El Neurofeminismo frente a la investigación sobre la diferencia sexual

Sonia Reverter-Bañon

Resumen


En el presente trabajo se exponen las carencias más importantes en la investigación de la denominada “diferencia sexual en el cerebro”. Desde la revisión y análisis crítico del grupo de científicas NeuroGenderings Network se propone una superación de los prejuicios que, de manera obvia o solapada, continúan manteniéndose en la investigación en relación a las diferencias sexuales en el cerebro. La tarea de “guerrilla epistemológica” que este grupo feminista lleva a cabo con el fin de ir conformando un conocimiento rigurosamente científico se podrá ver con el ejemplo concreto de la propuesta que hacen a una revista neurocientífica.


Palabras clave


ciberfeminismo; neurociencias; epistemología feminista

Texto completo

PDF

Referencias


AINSWORTH, Claire (2015): “Sex Redefined”, Nature, 518, 19 February: 288-291.

BAKER, Monya (2016): “1.500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Survey sheds light on the ‘crisis’ rocking Research”, Nature 533: 452–454 (26 May 2016).

BLEIER, Ruth (1984): Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women, Elsevier Science & Technology Books, Amsterdam.

BRIZENDINE, Louann (2006): The Female Brain, Broadway Books, Random House, New York.

BUTLER, Judith (1990): Gender Trouble, Routledge, New York.

CAHILL, Larry (2017): “An issue whose time has come,” Journal of Neuroscience Research 95 (2017): 12–13

CLAYTON, Janine A. & COLLINS, Francis S. (2014): “NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies”, Nature 509 (7500): 282–283.

DAVIS, Lennard J. & MORRIS, David B. (2007): “Biocultures Manifesto”. New Literary History: a journal of theory and interpretation, 38(3): 411-418.

ELIOT, Lise & RICHARDSON, Sarah S. (2016): “Sex in Context: Limitations of Animal Studies for Addressing Human Sex/Gender Neurobehavioral Health Disparities”, Journal of Neuroscience, 36 (47): 11823-11830.

FAUSTO-STERLING, Anne (2000): Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality, Basic Books, New York.

FINE, Cordelia (2008): “Will working mothers' brains explode? The popular new genre of neurosexism”, Neuroethics 1 (1): 69-72.

FINE, Cordelia (2010): Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference, W. W. Norton, New York.

FINE, Cordelia & JORDAN-YOUNG, Rebecca (2017): “We’ve been labelled ‘anti-sex difference’ for demanding greater scientific rigour”, The Guardian, 6/4/2017.

FINE, Cordelia; JORDAN-YOUNG, Rebecca; KAISER, Anelis & RIPPON, Gina (2013): “Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity and the rígid problema of sex”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11): 550–551.

FOX KELLER, Evelyn (2010): The Mirage of a Space between Nature and

Nurture, Duke University Press, Durkham & London.

GARCÍA DAUDER, Silvia & PÉREZ SEDEÑO, Eulalia (2017): Las ‘mentiras’ científicas sobre las mujeres, Los libros de la catarata, Madrid.

GERGEN, Kenneth J. (2010): “The acculturated Brain”, Theory & Psychology 20 (6): 795-816.

GOTTLIEB, Gilbert (2000): “Environmental and behavioral influence on gene activity”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 93–97.

GOTTLIEB, Gilbert (2002): “Developmental-behavioral initiation of evolutionary change”, Psychological Review, 109: 211–218.

GREENFIELD, Susan (2000): The private life of the brain, Penguin Press, New York .

GROSZ, Elizabeth (1994): Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

HANSSON, Sven Ove (2015): “Science and Pseudo-Science”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Disponible: . Consultado 24 Febrero 2016.

HUBBARD, Ruth (1990): The Politics of Women’s Biology, New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, New Jersey & London.

JOEL, Daphna et al (2015): “Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 112 (50): 15468–15473.

JOEL, Daphna & McCARTHY, Margaret M. (2017): “Incorporating Sex As a Biological Variable in Neuropsychiatric Research: Where Are We Now and Where Should We Be?”, Neuropsychopharmacology, (2017)42: 379–385.

KAISER, Anelis (2012): “Re-Conceptualizing ‘Sex’ and ‘Gender’ in the Human Brain”, Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 220(2): 130–136.

KRAUS, Cynthia (2011): “Critical Studies of the Sexed Brain: A Critique of What and for Whom?”, Neuroethics, 5(3): 247-259

LAQUEUR, Thomas (1994): La construcción del sexo. Cuerpo y genero desde los griegos hasta Freud, Cátedra, Colección Feminismos, Madrid. Traducción del original de 1990 por Eugenio Portela.

