Flexibilidad cognitiva y bienestar mental en adolescentes turcos: El papel mediador de la autoeficacia académica, social y emocional
Resumen
La adolescencia es una etapa crítica de crecimiento y desarrollo en el ciclo de vida de un individuo. Debido a la importancia del éxito en el desarrollo durante esta etapa, con implicaciones del desarrollo adulto y la salud mental positiva, el presente estudio tiene como objetivo examinar los roles predictores de la flexibilidad cognitiva y la autoeficacia en el bienestar mental de los adolescentes turcos. Además, dado que se considera que la asociación entre la flexibilidad cognitiva y la autoeficacia tiene efectos cru-ciales en el bienestar mental de los adolescentes, se suponía que la autoefi-cacia académica, social y emocional podría mediar la relación entre la flexi-bilidad cognitiva y el bienestar mental. . Los participantes de la investiga-ción están compuestos por 192 mujeres (49 %) y 200 hombres (51 %), Un total de 392 estudiantes de secundaria que asistían a cuatro escuelas secun-darias diferentes se inscribieron en los grados 9-12, en una ciudad de Tur-quía. El Inventario de Flexibilidad Cognitiva, la Escala de Autoeficacia para Niños y la Escala de Bienestar Mental Warwick-Edinburgh se aplicaron en la recolección de datos. Los resultados mostraron que la flexibilidad cogni-tiva se correlacionó positivamente con las subdimensiones de autoeficacia y bienestar mental. Además, las subdimensiones de autoeficacia se correla-cionan positivamente con el bienestar mental. Los resultados del modelo mediacional indicaron que la autoeficacia académica, social y emocional sirvió para mediar la relación entre la flexibilidad cognitiva y el bienestar mental. Los resultados de la investigación se discutieron a la luz de la litera-tura y se propusieron algunas sugerencias para expertos e investigadores en salud mental. El Inventario de Flexibilidad Cognitiva, la Escala de Autoefi-cacia para Niños y la Escala de Bienestar Mental Warwick-Edinburgh se aplicaron en la recolección de datos. Los resultados mostraron que la flexi-bilidad cognitiva se correlacionó positivamente con las subdimensiones de autoeficacia y bienestar mental. Además, las subdimensiones de autoefica-cia se correlacionan positivamente con el bienestar mental. Los resultados del modelo mediacional indicaron que la autoeficacia académica, social y emocional sirvió para mediar la relación entre la flexibilidad cognitiva y el bienestar mental. Los resultados de la investigación se discutieron a la luz de la literatura y se propusieron algunas sugerencias para expertos e inves-tigadores en salud mental.
Descargas
Citas
Ahn, A. J., Kim, B. S. K., & Park, Y. S. (2008). Asian cultural values gap, cognitive flexibility, coping strategies, and parent-child conflicts among Korean Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(4), 353–363. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.14.4.353
Akçay-Özcan, D., & Kıran-Esen, B. (2016). The investigation of adolescents’ cognitive flexibility and self efficacy. International Journal Of Eurasia Social Sciences, 7(24), 1-10.
Armum, P., & Chellappan, K. (2016). Social and emotional self-efficacy of adolescents: measured and analysed interdependencies within and across academic achievement level. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 21(3), 279-288. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2015.1067894
Arslan, G. (2018). Psychological maltreatment, social acceptance, social connectedness, and subjective well-being in adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 983-1001. doi: 10.1007/s10902-017-9856-z
Asıcı, E. & İkiz, F. (2015). A pathway to happiness: Cognitive flexibility. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Educational Faculty Journal, 1(35), 191-211.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1990). Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 48(187), 397-427.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Ed.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 154-196). New York: Guilford Publications.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 1206-1222.
Bandura, A., Pastorelli, C., Barbaranelli, C., & Caprara, G. V. (1999). Self-efficacy pathways to childhood depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 258–269. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.258
Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Gerbino, M., & Pastorelli, C. (2003). Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy in diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning. Child Development, 74(3), 769-782.
Baytemir, K. (2016). The mediation of interpersonal competence in the relationship between parent and peer attachment and subjective well-being in adolescence. Education and Science, 41(186), 69-91.
Bilgiç, R., & Bilgin, M. (2016). Analysis of the relationship between the cognitive flexibility levels and decision strategies in adolescents based on sex and education level. Uşak University Educational Research Journal, 2(2), 39-55.
Bilgin, M. (2009). Some variables predicting cognitive flexibility. Çukurova University Education Faculty Journal, 3(36), 142-157.
Bilgin, M. (2017). Relations to five factor personality model with cognitive flexibility in adolescents. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 16(62), 945-954.
Bing, Z. (2011). A relationship study on cognitive flexibility and school adaptation for the freshmen. (Unpublished master thesis, Hebei University, Baoding, China). https://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/1874542152/A7658266AA6D4846PQ/1?accountid=11054
Bloom, J. R., Stewart, S. L., Johnston, M., Banks, P., Fobair, P. (2001). Sources of support and the physical and mental well-being of young women with breast cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1512-1524.
Caprara, G.V., Regalia, C., & Bandura, A. (2002). Longitudinal impact of perceived self-regulatory efficacy on violent conduct. European Psychologist, 7, 63–69.
