Elements of representation at the metamodel level from different perspectives

Linair Maria Campos

doi:10.6018/analesdoc.677461

Autores/as

Linair Maria Campos Universidade Federal Fluminense https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2411-8666

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.677461

Palabras clave: Modelos conceptuales, Sistemas de organización del conocimiento, Metamodelos, Perspectivas ontológicas, Perspectivas epistemológicas

Agencias de apoyo

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Resumen

Los elementos de representación a nivel de metamodelo son insumos que pueden utilizarse de manera coherente en la construcción de Sistemas de Organización del Conocimiento (SOC) para dominios específicos, y cuya adopción está vinculada a perspectivas ontológicas y epistemológicas que no siempre se explicitan. En este contexto, el objetivo de este artículo es definir, desde múltiples perspectivas, los elementos básicos situados en el nivel de metamodelo y sus fundamentos teóricos. Desde el punto de vista metodológico, adopta un enfoque cualitativo del problema y, en cuanto a sus objetivos, tiene carácter exploratorio. En relación con los procedimientos técnicos, se caracteriza como una investigación bibliográfica. Como resultado, se presenta una síntesis de los elementos a nivel de metamodelo discutidos desde diversas perspectivas. Se concluye que comprender estos elementos, junto con las perspectivas ontológicas y epistemológicas que los sustentan, es esencial para el desarrollo de sistemas de organización del conocimiento precisos e interoperables.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Metrics

Vistas/Descargas

Resumen
250
PDF-ENG
122
XML
3

Citas

Abbagnano, N. (2007). Dictionary of philosophy. Martins Fontes.

Almeida, M. B. (2021). Ontological theories for modeling. Fronteiras da Representação do Conhecimento, 1(2), 95–126.

Armstrong, D. M. (1989). Universals: An opinionated introduction. Westview Press.

Arp, R., Smith, B., & Spear, A. D. (2015). Building ontologies with basic formal ontology. MIT Press.

Bardin, L. (2011). Content analysis. Edições 70.

Bealer, G. (1998). Concept possession. Philosophical Issues, 9, 331–338.

Berkeley, G. (2002). A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge (D. Wilkins, Ed.). Trinity College.

Bittner, T., Donnelly, M., & Smith, B. (2004). Individuals, universals, collections: On the foundational relations of ontology. In A. Varzi & L. Vieu (Eds.), Formal ontology in information systems: Proceedings of the third international conference (FOIS) (pp. 37–48). IOS Press.

Branquinho, J., Murcho, D., & Gomes, N. G. (Eds.). (2005). Encyclopedia of logical-philosophical terms. Martins Fontes.

Brower, J. E. (2016). Aquinas on the problem of universals. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 92(3), 715–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12176

Bunge, M. (2012). Dicionário de filosofia. Perspectiva.

Calemi, F. (Ed.). (2016). Metaphysics and scientific realism: Essays in honor of David Malet Armstrong. Walter de Gruyter.

Campbell, K. (1981). The metaphysic of abstract particulars. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 6, 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1981.tb00453.x

Campos, L. M. (2025). Concept in different meanings: Impacts on the records in contexts ontology [Ponencia]. 8th Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization (ISKO Brasil), Canela, Brasil. https://cip.brapci.inf.br/download/351990

Chadha, M. (2014). On knowing universals: The Nyāya way. Philosophy East and West, 64(2), 287–302.

Crane, J. (2003). Locke's theory of classification. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 11(2), 249–259.

Dahlberg, I. (1978a). A referent-oriented analytical concept theory of interconcept. International Classification, 5(3), 142–150.

Dahlberg, I. (1978b). Ontical structures and universal classification. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment.

De Boni, L. A. (2008). Sobre a vida e a obra de Duns Scotus. Veritas, 53(3), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2008.3.4298

Ferrater Mora, J. (1977). Fictions, universals, and abstract entities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 37(3), 353–367.

Goodman, N., & Quine, W. V. O. (1947). Steps toward a constructive nominalism. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12(4), 105–122.

Grenon, P., & Smith, B. (2004). SNAP and SPAN: Towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4(1), 69–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15427633SCC0401_5

Grossmann, R. (1960). Conceptualism. The Review of Metaphysics, 14(2), 243–254.

Guarino, N., & Welty, C. (2001). Supporting ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 39, 51–74.

Guizzardi, G. (2005). Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models (Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente). University of Twente Repository. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/ontological-foundations-for-structural-conceptual-models/

Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., de Almeida Falbo, R., Almeida, J. P. A., Guizzardi, R. S. S., & Moreira, J. L. R. (2021). Types and taxonomic structures in conceptual modeling: A novel ontological theory and engineering support. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 134, 101891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2021.101891

Guizzardi, G., & Zamborlini, V. (2012). A common foundational theory for bridging two levels in ontology-driven conceptual modeling. In Software Language Engineering (SLE 2012) (pp. 286–310). Springer.