LI, Schu-Chen (2003): “Biocultural Orchestration of Developmental Plasticity Across Levels: The Interplay of Biology and Culture in Shaping the Mind and Behavior Across the Life Span”, Psychological Bulletin of the American Psychological Association, 129(2): 171–194.

LITTLEFIELD, Melissa & JOHNSON, Jenell, eds. (2012): Neuroscientific Turn: Transdisciplinarity in the Age of the Brain, The University Of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor .

MANEY, Donna L. (2015): “Just like a circus: the public consumption of sex differences”, Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, 19: 279-96.

MANEY, Donna L. (2016): “Perils and pitfalls of reporting sex differences”, Philosophical Transactions B. The Royal Society Publishing, 371(1688): 20150119.

McCARTHY, Margaret M. (2016): “Multifaceted origins of sex differences in the brain”, Philosophical Transactions B. The Royal Society Publishing. 371(1688): 20150106.

MEHL, Matthias R.; VAZIRE, Simine; RAMÍREZ-ESPARZA, Nairán; SLATCHER, Richard B. ; PENNEBAKER, James W. (2007): “Are Women Really More Talkative Than Men?”, Science, 6 Jul 2007: 82

NICHOLSON, Linda (1994): “Interpreting Gender”, Signs. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 20(1): 79-105.

O’CONNOR, Cliodhna & JOFFE, Helene (2014): “Gender on the Brain: A Case Study of Science Communication in the New Media Environment”, PLoS ONE, 9(10): e110830.

OSC Open Science Collaboration (2012): “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science”, Reproducibility Project: Psychology, Open Science Framework. Disponible en Consultado el 21 diciembre 2016.

PRAGER, Eric M. (2017): “Addressing Sex as a Biological Variable”, Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95 (2017): 11.

RIDLEY, Matt (2003): Nature via nurture: Genes, experience, and what makes us human, HarperCollins Publishers, New York.

RIPPON, Gina, JORDAN-YOUNG, Rebecca, KAISER, Anelis & FINE, Cordelia (2014): “Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation”, Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 8: 650.

RIPPON, Gina, JORDAN-YOUNG, Rebbecca, KAISER, Anelis, JOEL, Daphna & FINE, Cordelia (2017): “Journal of neuroscience research policy on addressing sex as a biological variable: Comments, clarifications, and elaborations”, Journal of Neuroscience Research. Doi:10.1002/jnr.24045 (solo online). Consultado 4-3-2017.

ROSE, Nikolas & ABI-RACHED, Joelle M. (2013): Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

RUSSETT, Cynthia E (1989): Sexual Science: The Victorian Construction of Womanhood, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

SCHMITZ, Sigrid (2012): “The neurotechnological cerebral subject: Persistence of implicit and explicit gender norms in a network of change”, Neuroethics, 5(3): 261-274.

SCOTT, Anne (1997): “The Knowledge in Our Bones: Standpoint Theory, Alternative Health and the Quantum Model of the Body”, Maynard, Mary, ed., Science and the Construction of Women, University College London, London, pp.106-125.

SEVERIN, Laura & WYER, Mary (2000): “The Science and Politics of the Search for Sex Differences: editorial”, NWSA Journal, 12(3): vii-xvi.

SIMMONS, Joseph P., NELSON, Leif D., SIMONSOHN, Uri (2011): “False-Positive Psychology. Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant”, Psychological Science, 22(11): 1359-1366.

SKOLNICK WEISBERG, D., Keil, F.C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. (2008): “The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations”, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20: 470–477.

SPELMAN, Elizabeth V. (2007): “Managing Ignorance”, en Sullivan, Shanon & Tuana, Nancy, eds. Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance, SUNY Press, New York, pp. 119-134.

SPIVAK, Gayatri Ch. (1993): Outside in the Teaching Machine, Routledge, New York & London.

SPRAGUE, Joey (20016, 2005): Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers: Bridging Differences, Rowman & Littlefield, London.

TOBACH, Ethel & ROSOFF, Betty, eds. (1994): Challenging racism & sexism: Alternatives to genetic explanations, The Feminist Press, CUNY Press, New York..

TUANA, Nancy (2004): “Coming to understand: Orgasm and the epistemology of ignorance, Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 19(1): 194-232.

TUANA, Nancy (2006): “The Speculum of Ignorance: The Women’s Health Movement and Epistemologies of Ignorance”, Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 21(3): 1-19.

WOOD, Jane (2001): Passion and Pathology in Victorian Fiction, Oxford University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon/291561

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Sello de Calidad FECyT 2014