Caprara, G. V.,, Steca, P., Gerbino, M., Pacielloi, M., & Vecchio, G. M. (2006). Looking for adolescents' well-being: self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of positive thinking and happiness. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc., 15(1), 30-43.
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (2002). A developmental psychopathology perspective on adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(1), 6-20. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.70.1.6
Cicognani, E. (2011). Coping strategies with minor stressors in adolescence: relationships with social support, self-efficacy, and psychological well-being. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(3), 559–578.
Connolly, J. (1989). Social self-efficacy in adolescence: Relations with self-concept, social adjustment, and mental health. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science , 21(3), 258-269. doi: 10.1037/h0079809
Çakar, F. S., & Tagay, Ö. (2015). The mediating role of self-esteem: The effects of social support and subjective well-being on adolescents’ risky behaviors. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17, 859-876. doi: 10.12738/estp.2017.3.0024
Çelikkaleli, Ö. (2014). The relation between cognitive flexibility and academic, socialand emotional self-efficacy beliefs among adolescents. Education and Science, 39(176), 347-354.
Çikrıkci, Ö. (2018). The predictive roles of cognitive flexibility and error oriented motivation skills on life satisfaction. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 9(31), 717-727.
De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation in the mood–creativity link: Towards a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739-756.
Demirtaş, A. S., Baytemir, K., & Güllü, A. (2017). Hope and mental well-being in pedagogy formation students: The mediating role of constructive thinking. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(1), 317-331. doi: 10.17860/mersinefd.354636
Dennis, J. P., & Wal, J. S. V. (2010). The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 241–253. doi:10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4
Diener, E (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull, 95(3), 542–75.
Duy, B., & Yıldız, M. A. (2017). The mediating role of self-esteem in the relationship between optimism and subjective well-being, Current Psychology, doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9698-1
Eryılmaz, A., & Öğülmüş, S. (2011). Subjective well-being and big five personality model at adolescence. Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Faculty of Education Journal, 11(3), 189-203.
Erwin, R. (2014). "Adolescent development." in Desktop Guide to Quality Practice for Working with Youth in Confinement. National Partnership for Juvenile Services and Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from https://info.nicic.gov/dtg/node/10
Figueira-McDonough, J. (1998). Environment and interpretation: Voices of young people in poor inner-city neighborhoods. Youth & Society, 30(2), 123-163.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York, Mc Graw HIll.
Fu, F., & Chow, A. (2016) Traumatic exposure and psychological well-being: The moderating role of cognitive flexibility. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 22(1), 24-35. doi: 10.1080/15325024.2016.1161428
Gecas, V. (1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 291-316.
Gülüm, İ. V. & Dağ, İ. (2012). The Turkish adaptation, validity and reliability study of the Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire and the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 13, 216-223.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from www.processmacro.org/download.html
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Second Edition. New York: Guilford Press
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes, and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1-25.
Hermann, K. S., & Betz, N. E. (2004). Path models of the relationships of instrumentality and expressiveness to social self-efficacy, shyness, and depressive symptoms. Sex Roles, 51, 55-67.
Hirt, E. R., Devers, E. E., & McCrea, S. M. (2008). I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 214-230.
Huppert, F., & Whittington, J. (2003). Evidence for the independence of positive and negative well-being: Implications for quality of life assessment. Br J Health Psychol, 8, 107–122. doi: 10.1348/135910703762879246
Imtiaz, S., & Kamal, A. (2016). Rumination, optimism, and psychological well-being among the elderly: Self-compassion as a predictor. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 26(1), 32- 50.
Johnson, B. T. (2016). The relationship between cognitive flexibility, coping, and symptomatology in psychotherapy (Master's Thesis, Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, Wisconsin). Retrieved from e-Publications@Marquette
Kaptanbaş-Gürbüz, E., & Sezgin-Nartgün, Ş. (2018). Cognitive flexibility and self-efficacy levels of pedagogical formation program students. The Journal of International Social Research, 11(55), 628-640.
Kato, T. (2012). Development of the Coping Flexibility Scale: Evidence for the coping flexibility hypothesis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 14(4), 353–363. doi: 0.1037/a0027770
Keldal, G. (2015). Turkish Version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale: A validity and reliability study. The Journal of Happiness and Well-Being, 3(1), 103-115.
Keyes, C. L. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. J Consult Clin Psychol, 73, 539–548.
Khallad, Y., & Jabr, F. (2016). Effects of perceived social support and family demands on college students' mental well-being: A cross-cultural investigation. International Journal of Psychology, 51(5), 348-355. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12177
Li, T., & Feng, F. (2018). Goal content, well-being, and psychological needs satisfaction in Chinese adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 46, 541-550. doi: 10.2224/sbp.6831
Lin, Y. (2013). The effects of cognitive flexibility and openness to change on college students' academic performance (Master’s Thesis, Hebei University, China). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
López, M., Gabilondo, A., Codony, M., García-Forero, C., Vilagut, G., Castellví, P., Ferrer, M., & Alonso, J. (2013). Adaptation into Spanish of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well- Being Scale (WEMWBS) and preliminary validation in a student sample. Quality of Life Research, 22, 1099-1104.