Hjørland, B. (2009). Concept theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1519–1536. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21082

International Organization for Standardization. (1969). ISO/R 1087:1969: Vocabulary of terminology. Author.

Inwagen van, P. (2024). Metaphysics (5th ed.). Routledge.

Johansson, I. (2004). Ontological investigations: An inquiry into the categories of nature, man and society (2nd ed.). Ontos Verlag.

Joseph, M. (2008). O trivium: The liberal arts of logic, grammar and rhetoric (1st ed.). É Realizações.

Kant, I. (2001). Critique of pure reason (A. F. Morujão, Trans.). Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

Kleineberg, M. (2013). The blind men and the elephant: Towards an organization of epistemic contexts. Knowledge Organization, 40(5), 340–364.

Klemke, E. D. (1960). Universals and particulars in a phenomenalist ontology. Philosophy of Science, 27(3), 254–261.

Klima, G. (2022). The medieval problem of universals. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2022 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/universals-medieval/

Kühne, T. (2006). Matters of (meta-) modeling. Software and Systems Modeling, 5, 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-006-0017-9

Lewis, D. K. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell.

Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding (P. H. Nidditch, Ed.). Oxford University Press.

Lowe, E. J. (2002). A survey of metaphysics. Oxford University Press.

Machado, L. M. O., Martínez-Ávila, D., Almeida, M. B., & Borges, M. M. (2023). Towards a moderate realist foundation for ontological knowledge organization systems: The question of the naturalness of classifications. Journal of Information Science, 49(4), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231160031

McGill, V. J. (1934). The realm of universals. The Philosophical Review, 43(3), 245–257.

Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology (Technical Report No. KSL-01-05; SMI-2001-0880). Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory.

Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A. (1946). The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism (8th ed.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Plantinga, A. (1987). Two concepts of modality: Modal realism and modal reductionism. Philosophical Perspectives, 1, 189–231.

Poli, R. (2002). Glancing at the problems of contemporary ontology. Scire, 8(1), 17–40.

Porello, D., & Guizzardi, G. (2017). Towards a cognitive semantics of types. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the XVIth International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (pp. 428–440).

Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific realism: How science tracks truth. Routledge.

Ridi, R. (2016). Phenomena or noumena? Objective and subjective aspects in knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 43(4), 239–253.

Rorty, R. (1980). Pragmatism, relativism, and irrationalism. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 53(6), 717–738.

Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Saint-Andre, P. (2002). Conceptualism in Abelard and Rand. The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, 4(1), 123–140.

Simons, P. (1994). Particulars in particular clothing: Three trope theories of substance. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54(3), 553–575.

Sire, J. W. (2004). Naming the elephant: Worldview as a concept. InterVarsity Press.

Smith, B. (1997). On substances, accidents and universals: In defense of a constituent ontology. Philosophical Papers, 27, 105–127.

Smith, B. (2008). New desiderata for biomedical terminologies. In K. Munn & B. Smith (Eds.), Applied ontology: An introduction (pp. 83–108). Ontos Verlag.

Smith, B. (2010). On classifying material entities in basic formal ontology. In W. Ceusters & B. Smith (Eds.), Interdisciplinary ontology (pp. 1–13). Keio University Press.

Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Köhler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A. L., & Rosse, C. (2006). Towards a reference terminology for ontology research and development in the biomedical domain. In Proceedings of the KR-MED 2006 Workshop on Formal Biomedical Knowledge Representation (pp. 57–65).

Smith, B., & Ceusters, W. (2010). Ontological realism: A methodology for coordinated evolution of scientific ontologies. Applied Ontology, 5, 139–188. https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-2010-0079

Smith, B., Ceusters, W., & Temmerman, R. (2005). Wüsteria. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 116, 647–652.

Smith, B., Grenon, P., Goldberg, L., & Arp, R. (2015). Basic formal ontology 2.0: Specification and user's guide. Basic Formal Ontology Project.

Spear, A. D. (2006). Ontology for the twenty-first century: An introduction with recommendations. Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science.

Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2024). Epistemology. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

Strawson, P. F. (2003). Individuals: An essay in descriptive metaphysics. Routledge.

Tôrres, M. R. (2008). The concept of the universal in Peter Abelard: Its historical and philosophical implications [Ponencia]. 16º Encontro Regional de História da ANPUH-MG, Juiz de Fora, Brasil.

Vollmer, G. (1984). Mesocosm and objective knowledge: On problems solved by evolutionary epistemology. In F. M. Wuketits (Ed.), Concepts and approaches in evolutionary epistemology: Towards an evolutionary theory of knowledge (pp. 69–121). Springer.

Vollmer, G. (2017). Why do theories fail? The best argument for realism. In E. Agazzi (Ed.), Varieties of scientific realism: Objectivity and truth in science (pp. 165–175). Springer.

Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology (Corrected ed., D. R. Griffin & D. W. Sherburne, Eds.). Free Press.

Zalta, E. N. (1983). Abstract objects: An introduction to axiomatic metaphysics. D. Reidel Publishing Company.