THEORETICAL-METHODOLOGICAL PROPOSAL TO EVALUATE THE QUALITY OF DATABASES: APPLICATION TO THE FIELD OF NURSING

Authors

  • Juan Francisco Guillén Ríos RESIDENCIA DE ENFERMOS MENTALES CRÓNICOS "LUIS VALENCIANO" UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA
  • María Dolores Ayuso García PROFESORA TITULAR DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.17.2.200691
Keywords: Quality, bibliographic databases, bibliographic databases quality, quality assessment, nursing

Abstract

In this work, it has formulated an analytic-descriptive and informative methodology created "ad hoc" for the evaluation of the quality of databases on line more useful for nursing, in which is provided as the central axis for the development of the work the "Protocol for the evaluation of digital information sources published on the Internet" and its "Good Practice Guide ", 2003 and 2006 respectively raised by doctors María Dolores Ayuso García and Victoria Martínez Navarro. To do this, specific evaluation criteria for this type of information resources relevant to nursing are applied that are structured into sections (Micronavegation, Macronavegaction and Usability), and within each section, it includes dimensions which are subdivided into specific characteristics of evaluation and it assigns scores ranging from 0 to 3 points.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Juan Francisco Guillén Ríos, RESIDENCIA DE ENFERMOS MENTALES CRÓNICOS "LUIS VALENCIANO" UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA

DIPLOMADO EN ENFERMERÍA, LICENCIADO EN DOCUMENTACION Y DOCTOR POR LA UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA. MIEMBRO EVALUADOR DE LA COMISIÓN DE EVALUACIÓN DE LOS CURSOS DE FORMACIÓN CONTINUADA DE LAS PROFESIONES SANITARIAS DE LA REGIÓN DE MURCIA. PROFESOR COLABORADOR EN LA UNIDAD DOCENTE DE MATRONAS DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA.
Published
20-11-2014
How to Cite
Guillén Ríos, J. F., & Ayuso García, M. D. (2014). THEORETICAL-METHODOLOGICAL PROPOSAL TO EVALUATE THE QUALITY OF DATABASES: APPLICATION TO THE FIELD OF NURSING. Information Science Journal, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.17.2.200691
Issue
Section
Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
41%
33%
Days to publication 
155
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
Anales de Documentación
Publisher 
Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (Editum)