, work, penitentiary institutions, school. Manual: Research and psychological publications]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Menéndez, F.L., Paino, M., Lemos-Giráldez, S., & Muñiz, J. (2013). Development of a Computerized Adaptive Test for Schizotypy Assessment. PLoS ONE 8(9), e73201.
González-Romá, V., Tomás, I., Peiró, J.M., Lloret, S., Espejo, B., Ferreres, D., & Hernández, A. (1996). Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario de clima organizacional FOCUS-93 [Analysis of the psychometric properties of the organizational climate questionnaire FOCUS-93]. Revista de Psicología Social Aplicada, 6, 5-22.
Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Kupfer, D. J., Frank, E., Fagiolini, A., Grochocinski, V. J., . . . Immekus, J. C. (2008). Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59(4), 361-368.
Haladyna, T.M. (2004). Developing and validating multiple-choice test item (3 rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Hambleton, R. K. (1989). Principles and Selected applications of item response theory. In R. L. Linn (Ed), Educational measurement (pp.147-200). New York, McMillan.
James, L.R., Choi, C.C., Ko, C.E., McNeil, P.K., Minton, M.K., Wright, M.A., & Kim, K. (2008). Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17, 5-32.
Jette, A.M., Haley, S.M., Ni, P., Olarsch, S., & Moed, R. (2008). Creating a Computer Adaptive Test Version of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument. The Journals of Gerontology, 63, 1246-1256.
Jones, A.P., & James, L.R. (1979). Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 201-250.
Kopec, J.A., Badii, M., McKenna , M., Lima, V.D., Sayre, E.C., & Dvorak, M. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: validation of the CAT-5DQOL. Spine, 33, 1384-1390.
Lazarus, R.S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. The American Psychologist, 37, 1019-1024.
Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer-Verlag.
López-Fernández, L.A., Sánchez-Cantilejo, E., Calzas-Urrutia, D., Siles- Román, D., Sevilla-García, E., & de Oleaga-Usategui, I. (1988). Elaboración de un cuestionario para el estudio del clima organizacional de los centros de salud [Elaboration of a questionnaire to study the organizational climate of health centers]. Atención Primaria, 5(10), 531-535.
Lord, F. (1990). Applications of Item Response Theory to practical testing problems: Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Martin, M., Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J.B., Ware, J.E., Maclean, R., & Li, T. (2007). Item response theory methods can improve the measurement of physical function by combining the modified health assessment questionnaire and the SF-36 physical function scale. Quality Life Research, 16, 647-660.
Martínez-Arias, R. (1995). Psicometría: teoría de los tests psicológicos y educativos [Psychometrics: theory of psychological and educational tests]. Madrid, Síntesis.
Moreno, R., Martínez, R., & Muñiz, J. (2006). New guidelines for developing multiple-choice items. Methodology, 2, 65-72.
Muñiz, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2008). Construcción de instrumentos de medida para la evaluación universitaria [Developing measurement instruments for university assessment]. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 5, 13-25
Muñiz, J., Peña-Suárez, E., de la Roca, Y., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Cabal, A.L., García-Cueto, E. (2014). Organizational climate in Spanish Public Health Services: Administration and Services Staff. International Journal of Clinical and Health, Psychology, 14, 102-110.
Ostroff, C. (1993). The effects of climate and personal influences on individual behavior and attitudes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 56-90.
Ostroff, C., Kinicky, A., & Tamkins, M.M. (2003). Organizational culture and climate. In W.C. Borman, D.R. Ilgen, & R.J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 12 Industrial and Organizational). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons.
Peña-Suárez, E., Muñiz, J., Campillo-Álvarez, A., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., & García-Cueto, E. (2013). Assessing organizational climate: Psychometric properties of CLIOR scale. Psicothema, 24, 137-144.
Petersen, M.A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N., Fayers, P., Sprangers, M., & Bjorner, J.B. (2006). Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30: basic developments and evaluations. Quality Life Research, 15, 315-329.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rebollo, P., Castejón, I. , Cuervo, J., Villa, G., García-Cueto, E., Díaz-Cuervo, E., . . . Alonso, J. (2010). Validation of a computer-adaptive test to evaluate generic health-related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 147.
Reckase, M. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 207-230.
Revicki, D.A., & Cella, D.F. (1997). Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing. Quality Life Research, 6, 595-600.
Rojas-Tejada, A. J., & Pérez-Meléndez, G. (2001). Nuevos modelos para la medición de actitudes. [New models for measuring attitudes]. Valencia: Promolibro.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph 17.
Samejima, F. (1974). Normal ogive model for the continuous response level in the multidimensional latent space. Psychometrika, 39, 111-121.
Smits, N., Cuijpers, P., & van Straten, A. (2011). Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: A simulation study. Psychiatry Research, 188, 147-155.
Schnake, M.E. (1983). An empirical assessment of the effects of affective response in the measurement of organizational climate. Personnel Psychology, 36, 791-807.
Steel, R.P., Shane, G.S., & Kennedy, K.A. (1990). Effects of social system factors on absenteeism, turnover, and job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4, 423-430.
Thissen, D. (1991). MULTILOG, multiple categorical item analysis and test scoring using Item Response Theory [Computer program]. Chicago, Scientific Software Inc.
Thumin, F.J., & Thumin, L.J. (2011). The measurement and interpretation of organizational climate. The Journal of Psychology, 145, 93-109.
Van der Linden, W. J. and C. A. W. Glas, Eds. (2001). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Vartia, M. (2008). The sources of bullying: Psychological work environment and organizational climate. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 203-214.
Wainer, H.W., Dorans, N.J., Flaugher, R., Green, B.F., Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Walter, O.B., Becker, J., Bjorner, J.B., Fliege, H., Klapp, B.F., & Rose, M. (2007). Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for ‘Anxiety’ (Anxiety-CAT). Quality Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 143-155.
Walter, O. B. (2010). Adaptive Tests for measuring Anxiety and Depression. In W. J. van der Linden and A. W. G. Cees (Ed), Elements of Adaptive Testing, Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp.123-136). New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London, Springer.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2024
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