Ma, Z., Zeng, W., & Ye, K. (2015). Gender differences in Chinese adolescents’ subjective well-being: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Psychological Reports: Sociocultural Issues in Psychology, 116(1), 311-321.
Martin, M. & Anderson, C. (1998). The Cognitive Flexibility Scale: three validity studies. Communication Reports, 11, 1-9. doi: 10.1080/08934219809367680.
Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76, 623–62.
McGeown, S. P., Putwain, D., Geijer Simpson, E., Boffey, E., Markham, J., & Vince, A. (2014). Predictors of adolescents' academic motivation: Personality, self-efficacy and adolescents' characteristics. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 278-286. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.022
McFarlane, A. H., Bellissimo, A., & Norman, G. R. (1995). The role of family and peers in social self-efficacy: Links to depression in adolescence. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 65(3), 402-410. doi: 10.1037/h0079655
McKay, M. T., & Andretta, J. R. (2017). Evidence for the psychometric validity, internal consistency and measurement invariance of Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale scores in Scottish and Irish adolescents. Pyschiatry Research, 255, 382-386. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.071
Meyer, B., & Kim, U. (2000). The inter-relationships among German adolescents’ self-efficacy, perception of home and school environment, and health. Poster presented at the 15th International Congress of the International Association for Cross Cultural Psychology (IACCP), Pultusk, Poland.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246-268. doi.org: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
Moeini, B., Shafii, F., Hidarnia, A., Babaii, G., Birashk, B., & Allahverdipour, H. (2008). Perceived stress, self-efficacy and its relations to psychological well-being status in Iranian male high school students. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 36, 257-266. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2008.36.2.257
Morrish, L., Rickard, N., Chin, T. C., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2018). Emotion regulation in adolescent well-being and positive education. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19 (5), 1543–1564.
Muris, P. (2001). A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23(3), 145-149. doi: 10.1023/A:1010961119608
Muris, P. (2002). Relationships between self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression in a normal adolescent sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 337-348.
Nordentoft, M. (2007). Prevention of suicide and attempted suicide in Denmark. Epidemiological studies of suicide and intervention studies in selected risk groups. Danish Medical Bulletin, 4, 306-69.
Offer, D. & Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (1992) Debunking three myths of adolescence: findings from recent research. Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 1003–1014.
Önen, A. S., & Koçak, C. (2015). The Effect of Cognitive Flexibility on Higher School Students’ Study Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(2), 2346-2350. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.680
Özbay, Y., Palancı, M., Kandemir, M. & Çakır, O. (2012). Prediction of subjective well-being of university students via self regulation, humour, social self-efficacy ans stress coping strategies. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 10(2), 341-345.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
Phillips, D. A., & Zimmerman, M. (1990). The developmental course of perceived competence and incompetence among competent children. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kolligian, Jr. (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 41-66). New Haven, CT, US: Yale University Press.
Rudolf, K. D. (2002). Gender differences in emotional responses to interpersonal stress during adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30(4), 3-13. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00383-4
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol, 52(1), 141– 66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013) Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson, Boston.
Tamir, M. (2009) What do people want to feel and why? Pleasure and utility in emotion regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 101-105.
Taş, D., Öztürk-Çopur, E., Ünlü, H., Tüzün, Z., & Özcebe, L. H. (2017). Quality of life and self-efficacy of adolescents with chronic health conditions. Dicle Medical Journal, 44(3), 257-265.
Telef, B. B., & Ergün, E. (2013). Self-efficacy as a predictor of high school students’ subjective well-being. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 6(3), 423-433. doi: 10.5578/keg.5955
Telef, B. B., & Karaca, R. (2011). Adolescents’s self-efficacy and psychological symptoms’ investigation. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 8(16), 499-518.
Telef, B. B., & Karaca, R. (2012). The Self-Efficacy Scale for Children: A validity and reliability study. Dokuz Eylül University Buca Education Faculty Journal, 32, 169 – 187.
Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., Parkinson, J., Secker, J. ve Stewart-Brown, S. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1), 50-63. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
Tommasi, M., Grassi, P., Balsamo, M., Picconi, L., Furnham, A., & Saggino, A. (2018). Correlations between personality, affective and filial self-efficacy beliefs, and psychological well-being in a sample of Italian adolescents. Psychological Reports, 121(1), 59–78.
Yang, Y., Li, P., Fu, X., & Kou, Y. (2017). Orientations to happiness and subjective well-being in Chinese adolescents: The roles of prosocial behavior and internet addictive behavior. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(6), 1747–1762.
Yap, S. T., & Baharudin, R. (2015). The relationship between adolescents’ perceived parental involvement, self-efficacy beliefs, and subjective well-being: A multiple mediator model. Social Indicators Research, 126(1), 257–278.
You, S., Lim, S. S., & Kim, E. K. (2018). Relationships between social support, internal assets, and life satisfaction in Korean adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(3), 897-915.
Zhang, J. H. (2011). Relationships between cognitive flexibility and coping strategies of high school students (Master’s Thesis, Hebei University, China). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
